Regards,
Satoru
>> -Original Message-
>> From: linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org
>> [mailto:linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of dormando
>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 9:01 PM
>> To: Rik van Riel
>> Cc: Randy Dunlap; Satoru Moriya; linux-ke
viour is implicit and not obvious from the
> way the code is organized. At least make it apparent in the code flow
> and document the conditions. It will be it easier to come up with
> sane semantics later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner
Reviewed-by: Satoru Moriya
er is in trouble... The mail I sent
yesterday has not been delivered yet.
Anyway, this is good for me.
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Satoru Moriya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 12/14/2012 10:43 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 12/14/2012 03:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
>> I can answer the later. Because memsw comes with its price and
>> swappiness is much cheaper. On the other hand it makes sense that
>> swappiness==0 doesn't swap at all. Or do you think we should get ba
On 12/14/2012 03:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 13-12-12 23:50:30, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:25:43PM +0000, Satoru Moriya wrote:
>>>
>>> I introduced swappiness check here with fe35004f because, in some
>>> cases, we prefer OOM
On 12/13/2012 11:05 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:> On Thu 13-12-12 16:29:59, Michal
Hocko wrote:
>> On Thu 13-12-12 10:34:20, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:43:34PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
When a reclaim scanner is doing its final scan before giving up and
there is sw
6 matches
Mail list logo
