On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:41:28AM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> some architectures don't care at all, because verify_area is a noop
> (sparc64).
Why (and how) is this?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send th
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:41:28AM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
some architectures don't care at all, because verify_area is a noop
(sparc64).
Why (and how) is this?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hello,
For 2.4 kernels, how is memory between 1G and 4G used ? Is it only for
cache/buffers or it is also offered to processes ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
Hello,
For 2.4 kernels, how is memory between 1G and 4G used ? Is it only for
cache/buffers or it is also offered to processes ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
s window :xxx:xx. Bad, what else
can I say?" which I understand are harmless)
Let me know if anyone needs more info/tests/etc.
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
indow :xxx:xx. Bad, what else
can I say?" which I understand are harmless)
Let me know if anyone needs more info/tests/etc.
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kern
Hello,
What is the impact of enabling ECN on the server side ? I mean, will
any clients (with broken firewalls) be affected if a SMTP/HTTP server
has ECN enabled ?
On the other hand, is there any advantage with ECN enabled on the server
side ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Hello,
What is the impact of enabling ECN on the server side ? I mean, will
any clients (with broken firewalls) be affected if a SMTP/HTTP server
has ECN enabled ?
On the other hand, is there any advantage with ECN enabled on the server
side ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Hello,
Is it possible to bind a raw device to a software RAID 1 array ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please re
Hello,
For a RAID1 array built of two disks on two separate SCSI controllers,
are the reads balanced between the two controllers (for higher speed) ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Hello,
For a RAID1 array built of two disks on two separate SCSI controllers,
are the reads balanced between the two controllers (for higher speed) ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Hello,
Is it possible to bind a raw device to a software RAID 1 array ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please re
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 05:21:33AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > Got more "udp v4 hw csum failure" messages but still no "UDP packet
> > with bad csum was fragmented".
>
> OK, last experiment :-) Add this patch, and watch to s
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 05:21:33AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > Got more "udp v4 hw csum failure" messages but still no "UDP packet
> > with bad csum was fragmented".
>
> OK, last experiment :-) Add this patch, and watch to s
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:10:03PM +0200, Petru Paler wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:32:40AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Petru Paler writes:
> > > > Oh, I think I know why this happens. Can you add this patch, and next
> > > > time the UDP
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:32:40AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > > Oh, I think I know why this happens. Can you add this patch, and next
> > > time the UDP bad csum message appears, tell me if it says "UDP packet
> > > with bad csu
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:58:54AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > Ok. Should I keep reporting new syslog messages as they appear ?
>
> Not the "Undo ***" and "Disorder ***" ones".
Ok.
> But this one
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:33:26AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > I get messages in syslog looking like:
> >
> > Undo loss 192.147.174.183/59953 c2 l0 ss2/65535 p0
> > Undo loss 63.148.232.53/4423 c2 l0 ss2/2 p0
> > Undo loss
don't think either Postfix or tinydns (the main load) are using
sendfile().
The machine is stable so far, but it's been up for only 15 minutes.
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:19:33AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > Trying to compile 2.4.0-ac8 resulted in an error about
> > storage size of variable d not being known (I don't have the
> > exact error at hand, the network connectivity to that serv
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:19:33AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Petru Paler writes:
Trying to compile 2.4.0-ac8 resulted in an error about
storage size of variable d not being known (I don't have the
exact error at hand, the network connectivity to that server
is down right now
don't think either Postfix or tinydns (the main load) are using
sendfile().
The machine is stable so far, but it's been up for only 15 minutes.
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:33:26AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Petru Paler writes:
I get messages in syslog looking like:
Undo loss 192.147.174.183/59953 c2 l0 ss2/65535 p0
Undo loss 63.148.232.53/4423 c2 l0 ss2/2 p0
Undo loss 204.253.105.63/25 c2 l0 ss2/2 p0
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:58:54AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Petru Paler writes:
Ok. Should I keep reporting new syslog messages as they appear ?
Not the "Undo ***" and "Disorder ***" ones".
Ok.
But this one is curious:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:32:40AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Petru Paler writes:
Oh, I think I know why this happens. Can you add this patch, and next
time the UDP bad csum message appears, tell me if it says "UDP packet
with bad csum was fragmented." in the next li
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 02:10:03PM +0200, Petru Paler wrote:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:32:40AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Petru Paler writes:
Oh, I think I know why this happens. Can you add this patch, and next
time the UDP bad csum message appears, tell me if it says &quo
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 05:21:33AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Petru Paler writes:
Got more "udp v4 hw csum failure" messages but still no "UDP packet
with bad csum was fragmented".
OK, last experiment :-) Add this patch, and watch to see if
the UDP "InE
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:55:42PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > - struct dqblk d;
> > + struct dqblk32 d;
>
> What does this fix? Things compile just fine without
> it and looking at the code it was intended to be of
> the
old_fs;
char *spec;
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL P
;
char *spec;
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:55:42PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Petru Paler writes:
- struct dqblk d;
+ struct dqblk32 d;
What does this fix? Things compile just fine without
it and looking at the code it was intended to be of
the original type.
Please explain exactly
e-threaded - unless someone can tell me that's a bad
> idea)
Keep it single threaded if you run on UP only...
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 04:53:40PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 09:38:40AM +0200, Petru Paler wrote:
> > This is one of the main thttpd design points: run in a select() loop. Since
> > it is intended for mainly static workloads, it performs quite well..
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 04:53:40PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 09:38:40AM +0200, Petru Paler wrote:
This is one of the main thttpd design points: run in a select() loop. Since
it is intended for mainly static workloads, it performs quite well...
It can't scale
f you run on UP only...
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
static workloads, it performs quite well...
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
workloads, it performs quite well...
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
?
Should I be worried about it or it's ok ?
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 02:57:21AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 13:10:33 +0200
>From: Petru Paler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>So should I apply your patch ?
>
> Yes, this
?
Should I be worried about it or it's ok ?
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 02:57:21AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 13:10:33 +0200
From: Petru Paler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So should I apply your patch ?
Yes, this new OOPS you've sent me is in the same
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 02:57:21AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 13:10:33 +0200
>From: Petru Paler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>So should I apply your patch ?
>
> Yes, this new OOPS you've sent me is in the same place.
Ok, applie
able
>>PC; 00449e94<=
>>O7; 00449f14
>>I7; 0044cfa8
3 warnings issued. Results may not be reliable.
So should I apply your patch ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Let me know if you need additional info or testing done.
Bug report (in standard format):
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
Repeated kernel oopses, after a while of functioning under
heavy load.
[2.] Full description of the
ften):
UDP: short packet: 1/48
or
UDP: short packet: 0/36
and a couple of:
sending pkt_too_big to self
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ: 41817235
-
what data is available
PC; 00449e94 zap_page_range+134/280 =
O7; 00449f14 zap_page_range+1b4/280
I7; 0044cfa8 do_munmap+268/300
3 warnings issued. Results may not be reliable.
So should I apply your patch ?
--
Petru Paler, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ppetru.net - ICQ
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 02:57:21AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 13:10:33 +0200
From: Petru Paler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So should I apply your patch ?
Yes, this new OOPS you've sent me is in the same place.
Ok, applied. Will email again when/if something shows
45 matches
Mail list logo
