ls all 2.6.19+ versions. Results are same on both systems ,
so thats the reason I am thinking that there is some limit in kernel
>> On Jun 25 2007 12:41, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
>> >> > I am getting after initial successes some errors:
>> >> > "rtnl_ta
2.6.19+ versions. Results are same on both systems ,
so thats the reason I am thinking that there is some limit in kernel
On Jun 25 2007 12:41, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
I am getting after initial successes some errors:
rtnl_talk(): RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory
and
#ip addr
On 6/25/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 25 2007 12:41, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
>> > I am getting after initial successes some errors:
>> > "rtnl_talk(): RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory"
>> > and
>>
Hi
On 6/25/07, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 25 2007 11:47, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
>
> I am getting after initial successes some errors:
> "rtnl_talk(): RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory"
> and
> #ip addr | wc-l is 8194.
I'd be
B.
kernel is vanilla 2.6.20.7.
Try to see, what happens, when you increase the memory on your comp,
if an option.
--
Sincerely,
Robert Iakobashvili,
coroberti %x40 gmail %x2e com
...
http://curl-loader.sourceforge.net
A web testing and traffic gen
.
--
Sincerely,
Robert Iakobashvili,
coroberti %x40 gmail %x2e com
...
http://curl-loader.sourceforge.net
A web testing and traffic generation tool.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
Hi
On 6/25/07, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 25 2007 11:47, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
I am getting after initial successes some errors:
rtnl_talk(): RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory
and
#ip addr | wc-l is 8194.
I'd be surprised if it was 4096 on x86 and 8192
On 6/25/07, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 25 2007 12:41, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
I am getting after initial successes some errors:
rtnl_talk(): RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory
and
#ip addr | wc-l is 8194.
I'd be surprised if it was 4096 on x86 and 8192
t prevents from
> adding more IP addresses than 4096. What do I need to change in Linux
> kernel ( and then recompile ) to be able to add more IP addresses than
> 4K addresses per system? ..
How are you doing this?
Could it be some IPv6 issue like scope?
--
Sincerely,
Robert Iakobashvili,
c
ms. The maximum we added was 60K of secondary
IPv4 addresses. It consumes some memory, however.
We have also added thousands of IPv6. I will try to test, if there is any
limit for doing it.
--
Sincerely,
Robert Iakobashvili,
coroberti %x40 gmail %x2e com
...
IP addresses than 4096. What do I need to change in Linux
kernel ( and then recompile ) to be able to add more IP addresses than
4K addresses per system? ..
How are you doing this?
Could it be some IPv6 issue like scope?
--
Sincerely,
Robert Iakobashvili,
coroberti %x40 gmail %x2e com
of secondary
IPv4 addresses. It consumes some memory, however.
We have also added thousands of IPv6. I will try to test, if there is any
limit for doing it.
--
Sincerely,
Robert Iakobashvili,
coroberti %x40 gmail %x2e com
...
http://curl
12 matches
Mail list logo
