I noticed that this message goes away if I reboot my computer... So a
fresh boot it errors, on reboot it does not error.
On 7/10/07, Ryan Hope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ever since 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 I have been seeing these messages in dmesg:
ACPI: EC: Handler for query 0x80 is not found
Ever since 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 I have been seeing these messages in dmesg:
ACPI: EC: Handler for query 0x80 is not found!
ACPI: EC: Handler for query 0x81 is not found!
This did not happen in 2.6.22-rc4-mm1. Does anyone have any clue what
this is about?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Ever since 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 I have been seeing these messages in dmesg:
ACPI: EC: Handler for query 0x80 is not found!
ACPI: EC: Handler for query 0x81 is not found!
This did not happen in 2.6.22-rc4-mm1. Does anyone have any clue what
this is about?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
I noticed that this message goes away if I reboot my computer... So a
fresh boot it errors, on reboot it does not error.
On 7/10/07, Ryan Hope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ever since 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 I have been seeing these messages in dmesg:
ACPI: EC: Handler for query 0x80 is not found!
ACPI: EC
Ever since I started playing with suspend I started turning on PCI Hot
Plug support since then I have been seeing messages like whats
below from dmesg I'm not exactly sure how this actually impacts me
if it does at all. I just thought it didn't look exactly right so I
wanted to inquire
Ever since I started playing with suspend I started turning on PCI Hot
Plug support since then I have been seeing messages like whats
below from dmesg I'm not exactly sure how this actually impacts me
if it does at all. I just thought it didn't look exactly right so I
wanted to inquire
from what I understood, there is a performance loss in plugsched
schedulers because they have to share code
even if pluggable schedulers is not a viable option, being able to
choose which one was built into the kernel would be easy (only takes a
few ifdefs), i too think competition would be
from what I understood, there is a performance loss in plugsched
schedulers because they have to share code
even if pluggable schedulers is not a viable option, being able to
choose which one was built into the kernel would be easy (only takes a
few ifdefs), i too think competition would be
I didn't really know of a better place to ask this question, bus is
there any rhyme or reason to when -mm kernels are released? Is there a
-git repo that I can get work in progress for -mm?
-Ryan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
I didn't really know of a better place to ask this question, bus is
there any rhyme or reason to when -mm kernels are released? Is there a
-git repo that I can get work in progress for -mm?
-Ryan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
10 matches
Mail list logo
