On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:33 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 03:13:56PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:42 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:33 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 03:13:56PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:42 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:42 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> commit bffa72cf7f9df842f0016ba03586039296b4caaf upstream
>
> skb->rbnode shares space with skb->next,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 5:42 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> commit bffa72cf7f9df842f0016ba03586039296b4caaf upstream
>
> skb->rbnode shares space with skb->next,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Mitch Harder
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael wang wrote:
>>> Hi, Mitch
>>>
>>> On 08/17/2013 10:01 PM, Mitch Harder
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Mitch Harder
mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael wang wrote:
Hi, Mitch
On 08/17/2013 10:01 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
I'm
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael wang wrote:
>> Hi, Mitch
>>
>> On 08/17/2013 10:01 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
>> > I'm encountering a BUG while using a ZRAM Swap device.
>&
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:13:02PM +0800, Michael wang wrote:
Hi, Mitch
On 08/17/2013 10:01 PM, Mitch Harder wrote:
I'm encountering a BUG while using a ZRAM Swap device.
The call trace seems to involve
I'm encountering a BUG while using a ZRAM Swap device.
The call trace seems to involve the changes recently added to 3.10.6
by the patch:
zram: use zram->lock to protect zram_free_page() in swap free notify path
The hardware is a x86 single CPU AMD Athlon XP system with 1GB RAM.
I'm
I'm encountering a BUG while using a ZRAM Swap device.
The call trace seems to involve the changes recently added to 3.10.6
by the patch:
zram: use zram-lock to protect zram_free_page() in swap free notify path
The hardware is a x86 single CPU AMD Athlon XP system with 1GB RAM.
I'm implementing
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 08:17 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 07:53:36AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>>> On 12/19/2012 07:08 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:21:28PM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
> On 12/18/2012 07:49 PM,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Nitin Gupta ngu...@vflare.org wrote:
On 12/19/2012 08:17 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 07:53:36AM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
On 12/19/2012 07:08 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:21:28PM -0800, Nitin Gupta wrote:
On 12/18/2012 07:49
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:55:06AM -0700, james northrup wrote:
>> looks like ARM results are inconclusive from a lot of folks without
>> bandwidth to do a write-up, what about just plain STAGING status for ARM so
>> the android tweakers can
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:55:06AM -0700, james northrup wrote:
looks like ARM results are inconclusive from a lot of folks without
bandwidth to do a write-up, what about just plain STAGING status for ARM so
the android
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:28 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:19:14AM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
>> I was testing the lz4(hc) patches, and I found the the compression
>> INCOMPAT flags are not being updated using the method in this patch.
>>
>> The
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:28 PM, David Sterba d...@jikos.cz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:19:14AM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
I was testing the lz4(hc) patches, and I found the the compression
INCOMPAT flags are not being updated using the method in this patch.
The compression INCOMPAT
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:40 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:48:37AM +0200, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
>> How show should we proceed to get above mentioned patch
>> (or the similar patch from Andrei Popa) merged?
>
> Josef picked the patch into btrfs-next, I see not problem to
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:40 AM, David Sterba d...@jikos.cz wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:48:37AM +0200, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
How show should we proceed to get above mentioned patch
(or the similar patch from Andrei Popa) merged?
Josef picked the patch into btrfs-next, I see not problem
18 matches
Mail list logo
