Hi Randy,
Thanks for the comments, will send a V2 fixing them.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 11:18:52PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/15/20 11:11 PM, sathn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> > From: Satheesh Rajendran
> >
> > Add document entry for kvm_cma_resv_ratio kernel pa
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 09:55:23PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Srikar Dronamraju writes:
> > Current code assumes that cpumask of cpus sharing a l2-cache mask will
> > always be a superset of cpu_sibling_mask.
> >
> > Lets stop that assumption. cpu_l2_cache_mask is a superset of
> > cpu_sibli
this series:
# dmesg|grep smp
[0.067744] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
[5.416910] smp: Brought up 1 node, 2048 CPUs
Tested-by: Satheesh Rajendran
Regards,
-Satheesh
>
> Architecture:ppc64le
> Byte Order: Little Endian
> CPU(s): 160
>
wed-by: Laurent Dufour
Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Rajendran
---
V2:
Added Reviewed by Thiago and Laurent.
Added Fixes tag as per Thiago suggest.
V1:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20200609105731.14032-1-sathn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
--
by: Thiago Jung Bauermann
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Rajendran
---
V2:
Added reviewed by Thiago.
Dropped align argument as per Michael suggest.
Modified commit msg.
V1:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20200609113909.17236-1-sathn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
---
arch/powerpc/ker
Argument "align" in alloc_shared_lppaca() function was unused inside the
function. Let's fix it and update code comment.
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann
Cc: Ram Pai
Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Cc: Laurent Dufour
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Rajendran
--
pSeries
which is not necessary, let's remove it.
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann
Cc: Ram Pai
Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Cc: Laurent Dufour
Signed-off-by: Satheesh Rajendran
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
ox(mentioned in Note)
and
your below patch helped solving that for my environment and
am able to boot the system fine.
...
Fedora 31 (Thirty One)
Kernel 5.7.0-gd6f9469a0-dirty on an ppc64le (hvc0)
login:
Tested-by: Satheesh Rajendran
Note: for the record, here is the boot failure call trace.
ppc/merge branch latest commit 850f6274c5b5 was failing to boot IBM
Power8 Box, and the failure got resolved with this patch.
https://github.com/linuxppc/issues/issues/254
# git log -2 --oneline
0e0f55b31ea8 (HEAD -> issue_254) recordmcount: Fix spurious mcount entries on
powerpc
850f6274c5b5 (origin/me
Hi Firoz,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 02:32:45PM +0530, Firoz Khan wrote:
> The purpose of this patch series is, we can easily
> add/modify/delete system call table support by cha-
> nging entry in syscall.tbl file instead of manually
> changing many files. The other goal is to unify the
> system cal
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:41:35AM +0530, Firoz Khan wrote:
> The purpose of this patch series is, we can easily
> add/modify/delete system call table support by cha-
> nging entry in syscall.tbl file instead of manually
> changing many files. The other goal is to unify the
> system call table gen
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 08:51:57AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05 2018 at 5:25am -0500,
> Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > Linus Torvalds writes:
> > ...
> > > Mike Snitzer (1):
> > > device mapper updates
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Replying here because I can't find the device-ma
Commit-ID: 321a7c35c90cc834851ceda18a8ee18f1d032b92
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/321a7c35c90cc834851ceda18a8ee18f1d032b92
Author: Satheesh Rajendran
AuthorDate: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 22:13:53 +0530
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
CommitDate: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:28:10 -0300
perf
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 21:39 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > sum += nr;
> > }
> > BUG_ON(nr_min > nr_max);
> > -
> > BUG_ON(sum > g->p.nr_tasks);
>
> Looks like that change to remove a blank line did slip in, but that's
> a
> small nit. Apart from that, the patch lo
Hi Arnaldo,Please find my reply inline.
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 12:26 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 08:46:58PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao escreveu:
> >
> > On 2017/08/21 10:17AM, sathn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> > >
> &
Hi Naveen,Thanks for detailed review, my comments inline.
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 20:44 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Hi Satheesh,
>
> On 2017/08/21 10:15AM, sathn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> >
> > From: Satheesh Rajendran
> >
> > Added functions 1) to
Hi Naveen,
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 20:46 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>
> > }
> > BUG_ON(nr_min > nr_max);
> > -
> Looks like an un-necessary change there.
>
> - Naveen
>
I had hit with this compilation error, so had to move the
initialization above.
Please advice. Thanks.
CC ben
Hi Arnaldo,
Please let me know if any further comments.
Thanks in advance :-)
Regards,
-Satheesh.On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 15:45 +0530, sathn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> From: Satheesh Rajendran
>
> Certain systems would have sparse/discontinguous
> numa nodes.
> perf bench n
Thanks Arnaldo for the detailed review :-)
Will address them and send across v2. On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 16:22 -0300,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:58:49PM +0530, sathn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> escreveu:
> >
> > From: Satheesh Rajendran
> >
19 matches
Mail list logo
