On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:47:30PM +0530, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:45 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
>> >> The EDMA DMAC has a har
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:45 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
>> The EDMA DMAC has a hardware limitation that prevents supporting
>> scatter gather lists with any number of segments. Since the EDMA
>> DMA Engine driver sets
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> The EDMA DMAC has a hardware limitation that prevents supporting
> scatter gather lists with any number of segments. Since the EDMA
> DMA Engine driver sets the maximum segments to 16, we do the
> same.
>
> Note: this can be removed once the
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com wrote:
The EDMA DMAC has a hardware limitation that prevents supporting
scatter gather lists with any number of segments. Since the EDMA
DMA Engine driver sets the maximum segments to 16, we do the
same.
Note: this can be removed
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:45 PM, S, Venkatraman svenk...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com wrote:
The EDMA DMAC has a hardware limitation that prevents supporting
scatter gather lists with any number of segments. Since the EDMA
DMA Engine driver sets
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:47:30PM +0530, S, Venkatraman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:45 PM, S, Venkatraman svenk...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com wrote:
The EDMA DMAC has
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Hebbar, Gururaja
wrote:
> From: Vaibhav Bedia
>
> In some cases mmc_suspend_host() is not able to claim the
> host and proceed with the suspend process. The core returns
> -EBUSY to the host controller driver. Unfortunately, the
> host controller driver does not
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Peter Senna Tschudin
wrote:
> From: Peter Senna Tschudin
>
> Convert a nonnegative error return code to a negative one, as returned
> elsewhere in the function.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> follows:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Peter Senna Tschudin
peter.se...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Peter Senna Tschudin peter.se...@gmail.com
Convert a nonnegative error return code to a negative one, as returned
elsewhere in the function.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Hebbar, Gururaja
gururaja.heb...@ti.com wrote:
From: Vaibhav Bedia vaibhav.be...@ti.com
In some cases mmc_suspend_host() is not able to claim the
host and proceed with the suspend process. The core returns
-EBUSY to the host controller driver. Unfortunately,
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
> HSMMC IP on AM33xx need a special setting to handle High-speed cards.
> Other platforms like TI81xx, OMAP4 may need this as-well. This depends
> on the HSMMC IP timing closure done for the high speed cards.
>
> From AM335x TRM (SPRUH73F -
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Hebbar, Gururaja gururaja.heb...@ti.com wrote:
HSMMC IP on AM33xx need a special setting to handle High-speed cards.
Other platforms like TI81xx, OMAP4 may need this as-well. This depends
on the HSMMC IP timing closure done for the high speed cards.
From AM335x
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
> From: Vaibhav Bedia
>
> In some cases mmc_suspend_host() is not able to claim the
> host and proceed with the suspend process. The core returns
> -EBUSY to the host controller driver. Unfortunately, the
> host controller driver does not
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Hebbar, Gururaja gururaja.heb...@ti.com wrote:
From: Vaibhav Bedia vaibhav.be...@ti.com
In some cases mmc_suspend_host() is not able to claim the
host and proceed with the suspend process. The core returns
-EBUSY to the host controller driver. Unfortunately,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:58 PM, wrote:
>
> On Fri, July 27, 2012 2:07 am, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:24 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, July 26, 2012 8:28 am, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, wro
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:58 PM, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Fri, July 27, 2012 2:07 am, S, Venkatraman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:24 AM, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Thu, July 26, 2012 8:28 am, S, Venkatraman wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, me...@codeaurora.org wrote
the cost of providing
> DMA-capable buffer from upper caller(but on-stack buffer is allowed
> with no performance gain).
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungsik Lee
> Signed-off-by: S, Venkatraman
I don't think my sign off is warranted. I gave just an illustration.
You can add my
Re
of providing
DMA-capable buffer from upper caller(but on-stack buffer is allowed
with no performance gain).
Signed-off-by: Kyungsik Lee kyungsik@lge.com
Signed-off-by: S, Venkatraman svenk...@ti.com
I don't think my sign off is warranted. I gave just an illustration.
You can add my
Reviewed
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Kyungsik Lee wrote:
> It is expected that Extended CSD register(the size of this register
> is larger than CID/CSD) will be referenced more frequently as more
> fields have been added to Extended CSD and it seems that it is not
> a good option to double the memory
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Kyungsik Lee kyungsik@lge.com wrote:
It is expected that Extended CSD register(the size of this register
is larger than CID/CSD) will be referenced more frequently as more
fields have been added to Extended CSD and it seems that it is not
a good option to
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Kyungsik Lee wrote:
> It is expected that Extended CSD register(the size of this register
> is larger than CID/CSD) will be referenced more frequently as more
> fields have been added to Extended CSD and it seems that it is not
> a good option to double the memory
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Kyungsik Lee kyungsik@lge.com wrote:
It is expected that Extended CSD register(the size of this register
is larger than CID/CSD) will be referenced more frequently as more
fields have been added to Extended CSD and it seems that it is not
a good option to
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:24 AM, wrote:
>
> On Thu, July 26, 2012 8:28 am, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, wrote:
>>> On Mon, July 23, 2012 5:22 am, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:13 PM, wrote:
>>>>
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:24 AM, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Thu, July 26, 2012 8:28 am, S, Venkatraman wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Mon, July 23, 2012 5:22 am, S, Venkatraman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:13 PM, me...@codeaurora.org wrote
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
> This feature delete the unmap memory region of the eMMC card,
> by writing to a specific register in the EXT_CSD
> unmap region is the memory region that were previously deleted
> (by erase, trim or discard operation)
>
> Signed-off-by: Yaniv
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, July 23, 2012 5:22 am, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:13 PM, wrote:
>>> On Wed, July 18, 2012 12:26 am, Chris Ball wrote:
>>>> Hi, [removing Jens and the documentation list, since now we're
>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:42 PM, vinayak holikatti
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:02 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Vinayak Holikatti
>> wrote:
>>> This patch set adds following features
>>> - Seggregate PCI specific code
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Vinayak Holikatti
wrote:
> This patch set adds following features
> - Seggregate PCI specific code in ufshcd.c
> - Adds PCI glue driver ufshcd-pci.c and ufshcd.c become core module
> - Adds Platform glue driver ufshcd-pltfrm.c
> - Update correct transfer size
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Vinayak Holikatti
vinholika...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch set adds following features
- Seggregate PCI specific code in ufshcd.c
- Adds PCI glue driver ufshcd-pci.c and ufshcd.c become core module
- Adds Platform glue driver ufshcd-pltfrm.c
- Update
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:42 PM, vinayak holikatti
vinholika...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:02 PM, S, Venkatraman svenk...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Vinayak Holikatti
vinholika...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch set adds following features
- Seggregate PCI
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Mon, July 23, 2012 5:22 am, S, Venkatraman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:13 PM, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Wed, July 18, 2012 12:26 am, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi, [removing Jens and the documentation list, since now we're
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Yaniv Gardi yga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
This feature delete the unmap memory region of the eMMC card,
by writing to a specific register in the EXT_CSD
unmap region is the memory region that were previously deleted
(by erase, trim or discard operation)
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:13 PM, wrote:
> On Wed, July 18, 2012 12:26 am, Chris Ball wrote:
>> Hi, [removing Jens and the documentation list, since now we're
>> talking about the MMC side only]
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18 2012, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>>> Is there anything else that holds this
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:13 PM, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On Wed, July 18, 2012 12:26 am, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi, [removing Jens and the documentation list, since now we're
talking about the MMC side only]
On Wed, Jul 18 2012, me...@codeaurora.org wrote:
Is there anything else that holds
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jul 15 2012, Muthu Kumar wrote:
>>> I've already replied to a later version of the patch, but just to get
>>> this comment in at the appropriate point of the discussion as well:
>>>
>>> Even though it would result in a cleaner
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 15 2012, Muthu Kumar wrote:
I've already replied to a later version of the patch, but just to get
this comment in at the appropriate point of the discussion as well:
Even though it would result in a cleaner
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:31 AM, wrote:
> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2012-07-10-16-59 has been uploaded to
>
>http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
>
>
> * drivers-scsi-ufs-use-module_pci_driver.patch
> * drivers-scsi-ufs-reverse-the-ufshcd_is_device_present-logic.patch
> *
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:31 AM, a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2012-07-10-16-59 has been uploaded to
http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
* drivers-scsi-ufs-use-module_pci_driver.patch
* drivers-scsi-ufs-reverse-the-ufshcd_is_device_present-logic.patch
*
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> If platform_get_resource_by_name() fails, driver probe is aborted an
> should return an error so the driver is not bound to the device.
>
> However, in the current error path of platform_get_resource_by_name(),
> probe returns zero since the
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
If platform_get_resource_by_name() fails, driver probe is aborted an
should return an error so the driver is not bound to the device.
However, in the current error path of platform_get_resource_by_name(),
probe returns zero
40 matches
Mail list logo
