Information about MMU

Hi, Can somebody point me where could I get the MMU(Memory management Unit) details ? Regards, Pravin -**Nihilent*** " *** All information contained in this communication is confidential, proprietary, privileged and is intended for the addressees only. If youhave

RE: [git patches] net driver updates #2

Hi, Can somebody point me where could I get the MMU(Memory management Unit) details ? Regards, Pravin -**Nihilent*** " *** All information contained in this communication is confidential, proprietary, privileged and is intended for the addressees only. If youhave

RE: [git patches] net driver updates #2

Hi, Can somebody point me where could I get the MMU(Memory management Unit) details ? Regards, Pravin -**Nihilent*** *** All information contained in this communication is confidential, proprietary, privileged and is intended for the addressees only. If youhave

Information about MMU

Hi, Can somebody point me where could I get the MMU(Memory management Unit) details ? Regards, Pravin -**Nihilent*** *** All information contained in this communication is confidential, proprietary, privileged and is intended for the addressees only. If youhave

RE: Bitops source problem

I have a CentOS 4.4 system with 2.6.9-42 kernel. I will update the kernel to the new one. Regards, Pravin -Original Message- From: Roland Dreier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 1:03 AM To: Pravin Nanaware Cc: John Hubbard; LKML Subject: Re: Bitops source

RE: Bitops source problem

Yes, indeed none of the atomic bit operations functions has LOCK_PREFIX in my version of Linux kernel. Regards, Pravin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roland Dreier Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 12:15 PM To: Pravin Nanaware Cc: John

RE: Bitops source problem

I have a CentOS 4.4 system with 2.6.9-42 kernel. I will update the kernel to the new one. Regards, Pravin -Original Message- From: Roland Dreier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 1:03 AM To: Pravin Nanaware Cc: John Hubbard; LKML Subject: Re: Bitops source

RE: Bitops source problem

"=m" (ADDR) :"Ir" (nr)); } Regards, Pravin -Original Message- From: John Hubbard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:17 AM To: Pravin Nanaware Cc: LKML Subject: Re: Bitops source problem Pravin Nanaware wrote: > Hi, > > I was just goi

Bitops source problem

Hi, I was just going through the include file in the /usr/include/asm/bitops.h The function description describes it as non-atomic but it seems it is not. static __inline__ void __change_bit(int nr, volatile void * addr) { __asm__ __volatile__( "btcl %1,%0"

Bitops source problem

Hi, I was just going through the include file in the /usr/include/asm/bitops.h The function description describes it as non-atomic but it seems it is not. static __inline__ void __change_bit(int nr, volatile void * addr) { __asm__ __volatile__( btcl %1,%0

RE: Bitops source problem

)); } Regards, Pravin -Original Message- From: John Hubbard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:17 AM To: Pravin Nanaware Cc: LKML Subject: Re: Bitops source problem Pravin Nanaware wrote: Hi, I was just going through the include file in the /usr/include