On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 04:05:13PM -0500, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Bloat removal: being able to run without /proc mounted.
>
> We don't have "kernel speed". We have kernel-mode screwing around
> with text formatting.
Or calculating things that really should be taken care of in
user
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 04:05:13PM -0500, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
Bloat removal: being able to run without /proc mounted.
We don't have "kernel speed". We have kernel-mode screwing around
with text formatting.
Or calculating things that really should be taken care of in
user space,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:21:37PM +, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> CPU utilisation. Each new application has to calculate it (ps, top, qps,
> kps, various sysmons, procmons, etc.). Wouldn't it be worth it having a
> syscall for that? Wouldn't it be more optimal?
No, it wouldn't be
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:21:37PM +, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
CPU utilisation. Each new application has to calculate it (ps, top, qps,
kps, various sysmons, procmons, etc.). Wouldn't it be worth it having a
syscall for that? Wouldn't it be more optimal?
No, it wouldn't be
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 12:21:12PM -0500, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
> "As such, clients will not be allowed to alter the code in any form and
> may not give any other party access to any aspect of that code."
>
> Does this preclude one reading the source and then using
> the knowledge gained to
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 12:21:12PM -0500, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
"As such, clients will not be allowed to alter the code in any form and
may not give any other party access to any aspect of that code."
Does this preclude one reading the source and then using
the knowledge gained to write,
ing to sound
more and more like arguments made a while back by a certain OS vendor from
Seattle . . .
Wish not to seem, but to be, the best.
-- Aeschylus
--
Nathan Paul Simons, Junior Software Engineer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
to sound
more and more like arguments made a while back by a certain OS vendor from
Seattle . . .
Wish not to seem, but to be, the best.
-- Aeschylus
--
Nathan Paul Simons, Junior Software Engineer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
ompile it
correctly, but it's still a decent C compiler. g++ on the other hand . . .
--
Nathan Paul Simons, Junior Software Engineer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTEC
it
correctly, but it's still a decent C compiler. g++ on the other hand . . .
--
Nathan Paul Simons, Junior Software Engineer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P
ocess has any kernel locks.
--
Nathan Paul Simons, Junior Software Engineer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ers/scsi/README.aic7xxx (in both
2.4.0 and 2.2.17):
AHA-29160M
--
Nathan Paul Simons, Junior Software Engineer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
2.2.17):
AHA-29160M
--
Nathan Paul Simons, Junior Software Engineer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ss has any kernel locks.
--
Nathan Paul Simons, Junior Software Engineer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 11:50:58PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Another problem is that bitkeeper has not been through a security audit.
Maybe, but i like the fact that BitKeeper uses ssh by default for
transmitting data.
--
Nathan Paul Simons, Programmer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 11:50:58PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Another problem is that bitkeeper has not been through a security audit.
Maybe, but i like the fact that BitKeeper uses ssh by default for
transmitting data.
--
Nathan Paul Simons, Programmer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com
they
"only work here" and would prefer a debugger because it means they don't have
to think as hard.
--
Nathan Paul Simons, Programmer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [
ome
things really shouldn't be.
--
Nathan Paul Simons, Programmer for FSMLabs
http://www.fsmlabs.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
hree files and one directory
straight for each different configuration of the kernel that they want to
play with, they probably shouldn't be configuring and compiling kernels in
the first place. You can't idiot-proof the world, and even if you could, some
things really shouldn't be.
--
Nathan P
19 matches
Mail list logo
