On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Martin Steigerwald
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In the light of
>
> * kdbus support is no longer compile-time optional. It is now
> always built-in. However, it can still be disabled at
a patch to remove all of that code would be welcome...
>
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Martin Steigerwald
mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
Hello!
In the light of
* kdbus support is no longer compile-time optional. It is now
always built-in. However, it can still be disabled at
a patch to remove all of that code would be welcome...
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>
>> what are we seeing here? a jfs bug?
>
> Can you trigger with the upstream kernel too? i.e. remove the grsec
> stuff and retry.
>
I will do that. Im building a new kernel as right now.
> Btw, your mail is somehow cutoff on the
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
snipped...
what are we seeing here? a jfs bug?
Can you trigger with the upstream kernel too? i.e. remove the grsec
stuff and retry.
I will do that. Im building a new kernel as right now.
Btw, your mail is somehow
on boot i get this half of the time:
[6.349867] general protection fault: [#1] SMP
[6.352177] Modules linked in: zram lz4_decompress lz4_compress unix
[6.354483] CPU: 1 PID: 112 Comm: udevd Not tainted 3.16.3-grsec-26 #2
[6.356583] Hardware name: Matsushita Electric
on boot i get this half of the time:
[6.349867] general protection fault: [#1] SMP
[6.352177] Modules linked in: zram lz4_decompress lz4_compress unix
[6.354483] CPU: 1 PID: 112 Comm: udevd Not tainted 3.16.3-grsec-26 #2
[6.356583] Hardware name: Matsushita Electric
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rogelio Serrano
Date: Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: A desktop environment[1] kernel wishlist
To: Bastien Nocera
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> How do I detect that the screen is visible on a tab
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rogelio Serrano rogelio.serr...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: A desktop environment[1] kernel wishlist
To: Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
How
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 13.08.2014 11:00, schrieb Borislav Petkov:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:27:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>
>>> And the thing is; we're all very busy so we tend to take the 'easy'
>>> way out for things like this; but wholesale
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 11:00, schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:27:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
And the thing is; we're all very busy so we tend to take the 'easy'
way out for things like this; but
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> I used to maintain busybox init, and am researching to do a "lunchd"
> on toybox (mdev is to udev as lunchd is to systemd, think "OSX launchd
> without the insane xml file formats", only with at least one less
> letter's worth of
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
snipped
I used to maintain busybox init, and am researching to do a lunchd
on toybox (mdev is to udev as lunchd is to systemd, think OSX launchd
without the insane xml file formats, only with at least one less
letter's worth
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>
>> I dont think the majority of linux kernel developers care about
>> enforcement at all. Its virtually public domain as far as i can see,
>> Linus himself will not run after violators.
>>
>> Any company out there is free to do what they
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
I dont think the majority of linux kernel developers care about
enforcement at all. Its virtually public domain as far as i can see,
Linus himself will not run after violators.
Any company out there is free to do what they
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:29 PM, luke.leighton wrote:
> this is a quick message to let people know that evidence has been
> collected of not just knowingly-infringing copyright but *blatant*
> copyright infringment [a la "bring it on, fuckers"] by transcend
> technologies. does anyone have any
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:29 PM, luke.leighton luke.leigh...@gmail.com wrote:
this is a quick message to let people know that evidence has been
collected of not just knowingly-infringing copyright but *blatant*
copyright infringment [a la bring it on, fuckers] by transcend
technologies. does
Hi Sarah,
kinda reminds me of... baboons... its natural among mammals i guess...
Why hierarchy creates a destructive force within the human psyche (by
dr. Robert Sapolsky)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4UMyTnlaMY=share
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sarah Sharp
wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jul
Hi Sarah,
kinda reminds me of... baboons... its natural among mammals i guess...
Why hierarchy creates a destructive force within the human psyche (by
dr. Robert Sapolsky)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4UMyTnlaMYfeature=share
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Sarah Sharp
On Jan 9, 2008 12:07 AM, Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One should always indicate the version of software when complaining. Well,
>
> $ uname -a
> Linux noi 2.6.14 #1 PREEMPT Sun Oct 30 20:18:48 EET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> I've tried upgrading, and failed: the megatonne
On Jan 9, 2008 12:07 AM, Tuomo Valkonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One should always indicate the version of software when complaining. Well,
$ uname -a
Linux noi 2.6.14 #1 PREEMPT Sun Oct 30 20:18:48 EET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
I've tried upgrading, and failed: the megatonne monolith with
20 matches
Mail list logo
