Tejun Heo wrote:
> Michael Sedkowski wrote:
> > Dnia 07-08-2007, Wt o godzinie 15:56 +0900, Tejun Heo napisał(a):
> >> 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age
> >> Always - 388
[snip]
> On power off, the r/w heads in a disk should be unloaded (parked). This
>
Tejun Heo wrote:
Michael Sedkowski wrote:
Dnia 07-08-2007, Wt o godzinie 15:56 +0900, Tejun Heo napisał(a):
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age
Always - 388
[snip]
On power off, the r/w heads in a disk should be unloaded (parked). This
is usually
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The interrupts are only claimed when the port is
> actually opened, so if
> only one port was open, you'll only see one
> appearing in /proc/interrupts.
Get it.
Thanks so much,
Sam
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but it's not. We need PPC folk to fix their
> SERIAL_PORT_DFNS and remove obsolete stuff like
> RS_TABLE_SIZE.
Hope Mark could take care this change. I have no
sandpoint board at hand:-)
I removed RS_TABLE_SIZE on my target successfully
and happened to
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but it's not. We need PPC folk to fix their
SERIAL_PORT_DFNS and remove obsolete stuff like
RS_TABLE_SIZE.
Hope Mark could take care this change. I have no
sandpoint board at hand:-)
I removed RS_TABLE_SIZE on my target successfully
and happened to
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The interrupts are only claimed when the port is
actually opened, so if
only one port was open, you'll only see one
appearing in /proc/interrupts.
Get it.
Thanks so much,
Sam
Start
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, in this case, the "whinging" resulted in
> finding a _real_ bug and locating why your ports
> weren't being found. So I guess it's
> good for something.
Indeed! The old kernel didn't have such an advantage.
> Can you mail me a diff of the changes
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> v. whining
>
> 1. To utter a plaintive, high-pitched,
> protracted sound, as in pain,
>fear, supplication, or complaint.
> 2. To complain or protest in a childish fashion.
> 3. To produce a sustained noise of relatively
> high pitch:
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
v. whining
1. To utter a plaintive, high-pitched,
protracted sound, as in pain,
fear, supplication, or complaint.
2. To complain or protest in a childish fashion.
3. To produce a sustained noise of relatively
high pitch: jet engines
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, in this case, the whinging resulted in
finding a _real_ bug and locating why your ports
weren't being found. So I guess it's
good for something.
Indeed! The old kernel didn't have such an advantage.
Can you mail me a diff of the changes you made
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, if you merely lifted the later 8250.c and
> put it into a previous kernel (which looks like the
> case), there's other changes in addition which are
> required.
Good catch. I tried 2.6.13-rc1 and the newest version
2.6.13-rc3 on the same
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, if you merely lifted the later 8250.c and
put it into a previous kernel (which looks like the
case), there's other changes in addition which are
required.
Good catch. I tried 2.6.13-rc1 and the newest version
2.6.13-rc3 on the same
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> It works for me on my platforms here, and everyone
> else on x86. I even had a situation where I had
> NR_UARTS set to 64 but only one registered... which
> also worked fine with no extraneous kernel messages.
But seems not functional on PowerPC
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
It works for me on my platforms here, and everyone
else on x86. I even had a situation where I had
NR_UARTS set to 64 but only one registered... which
also worked fine with no extraneous kernel messages.
But seems not functional on PowerPC
14 matches
Mail list logo
