Re: mke2fs and kernel VM issues

2001-02-16 Thread Samuel Flory
Tigran Aivazian wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Samuel Flory wrote: > > > What is believed to be the current status of the typical mke2fs > > crashes/hangs due to vm issues? I can reliably reproduce the issue on a > > heavily modifed VA kernel based on 2.2.1

Re: mke2fs and kernel VM issues

2001-02-16 Thread Samuel Flory
Alan Cox wrote: > > > heavily modifed VA kernel based on 2.2.18. Is there a kernel which is > > believed to be a known good kernel? (both 2.2.x and 2.4.x) > > I've not seen the problem on unmodified 2.2.18. The 2.2.17/18 VM does have > its problems but not these. 2.2.19pre3 and higher have

Re: mke2fs and kernel VM issues

2001-02-16 Thread Samuel Flory
Tigran Aivazian wrote: On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Samuel Flory wrote: What is believed to be the current status of the typical mke2fs crashes/hangs due to vm issues? I can reliably reproduce the issue on a heavily modifed VA kernel based on 2.2.18. Is there a kernel which is believed

Re: mke2fs and kernel VM issues

2001-02-16 Thread Samuel Flory
Alan Cox wrote: heavily modifed VA kernel based on 2.2.18. Is there a kernel which is believed to be a known good kernel? (both 2.2.x and 2.4.x) I've not seen the problem on unmodified 2.2.18. The 2.2.17/18 VM does have its problems but not these. 2.2.19pre3 and higher have the Andrea

mke2fs and kernel VM issues

2001-02-15 Thread Samuel Flory
What is believed to be the current status of the typical mke2fs crashes/hangs due to vm issues? I can reliably reproduce the issue on a heavily modifed VA kernel based on 2.2.18. Is there a kernel which is believed to be a known good kernel? (both 2.2.x and 2.4.x) Failure pattern: System:

mke2fs and kernel VM issues

2001-02-15 Thread Samuel Flory
What is believed to be the current status of the typical mke2fs crashes/hangs due to vm issues? I can reliably reproduce the issue on a heavily modifed VA kernel based on 2.2.18. Is there a kernel which is believed to be a known good kernel? (both 2.2.x and 2.4.x) Failure pattern: System:

Re: [reiserfs-list] NFS and reiserfs

2001-02-05 Thread Samuel Flory
could help with. http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=14 Josh Durham wrote: > > Any problems with NFSv3? I had tons of issues, but NFSv2 seems to work > just fine. It was with SGI clients. > > - Josh > > On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Samuel Flory wrote: > > > Dirk Mueller

Re: [reiserfs-list] NFS and reiserfs

2001-02-05 Thread Samuel Flory
Dirk Mueller wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Feb 2001, Grahame Jordan wrote: > > > Should I convert all of my NFS filesystems to ext2 or is there another > > option? > > If you use kernel 2.4.x: there are patches for NFS support. > You can also try the rpms below. They seem to work for me, but your

Re: [reiserfs-list] NFS and reiserfs

2001-02-05 Thread Samuel Flory
Dirk Mueller wrote: On Mon, 05 Feb 2001, Grahame Jordan wrote: Should I convert all of my NFS filesystems to ext2 or is there another option? If you use kernel 2.4.x: there are patches for NFS support. You can also try the rpms below. They seem to work for me, but your results

Re: [reiserfs-list] NFS and reiserfs

2001-02-05 Thread Samuel Flory
could help with. http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=14 Josh Durham wrote: Any problems with NFSv3? I had tons of issues, but NFSv2 seems to work just fine. It was with SGI clients. - Josh On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Samuel Flory wrote: Dirk Mueller wrote: On Mon, 05 Feb 2001, Grahame