[PATCH 5/8] kernel-doc: fix pci-acpi warning

2008-02-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix PCI kernel-doc warning: Warning(linux-2.6.24-git12//drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c:166): No description found for parameter 'hid' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) ---

[PATCH 4/8] kernel-doc: fix drivers/base/ warnings

2008-02-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix drivers/base/ missing kernel-doc parameters: Warning(linux-2.6.24-git12//drivers/base/driver.c:133): No description found for parameter 'drv' Warning(linux-2.6.24-git12//drivers/base/driver.c:133): No description found for parameter 'kobj'

[PATCH 2/8] kernel-doc: fix block params and docbook

2008-02-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kernel-doc for block/: - add missing parameters - fix one function's parameter list (remove blank line) - add 2 source files to docbook for non-exported kernel-doc functions Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---

[PATCH 3/8] kernel-doc: fix mtrr warning

2008-02-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix mtrr kernel-doc warning: Warning(linux-2.6.24-git12//arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c:677): No description found for parameter 'end_pfn' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1

[PATCH 1/8] kernel-doc: fix audit warnings

2008-02-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix kernel-doc warnings in audit.c. Warning(linux-2.6.24-git12//kernel/audit.c:1268): No description found for parameter 'string' Warning(linux-2.6.24-git12//kernel/audit.c:1268): No description found for parameter 'len'` Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap

[PATCH 1/8] kernel-doc: fix audit warnings

2008-02-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fix kernel-doc warnings in audit.c. Warning(linux-2.6.24-git12//kernel/audit.c:1268): No description found for parameter 'string' Warning(linux-2.6.24-git12//kernel/audit.c:1268): No description found for parameter 'len'` Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap

[PATCH 2/8] kernel-doc: fix block params and docbook

2008-02-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] kernel-doc for block/: - add missing parameters - fix one function's parameter list (remove blank line) - add 2 source files to docbook for non-exported kernel-doc functions Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[PATCH 3/8] kernel-doc: fix mtrr warning

2008-02-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fix mtrr kernel-doc warning: Warning(linux-2.6.24-git12//arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c:677): No description found for parameter 'end_pfn' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1

[PATCH 4/8] kernel-doc: fix drivers/base/ warnings

2008-02-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fix drivers/base/ missing kernel-doc parameters: Warning(linux-2.6.24-git12//drivers/base/driver.c:133): No description found for parameter 'drv' Warning(linux-2.6.24-git12//drivers/base/driver.c:133): No description found for parameter 'kobj'

[PATCH 5/8] kernel-doc: fix pci-acpi warning

2008-02-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fix PCI kernel-doc warning: Warning(linux-2.6.24-git12//drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c:166): No description found for parameter 'hid' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) ---

[PATCH] docbook: rapidio: fix fatal filename error

2008-01-31 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix docbook fatal error (files were renamed): docproc: linux-2.6.24-git9/arch/ppc/kernel/rio.c: No such file or directory Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Documentation/DocBook/rapidio.tmpl |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3

[PATCH] docbook: rapidio: fix fatal filename error

2008-01-31 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fix docbook fatal error (files were renamed): docproc: linux-2.6.24-git9/arch/ppc/kernel/rio.c: No such file or directory Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Documentation/DocBook/rapidio.tmpl |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3

taskstats accounting info

2007-03-14 Thread Randy.Dunlap
Hi, Documentation/accounting/delay-accounting.txt says that the getdelays program has a "-c cmd" argument, but that option does not seem to exist in Documentation/account/getdelays.c. Do you have an updated version of getdelays.c? If not, please correct that documentation. Is getdelays.c the

Re: [Bug 8040] Hang before INIT when CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y

2007-03-14 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:13:25 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8040 > > > > > > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-14 03:13 --- > > Any news on that bug please ? > > None

Re: [Bug 8040] Hang before INIT when CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y

2007-03-14 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:13:25 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8040 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-14 03:13 --- Any news on that bug please ? None whatsoever. Three

taskstats accounting info

2007-03-14 Thread Randy.Dunlap
Hi, Documentation/accounting/delay-accounting.txt says that the getdelays program has a -c cmd argument, but that option does not seem to exist in Documentation/account/getdelays.c. Do you have an updated version of getdelays.c? If not, please correct that documentation. Is getdelays.c the best

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix some coding-style errors in autofs

2007-03-12 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix some coding-style errors in autofs > > Fix coding style errors (extra spaces, long lines) in autofs > and autofs4 files being modified for container/pidspace issues. > > --- >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix some coding-style errors in autofs

2007-03-12 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix some coding-style errors in autofs Fix coding style errors (extra spaces, long lines) in autofs and autofs4 files being modified for container/pidspace issues. ---

Re: Style Question

2007-03-11 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Mar 12 2007 13:37, Cong WANG wrote: > > > > The following code is picked from drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c: > > > > static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_load(struct kvm *kvm, int vcpu_slot) > > { > > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = >vcpus[vcpu_slot]; > > > >

Re: Style Question

2007-03-11 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Mar 12 2007 13:37, Cong WANG wrote: The following code is picked from drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c: static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_load(struct kvm *kvm, int vcpu_slot) { struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm-vcpus[vcpu_slot]; mutex_lock(vcpu-mutex);

Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-stable] cpuset semaphore double trip fix

2005-09-09 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 17:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Paul Jackson wrote: > Code reading uncovered a potential deadlock on the global cpuset > semaphore, cpuset_sem. > > ==> This patch is only useful in the 2.6.13-stable series. Paul, stable patch candidates should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris/Greg,

Re: List of things requested by lkml for reiser4 inclusion (to review)

2005-09-09 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Hans Reiser wrote: > Chris Shoemaker wrote: > > >On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:36:06AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: > > > > > >>If we lose every remaining point of this list, we can generate a patch > >>in a few days, because the VFS work was the only substantive (in coding >

Re: Debugging

2005-09-09 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Lares Moreau wrote: > OKay this is a noobie question, > > I have all the kernel debugging options turned. Now how do I change the > kernel logging level from prompt? Or do I? > > I have 'loglevel=7' appended to my kernel line in grub. Is that all I > need or is there more

Re: Debugging

2005-09-09 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Lares Moreau wrote: OKay this is a noobie question, I have all the kernel debugging options turned. Now how do I change the kernel logging level from prompt? Or do I? I have 'loglevel=7' appended to my kernel line in grub. Is that all I need or is there more to it?

Re: [PATCH 2.6.13-stable] cpuset semaphore double trip fix

2005-09-09 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 17:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Paul Jackson wrote: Code reading uncovered a potential deadlock on the global cpuset semaphore, cpuset_sem. == This patch is only useful in the 2.6.13-stable series. Paul, stable patch candidates should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris/Greg, maybe

Re: List of things requested by lkml for reiser4 inclusion (to review)

2005-09-09 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Hans Reiser wrote: Chris Shoemaker wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:36:06AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: If we lose every remaining point of this list, we can generate a patch in a few days, because the VFS work was the only substantive (in coding hours) task, and it

[PATCH] Doc: update oops-tracing.txt (Tainted flags)

2005-09-08 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Update Documentation/oops-tracing.txt: - add descriptions of 3 more "Tainted" flags; - fix some typos; Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Documentation/oops-tracing.txt | 25 + 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+),

[PATCH] Doc: update oops-tracing.txt (Tainted flags)

2005-09-08 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Update Documentation/oops-tracing.txt: - add descriptions of 3 more Tainted flags; - fix some typos; Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Documentation/oops-tracing.txt | 25 + 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8

Re: kbuild & C++

2005-09-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Esben Nielsen wrote: > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > On 9/6/05, Budde, Marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > for one of our customers I have to port a Windows driver to > > > Linux. Large parts of the driver's backend code consists of > > > C++.

Re: wakeup on lan enable without compiling as module

2005-09-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:53:38PM +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to build the 3c59x vortex module into the kernel (not as > > module) but don't loose the ability to use wakeup-on-lan. Because it > > seems to be impossible to

Re: nfs4 client bug

2005-09-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 11:21:09AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:40:53PM -0700, Bret Towe wrote: > > > > Pid: 14169, comm: xmms Tainte

Re: nfs4 client bug

2005-09-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:40:53PM -0700, Bret Towe wrote: > > Pid: 14169, comm: xmms Tainted: G M 2.6.13 > > Hm, can someone explain what that means? A proprietary module was > loaded then unloaded, maybe? 'M' means Machine Check, which sets the

Re: nfs4 client bug

2005-09-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:40:53PM -0700, Bret Towe wrote: Pid: 14169, comm: xmms Tainted: G M 2.6.13 Hm, can someone explain what that means? A proprietary module was loaded then unloaded, maybe? 'M' means Machine Check, which sets the

Re: nfs4 client bug

2005-09-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 11:21:09AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:40:53PM -0700, Bret Towe wrote: Pid: 14169, comm: xmms Tainted: G M 2.6.13 Hm, can someone explain

Re: wakeup on lan enable without compiling as module

2005-09-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Tony Breeds wrote: On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:53:38PM +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote: Hello, I would like to build the 3c59x vortex module into the kernel (not as module) but don't loose the ability to use wakeup-on-lan. Because it seems to be impossible to specify

Re: kbuild C++

2005-09-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Esben Nielsen wrote: On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote: On 9/6/05, Budde, Marco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, for one of our customers I have to port a Windows driver to Linux. Large parts of the driver's backend code consists of C++. How can I

Re: www.linux1394.org - ???

2005-09-02 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 23:35:14 -0500 art wrote: > www.linux1394.org - is this server/project dead ? The server is known dead and being worked on or replaced. News on linux1394 mailing list indicates that it should be back soon (or should have been back soon)... Stefan Richter has tarballs of his

Re: www.linux1394.org - ???

2005-09-02 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 23:35:14 -0500 art wrote: www.linux1394.org - is this server/project dead ? The server is known dead and being worked on or replaced. News on linux1394 mailing list indicates that it should be back soon (or should have been back soon)... Stefan Richter has tarballs of his

Re: [PATCH 2.6.13] Unhandled error condition in aic7xxx

2005-09-01 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 12:38:24 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote: > > This patch should handle the case when scsi_add_host() fails. > > Signed-Off-By: Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Index: linux-2.6.13/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c >

Re: 2.6.13 git snapshot patches still empty

2005-09-01 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 20:17:37 -0700 Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 02:19:51 +0100 Sid Boyce wrote: > > > For both -git1.gz/.bz2 and -git2.gz/.bz2. > > Yep, I think this is the fourth message about this. > It would be nice to get it fixed I suppose as a tempo

Re: 2.6.13 git snapshot patches still empty

2005-09-01 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 02:19:51 +0100 Sid Boyce wrote: > For both -git1.gz/.bz2 and -git2.gz/.bz2. Yep, I think this is the fourth message about this. It would be nice to get it fixed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: 2.6.13 git snapshot patches still empty

2005-09-01 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 02:19:51 +0100 Sid Boyce wrote: For both -git1.gz/.bz2 and -git2.gz/.bz2. Yep, I think this is the fourth message about this. It would be nice to get it fixed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: 2.6.13 git snapshot patches still empty

2005-09-01 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 20:17:37 -0700 Randy.Dunlap wrote: On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 02:19:51 +0100 Sid Boyce wrote: For both -git1.gz/.bz2 and -git2.gz/.bz2. Yep, I think this is the fourth message about this. It would be nice to get it fixed I suppose as a temporary measure (without daily

Re: [PATCH 2.6.13] Unhandled error condition in aic7xxx

2005-09-01 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 12:38:24 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote: This patch should handle the case when scsi_add_host() fails. Signed-Off-By: Daniel Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6.13/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c ===

Re: sr device can be written?

2005-08-31 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:07:55 +0800 jeff shia wrote: > but It seems that I can not open sr0 with openflags O_RDWR,why? > open("/dev/sr0",O_RDWR); > > It says:sr0 is a read only file sytem. > why? What media did you have in the drive? For me, with a CD-ROM, I get the same that you reported, but

Re: sr device can be written?

2005-08-31 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:07:55 +0800 jeff shia wrote: but It seems that I can not open sr0 with openflags O_RDWR,why? open(/dev/sr0,O_RDWR); It says:sr0 is a read only file sytem. why? What media did you have in the drive? For me, with a CD-ROM, I get the same that you reported, but with a

Re: GDT initialization and location question.

2005-08-30 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote: > * Pritesh Shah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > I was wondering as to where is the GDT initialized during the boot > > sequence? I will need the filename and the name of the routine that > > does this. Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Search for

Re: Kernel 2.6.13: TCP (libnet?)

2005-08-30 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Alan Cox wrote: > On Maw, 2005-08-30 at 15:41 -0400, John McGowan wrote: > > Kernel 2.6.13: TCP (libnet?) > > > > Broken libnet? > > > > KERNEL: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > LIBNET 1.1 (c) 1998 - 2004 Mike D. Schiffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > network bugs are best

Re: Linux-2.6.13 : __check_region is deprecated

2005-08-30 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, David Hollis wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 01:55 +0200, Diego Calleja wrote: > > El Tue, 30 Aug 2005 01:34:25 +0200, > > Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > > > I don't see why we should break a bunch of drivers by doing that. > > > Much better, in my oppinion,

Re: Linux-2.6.13 : __check_region is deprecated

2005-08-30 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, David Hollis wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 01:55 +0200, Diego Calleja wrote: El Tue, 30 Aug 2005 01:34:25 +0200, Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: I don't see why we should break a bunch of drivers by doing that. Much better, in my oppinion, to fix the few

Re: Kernel 2.6.13: TCP (libnet?)

2005-08-30 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Alan Cox wrote: On Maw, 2005-08-30 at 15:41 -0400, John McGowan wrote: Kernel 2.6.13: TCP (libnet?) Broken libnet? KERNEL: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org LIBNET 1.1 (c) 1998 - 2004 Mike D. Schiffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] network bugs are best reported to [EMAIL

Re: GDT initialization and location question.

2005-08-30 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote: * Pritesh Shah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I was wondering as to where is the GDT initialized during the boot sequence? I will need the filename and the name of the routine that does this. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Search for

Re: Linux-2.6.13 : __check_region is deprecated

2005-08-29 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Stephane Wirtel wrote: > Hi, > > By compiling my kernel, I can see that the __check_region function (in > kernel/resource.c) is deprecated. > > With a grep on the source code of the last release, I get this result. > > drivers/pnp/resource.c:255: if

Re: USB EHCI Problem with Low Speed Devices on kernel 2.6.11+

2005-08-29 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote: > On Monday 29 August 2005 01:16, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > > Dominik Wezel wrote: > > > Problem > > > === > > > When turning on the laptop and during POST and GrUB loading, all ports > > > on the hub are enabled. During the USB initialization

Re: USB EHCI Problem with Low Speed Devices on kernel 2.6.11+

2005-08-29 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote: On Monday 29 August 2005 01:16, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: Dominik Wezel wrote: Problem === When turning on the laptop and during POST and GrUB loading, all ports on the hub are enabled. During the USB initialization phase, when the

Re: Linux-2.6.13 : __check_region is deprecated

2005-08-29 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Stephane Wirtel wrote: Hi, By compiling my kernel, I can see that the __check_region function (in kernel/resource.c) is deprecated. With a grep on the source code of the last release, I get this result. drivers/pnp/resource.c:255: if

Re: help

2005-08-28 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:31:31 +0530 raja wrote: > I have subscribed in kernel newbie group.can anyone you please tell me > how can i post a question please. send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message

Re: help

2005-08-28 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:31:31 +0530 raja wrote: I have subscribed in kernel newbie group.can anyone you please tell me how can i post a question please. send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to

Re: kernel compile error in bootsplash.c

2005-08-27 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 19:53:35 +0200 (CEST) J. B. wrote: > I try to compile a 2.6.10 kernel but it stops with an error > in bootsplash.c. I have everything set in my .config file in /usr/src/linux > for bootsplash support. > > Anybody an idea. Where should i start to look? I am a newbie in

Re: kernel compile error in bootsplash.c

2005-08-27 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 19:53:35 +0200 (CEST) J. B. wrote: I try to compile a 2.6.10 kernel but it stops with an error in bootsplash.c. I have everything set in my .config file in /usr/src/linux for bootsplash support. Anybody an idea. Where should i start to look? I am a newbie in kernel

Re: compiling only one module in kernel version 2.6?

2005-08-18 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 19:42 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:54:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 01:48 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 2

Re: compiling only one module in kernel version 2.6?

2005-08-18 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 19:42 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:54:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 01:48 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 22:41 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: Sam

Re: compiling only one module in kernel version 2.6?

2005-08-17 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 01:54:50 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 01:48 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 22:41 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > Sam only added make .ko build support very recently, > > > so it could

Re: compiling only one module in kernel version 2.6?

2005-08-17 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 01:54:50 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 01:48 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 22:41 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: Sam only added make .ko build support very recently, so it could easily depend on what kernel verison Fong is using

Re: compiling only one module in kernel version 2.6?

2005-08-16 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:18:49 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 19:09 -0700, Fong Vang wrote: > > What's the easiest way to compile just one module in the Linux 2.6 kernel > > tree? > > > > This no longer seem to work: > > > > $ cd /usr/src/linux > > $ make

Re: compiling only one module in kernel version 2.6?

2005-08-16 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:18:49 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 19:09 -0700, Fong Vang wrote: What's the easiest way to compile just one module in the Linux 2.6 kernel tree? This no longer seem to work: $ cd /usr/src/linux $ make SUBDIRS=fs/reiserfs modules

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the big Documentation/Changes change

2005-08-09 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 03:17:40 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > I edited Documentation/Changes: > - remove obsolete information > - point to feature-list-2.6.txt instead of providing similar information > - removed the URLs of the software packages (people compiling their own > kernel usually know

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the big Documentation/Changes change

2005-08-09 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 03:17:40 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: I edited Documentation/Changes: - remove obsolete information - point to feature-list-2.6.txt instead of providing similar information - removed the URLs of the software packages (people compiling their own kernel usually know where to

Re: Freeing a dynamic struct cdev

2005-08-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 15:26:18 -0400 James C. Georgas wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 12:21 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 09:26:15 -0400 James C. Georgas wrote: > > > > > If I allocate a struct cdev using cdev_alloc(), what function do I call > &

Re: 2.6.13-rc5-git4 __handle_mm_fault

2005-08-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 12:28:53 +0200 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > Hi, > > tried to build mol-modules on my powerbook: > MODPOST > *** Warning: "__handle_mm_fault" > [/usr/src/modules/mol/src/kmod/Linux/../build/mol.ko] undefined! > > please cc me as I am not subscribed.

Re: Freeing a dynamic struct cdev

2005-08-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 09:26:15 -0400 James C. Georgas wrote: > If I allocate a struct cdev using cdev_alloc(), what function do I call > to free it when I'm done with it? Should be cdev_put(), which calls kobject_put(), which implements ref counting (using krefs), so that when the last reference

Re: 2.6.13-rc5-git4 __handle_mm_fault

2005-08-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 12:28:53 +0200 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: Hi, tried to build mol-modules on my powerbook: MODPOST *** Warning: __handle_mm_fault [/usr/src/modules/mol/src/kmod/Linux/../build/mol.ko] undefined! please cc me as I am not subscribed.

Re: Freeing a dynamic struct cdev

2005-08-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 09:26:15 -0400 James C. Georgas wrote: If I allocate a struct cdev using cdev_alloc(), what function do I call to free it when I'm done with it? Should be cdev_put(), which calls kobject_put(), which implements ref counting (using krefs), so that when the last reference is

Re: Freeing a dynamic struct cdev

2005-08-06 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 15:26:18 -0400 James C. Georgas wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 12:21 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 09:26:15 -0400 James C. Georgas wrote: If I allocate a struct cdev using cdev_alloc(), what function do I call to free it when I'm done

Re: make modules Segfault

2005-08-04 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 21:20:22 -0600 George Van Tuyl wrote: > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > [1.] One line summary of the problem: > >make modules failed Segfault (program cpp0) > > [2.] Full description of the problem/report: > > gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault

Re: make modules Segfault

2005-08-04 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 21:20:22 -0600 George Van Tuyl wrote: To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [1.] One line summary of the problem: make modules failed Segfault (program cpp0) [2.] Full description of the problem/report: gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cpp0)

Re: Documentation - how to apply patches for various trees

2005-08-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > Jesper Juhl wrote: > > >+Where can I download the patches? > > Maybe it would be useful to once again mention that local mirrors should be > used at least for stable releases and */testing/*. > > >+The 2.6.x kernels > [...] > >+# moving from 2.6.11 to

Re: Documentation - how to apply patches for various trees

2005-08-03 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: Jesper Juhl wrote: +Where can I download the patches? Maybe it would be useful to once again mention that local mirrors should be used at least for stable releases and */testing/*. +The 2.6.x kernels [...] +# moving from 2.6.11 to 2.6.12 +$ cd

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

2005-08-02 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:04:16 -0400 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Tuesday 02 August 2005 15:21, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > >> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > >> > > On

Re: Documentation - how to apply patches for various trees

2005-08-02 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote: > Hi, > > Looking forward to your feedback (and possible inclusion). > > I guess this document could also be placed somewhere on kernel.org and linked > to from the front page so that people downloading the various patches will > have this information

Re: Documentation - how to apply patches for various trees

2005-08-02 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote: Hi, Looking forward to your feedback (and possible inclusion). I guess this document could also be placed somewhere on kernel.org and linked to from the front page so that people downloading the various patches will have this information available at

Re: Testing RC kernels [KORG]

2005-08-02 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:04:16 -0400 Gene Heskett wrote: On Tuesday 02 August 2005 15:21, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Tue,

Re: 2.6.13-rc4-mm1

2005-07-31 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 02:05:52 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13-rc4/2.6.13-rc4-mm1/ > > - Dropped the connector patches: turns out that we no longer have a netlink > slot available for them anyway. I don't feel strongly pro or

Re: 2.6.13-rc4-mm1

2005-07-31 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 02:05:52 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13-rc4/2.6.13-rc4-mm1/ - Dropped the connector patches: turns out that we no longer have a netlink slot available for them anyway. I don't feel strongly pro or con

Re: file kernel/signal.c, 2 * array subscript out of range

2005-07-30 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:17:48 + d binderman wrote: > Hello there, > > I just tried to compile Redhat Fedora package > kernel-2.6.12-1.1435_FC5 with the Intel C compiler version 8.1 > > The compiler said > > kernel/signal.c(196): warning #175: subscript out of range > > The source code is >

Re: file kernel/signal.c, 2 * array subscript out of range

2005-07-30 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:17:48 + d binderman wrote: Hello there, I just tried to compile Redhat Fedora package kernel-2.6.12-1.1435_FC5 with the Intel C compiler version 8.1 The compiler said kernel/signal.c(196): warning #175: subscript out of range The source code is

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range -> io_remap_pfn_range

2005-07-28 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:57:51 +0100 Ian Pratt wrote: > > > Greg> Hm, you do realize that io_remap_pfn_range() is the same > > > Greg> thing as remap_pfn_range() on i386, right? > > > > > > Greg> So, why would this patch change anything? > > > > > > It's not the same thing under Xen.

Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range - io_remap_pfn_range

2005-07-28 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:57:51 +0100 Ian Pratt wrote: Greg Hm, you do realize that io_remap_pfn_range() is the same Greg thing as remap_pfn_range() on i386, right? Greg So, why would this patch change anything? It's not the same thing under Xen. I think this patch

Re: netdev watchdog

2005-04-21 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:21:30 -0700 Shaun Jackman wrote: | Upon booting my system, the boot fails and the following message is | displayed repeatedly: | | NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out | eth0: transmit timed out, tx_status 00 status eb01. | diagnostics: net 0cfa media 88c0 dma

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11] Documentation: correct minor mistake and remove redundant info from SubmittingPatches

2005-04-21 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:51:09 -0400 Cosmin Nicolaescu wrote: | The first fix is to reverse the order of the files being diffed. Since | we make the change in $MYFILE (and not $MYFILE.orig}, the diff should | have the .orig file first followed by $MYFILE (which has been | modified). But the patch

Re: [Gelato-technical] Re: Serious performance degradation on a RAID with kernel 2.6.10-bk7 and later

2005-04-21 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:33:29 -0700 David Mosberger wrote: | > On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:19:28 -0700, "Luck, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: | | >> I just checked 2.6.12-rc3 and the fls() fix is indeed missing. | >> Do you know what happened? | | Tony> If BitKeeper were still in use, I'd

Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2] aoe [1/6]: improve allowed interfaces configuration

2005-04-21 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:30:06 -0400 Ed L Cashin wrote: | Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:36:17AM -0400, Ed L Cashin wrote: | >> "Bodo Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >> | >> > Ed L Cashin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | >> > | >> >> +++

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3

2005-04-21 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:19:10 +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: | > It's available both as a patch (against 2.6.11) and as a tar-ball, and | Where IS the tarball? Not on www.kernel.org, that's for sure. in http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/ --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3

2005-04-21 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:19:10 +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: | It's available both as a patch (against 2.6.11) and as a tar-ball, and | Where IS the tarball? Not on www.kernel.org, that's for sure. in http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/ --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2] aoe [1/6]: improve allowed interfaces configuration

2005-04-21 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:30:06 -0400 Ed L Cashin wrote: | Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:36:17AM -0400, Ed L Cashin wrote: | Bodo Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Ed L Cashin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | +++

Re: [Gelato-technical] Re: Serious performance degradation on a RAID with kernel 2.6.10-bk7 and later

2005-04-21 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:33:29 -0700 David Mosberger wrote: | On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:19:28 -0700, Luck, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: | |I just checked 2.6.12-rc3 and the fls() fix is indeed missing. |Do you know what happened? | | Tony If BitKeeper were still in use, I'd have dropped

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11] Documentation: correct minor mistake and remove redundant info from SubmittingPatches

2005-04-21 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:51:09 -0400 Cosmin Nicolaescu wrote: | The first fix is to reverse the order of the files being diffed. Since | we make the change in $MYFILE (and not $MYFILE.orig}, the diff should | have the .orig file first followed by $MYFILE (which has been | modified). But the patch

Re: netdev watchdog

2005-04-21 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:21:30 -0700 Shaun Jackman wrote: | Upon booting my system, the boot fails and the following message is | displayed repeatedly: | | NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out | eth0: transmit timed out, tx_status 00 status eb01. | diagnostics: net 0cfa media 88c0 dma

Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/skfp/: fix LITTLE_ENDIAN

2005-04-20 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 04:17:08 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: | This patch fixes the LITTLE_ENDIAN #define. and a function prototype. | Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | --- | | drivers/net/skfp/h/osdef1st.h |2 ++ | drivers/net/skfp/smt.c|2 +- | 2 files changed, 3

Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2] aoe [5/6]: add firmware version to info in sysfs

2005-04-20 Thread Randy.Dunlap
| add firmware version to info in sysfs | | +static struct disk_attribute disk_attr_fwver = { | + .attr = {.name = "fwver", .mode = S_IRUGO }, | + .show = aoedisk_show_fwver | +}; | @@ -64,6 +76,7 @@ aoedisk_rm_sysfs(struct aoedev *d) | sysfs_remove_link(>gd->kobj, "state"); |

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >