Hardware problem detection? Linux 2.4.3-pre4 lockups.

2001-03-15 Thread Nathan Black
I am at a total loss, But I have found some interesting anomalies with my hardware. My Current Setup: Supermicro S370DE6 (Serverworks Chipset) Dual PIII 866 2 x 256 MB PC133 ECC SDRAM onboard AIC 7899 SCSI Controller. 36G,73GB Seagate Cheetah Drive. Voodoo4 4500 AGP video, Fore PCA 200e ATM

Hardware problem detection? Linux 2.4.3-pre4 lockups.

2001-03-15 Thread Nathan Black
I am at a total loss, But I have found some interesting anomalies with my hardware. My Current Setup: Supermicro S370DE6 (Serverworks Chipset) Dual PIII 866 2 x 256 MB PC133 ECC SDRAM onboard AIC 7899 SCSI Controller. 36G,73GB Seagate Cheetah Drive. Voodoo4 4500 AGP video, Fore PCA 200e ATM

RE: PROBLEM- Segmentation fault occurs when dd'ing entire drive (9.x GB) to a vfat partition.

2001-02-28 Thread Nathan Black
This is NOT a dd problem. I have been trying to write large files to a vfat filesystem. This is definitely a bug with the kernel. I have had the seg fault. Try running the program again, but look at your console. It think that it will result in a kernel bug statement.I think that mine said it was

RE: PROBLEM- Segmentation fault occurs when dd'ing entire drive (9.x GB) to a vfat partition.

2001-02-28 Thread Nathan Black
This is NOT a dd problem. I have been trying to write large files to a vfat filesystem. This is definitely a bug with the kernel. I have had the seg fault. Try running the program again, but look at your console. It think that it will result in a kernel bug statement.I think that mine said it was

RE: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

2001-02-19 Thread Nathan Black
PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 7:06 PM To: Nathan Black Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans [Nathan Black] > This really improved the performance of my dual PIII-866 w/512MB Ram > and AIC7899 scsi. [...] > I would suggest, if at all possible, puttin

RE: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

2001-02-19 Thread Nathan Black
PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 7:06 PM To: Nathan Black Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans [Nathan Black] This really improved the performance of my dual PIII-866 w/512MB Ram and AIC7899 scsi. [...] I would suggest, if at all possible, putting this in

RE: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

2001-02-15 Thread Nathan Black
I must say, after I saw this post, I tried out the latest driver for my own purposes. This really improved the performance of my dual PIII-866 w/512MB Ram and AIC7899 scsi. I have a couple of cheetah drives that I am writing data that I get off of an ATM card.(about 12-14 MB/sec rate). This

RE: aic7xxx (and sym53c8xx) plans

2001-02-15 Thread Nathan Black
I must say, after I saw this post, I tried out the latest driver for my own purposes. This really improved the performance of my dual PIII-866 w/512MB Ram and AIC7899 scsi. I have a couple of cheetah drives that I am writing data that I get off of an ATM card.(about 12-14 MB/sec rate). This

RE: rawio usage

2001-02-06 Thread Nathan Black
need 512 byte alignment i.e. change char writeBuf[512]; to: char writeBuf[1023]; writeBuf = (char *)(((int )[0] + 511) &~511); This will typecast the writeBuffer address to an int and add 511 to the address. When you and that with ~511( invert 511). That will result int

RE: rawio usage

2001-02-06 Thread Nathan Black
need 512 byte alignment i.e. change char writeBuf[512]; to: char writeBuf[1023]; writeBuf = (char *)(((int )writeBuf[0] + 511) ~511); This will typecast the writeBuffer address to an int and add 511 to the address. When you and that with ~511( invert 511). That will result

RE: drive/block device write scheduling, buffer flushing?

2001-01-31 Thread Nathan Black
That is what I wanted to do...Write directly to the disk. But the kernel(2.4.1) is caching the io... -Original Message- From: bert hubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 12:51 PM To: Nathan Black Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: drive/block device write

drive/block device write scheduling, buffer flushing?

2001-01-31 Thread Nathan Black
I was wondering if there is a way to make the kernel write to disk faster. I need to maintain a 10 MB /sec write rate to a 10K scsi disk in a computer, but it caches and doesn't start writing to disk until I hit about 700 MB. At that point, it pauses(presumably while the kernel is flushing some

RE: drive/block device write scheduling, buffer flushing?

2001-01-31 Thread Nathan Black
That is what I wanted to do...Write directly to the disk. But the kernel(2.4.1) is caching the io... -Original Message- From: bert hubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 12:51 PM To: Nathan Black Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: drive/block device write

RE: Bolck Device problem or Compaq Smart array 2 problem? kernel -2.4 .0+

2001-01-29 Thread Nathan Black
with an adaptec scsi 160 to see if that behaves better. Nathan -Original Message- From: Dr. Michael Weller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 11:39 AM To: Nathan Black Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bolck Device problem or Compaq Smart array 2 problem? kernel -2.4

RE: Bolck Device problem or Compaq Smart array 2 problem? kernel -2.4 .0+

2001-01-29 Thread Nathan Black
EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 11:38 AM To: Nathan Black Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bolck Device problem or Compaq Smart array 2 problem? kernel -2.4 .0+ On Mon, Jan 29 2001, Nathan Black wrote: > Here are my results. > > 2.2.18- works fine. 24 MBytes/sec at 100+ g

Bolck Device problem or Compaq Smart array 2 problem? kernel -2.4.0+

2001-01-29 Thread Nathan Black
Here is my scenario. I have a smart array controller 2. I have 6 logical drives( one on it's own physical drive). I am using the one drive for data aquisition from an atm board. To locate my problem, I removed all of the atm stuff. and I am trying just a read/write. Both show the same symptoms.

Bolck Device problem or Compaq Smart array 2 problem? kernel -2.4.0+

2001-01-29 Thread Nathan Black
Here is my scenario. I have a smart array controller 2. I have 6 logical drives( one on it's own physical drive). I am using the one drive for data aquisition from an atm board. To locate my problem, I removed all of the atm stuff. and I am trying just a read/write. Both show the same symptoms.

RE: Bolck Device problem or Compaq Smart array 2 problem? kernel -2.4 .0+

2001-01-29 Thread Nathan Black
EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 11:38 AM To: Nathan Black Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bolck Device problem or Compaq Smart array 2 problem? kernel -2.4 .0+ On Mon, Jan 29 2001, Nathan Black wrote: Here are my results. 2.2.18- works fine. 24 MBytes/sec at 100+ gigabytes (16GB l

RE: Bolck Device problem or Compaq Smart array 2 problem? kernel -2.4 .0+

2001-01-29 Thread Nathan Black
with an adaptec scsi 160 to see if that behaves better. Nathan -Original Message- From: Dr. Michael Weller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 11:39 AM To: Nathan Black Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bolck Device problem or Compaq Smart array 2 problem? kernel -2.4

RE: No SCSI Ultra 160 with Adaptec Controller

2001-01-24 Thread Nathan Black
What problem are you trying to solve, I just joined the group in hopes of finding a solution to a problem of mine. It sounds like they may be related. I am trying to write to a drive(raw, blank, whatever you want to call it) on kernel 2.4.1-pre10. I get great throughput at first, but then it

RE: No SCSI Ultra 160 with Adaptec Controller

2001-01-24 Thread Nathan Black
What problem are you trying to solve, I just joined the group in hopes of finding a solution to a problem of mine. It sounds like they may be related. I am trying to write to a drive(raw, blank, whatever you want to call it) on kernel 2.4.1-pre10. I get great throughput at first, but then it