Post, Mark K wrote:
I believe I've discovered an odd discrepancy between what is in the official
Linux BitKeeper repository, and what is on ftp.kernel.org. According to
BitKeeper, the last time linux/arch/s390/config.in and
linux/arch/s390x/config.in were changed is 17 months ago. What is in
Correct .text references to .init.data; init_intel_cacheinfo()
can be __init.
These are references to:
static struct _cache_table cache_table[] __initdata = ...;
Error: ./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.o .text refers to
008f R_386_32 .init.data
Error:
Hi Keith,
I'm seeing some drivers/*/built-in.o that should be ignored AFAIK,
but they are not ignored. Any ideas?
This is 2.6.11-rc1-bk3 on i386 with allmodconfig
(except DEBUG_INFO=n) and gcc 3.3.3.
Error: ./drivers/ide/built-in.o .text refers to 0939 R_386_PC32
.init.text
Error:
I suggest that we do a little defconfig module trimming.
Reduce number of modules built via defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diffstat:=
arch/i386/defconfig | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
Reduce number of modules built via
I suggest that we do a little defconfig module trimming.
Reduce number of modules built via defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diffstat:=
arch/x86_64/defconfig |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
Reduce number of modules built via defconfig.
Use correct data type for module_param:
drivers/media/radio/radio-typhoon.c:317: warning: return from
incompatible pointer type
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diffstat:=
drivers/media/radio/radio-typhoon.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
diff
Matthias Lang wrote:
Chris Wedgewood suggested handling this with a printk, to which Arjan
van de Ven asked
> but why
>
> if someone wants the stuff rejected in a posix confirm way, he can do
> these tests easily in the syscall wrapper he needs anyway for this
> function.
For negative
Matthias Lang wrote:
Chris Wedgewood suggested handling this with a printk, to which Arjan
van de Ven asked
but why
if someone wants the stuff rejected in a posix confirm way, he can do
these tests easily in the syscall wrapper he needs anyway for this
function.
For negative
Use correct data type for module_param:
drivers/media/radio/radio-typhoon.c:317: warning: return from
incompatible pointer type
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diffstat:=
drivers/media/radio/radio-typhoon.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
diff
I suggest that we do a little defconfig module trimming.
Reduce number of modules built via defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diffstat:=
arch/x86_64/defconfig |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
Reduce number of modules built via defconfig.
I suggest that we do a little defconfig module trimming.
Reduce number of modules built via defconfig.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diffstat:=
arch/i386/defconfig | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
Reduce number of modules built via
Hi Keith,
I'm seeing some drivers/*/built-in.o that should be ignored AFAIK,
but they are not ignored. Any ideas?
This is 2.6.11-rc1-bk3 on i386 with allmodconfig
(except DEBUG_INFO=n) and gcc 3.3.3.
Error: ./drivers/ide/built-in.o .text refers to 0939 R_386_PC32
.init.text
Error:
Correct .text references to .init.data; init_intel_cacheinfo()
can be __init.
These are references to:
static struct _cache_table cache_table[] __initdata = ...;
Error: ./arch/i386/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.o .text refers to
008f R_386_32 .init.data
Error:
Hi-
I'll suggest a few things for you.
cd to your linux tree and 'make modules'
Look at the gcc compile string there.
Try to copy it closely.
I added -I/path/to/linux/include and -D__KERNEL__
and compiled your module with no problem.
If you had included the complete messages, we
Hi-
I'll suggest a few things for you.
cd to your linux tree and 'make modules'
Look at the gcc compile string there.
Try to copy it closely.
I added -I/path/to/linux/include and -D__KERNEL__
and compiled your module with no problem.
If you had included the complete messages, we
Colin Bayer scribed:
| I have a Pentium III 933/133 (Coppermine, stepping 6) in an
Intel-manufactured
| i810 motherboard (hey, I
What mobo (model/name) is it?
Can you give us the output from "lspci -vv"?
| know it's a lame chipset, but it was on sale). On boot, the kernel
(version
| 2.4.6-pre8)
Colin Bayer scribed:
| I have a Pentium III 933/133 (Coppermine, stepping 6) in an
Intel-manufactured
| i810 motherboard (hey, I
What mobo (model/name) is it?
Can you give us the output from lspci -vv?
| know it's a lame chipset, but it was on sale). On boot, the kernel
(version
| 2.4.6-pre8)
~~~
OSDL (Open Source Development Lab) is offering a $25,000
Enterprise Achievement Award to the developer(s) of technological
advances in the field of enterprise Linux, pursuant to some
contest rules. The award will be issued to the
~~~
OSDL (Open Source Development Lab) is offering a $25,000
Enterprise Achievement Award to the developer(s) of technological
advances in the field of enterprise Linux, pursuant to some
contest rules. The award will be issued to the
http://www.kernelnewbies.org/documents/ then ProcFS guide.
~Randy
sebastien person wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to port a driver to 2.4, but it seem that proc use has changed.
> Is somebody have any docs about ?
>
> Thanks
>
> sebastien person
> -
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
http://www.kernelnewbies.org/documents/ then ProcFS guide.
~Randy
sebastien person wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to port a driver to 2.4, but it seem that proc use has changed.
Is somebody have any docs about ?
Thanks
sebastien person
-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Al's patch gives me:
videodev.c:550: warning: static declaration for `videodev_init' follows
non-static
videodev.c: In function `videodev_exit':
videodev.c:579: warning: implicit declaration of function
`videodev_proc_destroy'
Patch to use after Al's patch is attached.
~Randy
Alexander Viro
Al's patch gives me:
videodev.c:550: warning: static declaration for `videodev_init' follows
non-static
videodev.c: In function `videodev_exit':
videodev.c:579: warning: implicit declaration of function
`videodev_proc_destroy'
Patch to use after Al's patch is attached.
~Randy
Alexander Viro
Duncan Laurie wrote:
>
...
>
> The output you are looking for should look something like this:
>
> Device 00:0f.0 (slot 0): ISA bridge
> INTA: link 0x01, irq mask 0x0400 [10]
...
> Good luck, and feel free to send me the output from "dump_pirq"
> and "mptable" if it doesn't work..
Hi
Duncan Laurie wrote:
...
The output you are looking for should look something like this:
Device 00:0f.0 (slot 0): ISA bridge
INTA: link 0x01, irq mask 0x0400 [10]
...
Good luck, and feel free to send me the output from "dump_pirq"
and "mptable" if it doesn't work..
Hi Duncan,
501 - 525 of 525 matches
Mail list logo
