--class os
$menuentry_id_option '...' {
...
submenu 'Advanced options for Ubuntu' $menuentry_id_option '...' {
...
menuentry 'ktest' {
...
===
Correct it by taking submenu entries into account in get_grub2_index().
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeu...@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/k
--class os
$menuentry_id_option '...' {
...
submenu 'Advanced options for Ubuntu' $menuentry_id_option '...' {
...
menuentry 'ktest' {
...
===
Correct it by taking submenu entries into account in get_grub2_index().
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi
---
tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl | 2 +-
1 file ch
e. To prevent overflow, this parameter
should be equal to or smaller than the max value of sector_t >> 11, 10 bits
are for 1024 and 1 bit is for sign bit.
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeu...@gmail.com>
---
drivers/block/brd.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --gi
e. To prevent overflow, this parameter
should be equal to or smaller than the max value of sector_t >> 11, 10 bits
are for 1024 and 1 bit is for sign bit.
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi
---
drivers/block/brd.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/block/brd.c b/driver
2017-08-11 19:07 GMT+09:00 Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:54:01AM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
>> # I'm a LKML subscriber, but not a x86 list subscriber
>>
>> I found the following new linux kernel bugzilla about Ryzen related proble
2017-08-11 19:07 GMT+09:00 Borislav Petkov :
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:54:01AM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
>> # I'm a LKML subscriber, but not a x86 list subscriber
>>
>> I found the following new linux kernel bugzilla about Ryzen related problem.
>> Since
# I'm a LKML subscriber, but not a x86 list subscriber
I found the following new linux kernel bugzilla about Ryzen related problem.
Since many developers don't check this bugzilla and I've also
encountered this problem,
I decided to introduce this problem here.
# I'm a LKML subscriber, but not a x86 list subscriber
I found the following new linux kernel bugzilla about Ryzen related problem.
Since many developers don't check this bugzilla and I've also
encountered this problem,
I decided to introduce this problem here.
At Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:34:06 +0200,
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 27/04/2017 02:42, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> > At Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:58:27 +0200,
> >> On 26/04/2017 13:47, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> >>> OK, here it is.
> >>
> >> It look
At Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:34:06 +0200,
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 27/04/2017 02:42, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> > At Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:58:27 +0200,
> >> On 26/04/2017 13:47, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> >>> OK, here it is.
> >>
> >> It look
At Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:58:27 +0200,
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 26/04/2017 13:47, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> > OK, here it is.
>
> It looks like the cause is that AMD has removed TBM instructions
> compared to e.g. Piledriver, so libvirt resorts to a much older b
At Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:58:27 +0200,
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 26/04/2017 13:47, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> > OK, here it is.
>
> It looks like the cause is that AMD has removed TBM instructions
> compared to e.g. Piledriver, so libvirt resorts to a much older b
At Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:58:50 +0900,
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 2017-04-24 22:09 GMT+09:00 Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeu...@gmail.com>:
> > At Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:48:46 +0200,
> > Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 24,
At Tue, 25 Apr 2017 23:58:50 +0900,
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 2017-04-24 22:09 GMT+09:00 Satoru Takeuchi :
> > At Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:48:46 +0200,
> > Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:39:12PM +0900, Satoru Takeuc
At Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:48:22 +0200,
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 25/04/2017 11:36, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Looking at CR4: 003006f0, it doesn't have OSXSAVE set. I.e., bit
> > 18. And when that bit is not set, VMOVDQA raises an #UD.
> >
> > And for some reason qemu doesn't like
At Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:48:22 +0200,
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 25/04/2017 11:36, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Looking at CR4: 003006f0, it doesn't have OSXSAVE set. I.e., bit
> > 18. And when that bit is not set, VMOVDQA raises an #UD.
> >
> > And for some reason qemu doesn't like
At Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:48:46 +0200,
Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:39:12PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> > I used the following auto-test tool (its backend is ktest).
> >
> > https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/elkdat
> >
>
At Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:48:46 +0200,
Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:39:12PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> > I used the following auto-test tool (its backend is ktest).
> >
> > https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/elkdat
> >
>
At Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:07:53 +0200,
Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 03:58:05PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> > Recently I bought a new Ryzen machine. When I tried to test v4.11-rc8 on
> > it, it failed to boot
> > with
At Mon, 24 Apr 2017 13:07:53 +0200,
Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 03:58:05PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> > Recently I bought a new Ryzen machine. When I tried to test v4.11-rc8 on
> > it, it failed to boot
> > with
At Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:58:05 +0900,
Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> Recently I bought a new Ryzen machine. When I tried to test v4.11-rc8 on it,
> it failed to boot
> with the following panic log.
>
> ```
> ...
> [0.227720] raid6: sse2x1 gen() 7985 MB/s
>
At Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:58:05 +0900,
Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> Recently I bought a new Ryzen machine. When I tried to test v4.11-rc8 on it,
> it failed to boot
> with the following panic log.
>
> ```
> ...
> [0.227720] raid6: sse2x1 gen() 7985 MB/s
>
Recently I bought a new Ryzen machine. When I tried to test v4.11-rc8 on it, it
failed to boot
with the following panic log.
```
...
[0.227720] raid6: sse2x1 gen() 7985 MB/s
[0.295709] raid6: sse2x1 xor() 8181 MB/s
[0.363706] raid6: sse2x2 gen() 17531 MB/s
[0.431699]
Recently I bought a new Ryzen machine. When I tried to test v4.11-rc8 on it, it
failed to boot
with the following panic log.
```
...
[0.227720] raid6: sse2x1 gen() 7985 MB/s
[0.295709] raid6: sse2x1 xor() 8181 MB/s
[0.363706] raid6: sse2x2 gen() 17531 MB/s
[0.431699]
://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/linux-kernel-statistics/blob/master/README.md
Thanks,
Satoru
://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/linux-kernel-statistics/blob/master/README.md
Thanks,
Satoru
of the corresponding bitmasks
are changed
- to make the meaning of this limit clear
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeu...@gmail.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
index 4
of the corresponding bitmasks
are changed
- to make the meaning of this limit clear
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi
---
kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
index 4885132..576b184 100644
--- a/kernel
```
For more information, please refer to the following URL.
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/elkdat
Thanks,
Satoru
```
For more information, please refer to the following URL.
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/elkdat
Thanks,
Satoru
Since __GFP_NOACCOUNT is removed by the following commit,
its description is not necessary.
commit 20b5c3039863 ("Revert 'gfp: add __GFP_NOACCOUNT'")
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_sat...@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
include/linux/gfp.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletion
Since __GFP_NOACCOUNT is removed by the following commit,
its description is not necessary.
commit 20b5c3039863 ("Revert 'gfp: add __GFP_NOACCOUNT'")
Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi
---
include/linux/gfp.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/inc
135 fail: 0
> Qemu tests:
> total: 27 pass: 27 fail: 0
>
> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
>
> Guenter
Plus, this kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel wit
at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
Guenter
Plus, this kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result
e latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel
.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/version-test
datetime.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM
time.
>
> I reproduced ENOMEM case with the following script (need
> CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC, and CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION_DEBUG_FS).
I confirmed that this problem reproduce with 3.19-rc3 and
not reproduce with 3.19-rc3 with your patch.
Tested-by: Satoru Takeuchi
Thank you for r
ENOMEM case with the following script (need
CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC, and CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION_DEBUG_FS).
I confirmed that this problem reproduce with 3.19-rc3 and
not reproduce with 3.19-rc3 with your patch.
Tested-by: Satoru Takeuchi takeuchi_sat...@jp.fujitsu.com
Thank you for reporting
l:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
- mem
.
Responses should be made by Wed Dec 31 12:00:00 UTC 2014.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
This kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru
.12.31-rc1.xz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (ke
below.
This kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru
test results:
> > > total: 30 pass: 30 fail: 0
> > >
> > > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
> >
> > Thanks for testing all 3 of these and letting me know.
>
> All 4, sorry...
Those 4 kernels also passd my test.
- Te
also passd my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org
anks for testing all 3 of these and letting me know.
Plus, all these kernels passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result
the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/version-test
datetime.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy
ssed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux
the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/version-test
datetime.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian
nel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debi
://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/version-test
datetime.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
- memory
Hi,
I revised ktest documentation.
v1.1.2->v1.1.3: Support not only debian/jessy, but also CentOS7 as target system
http://www.slideshare.net/satorutakeuchi18/kernel-auto-testbyktest
It's not the ktest reference guild, but the quick learning guild of ktest
especially focuses on some important
Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz
- Build E
from the stable-3.12-queue branch in your
repository at kernel.org.
Thanks,
Guenter
Plus, this kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test
Hi,
I revised ktest documentation.
v1.1.2-v1.1.3: Support not only debian/jessy, but also CentOS7 as target system
http://www.slideshare.net/satorutakeuchi18/kernel-auto-testbyktest
It's not the ktest reference guild, but the quick learning guild of ktest
especially focuses on some important
ith this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400
.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/version-test
datetime.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400
he diffstat can be found below.
All 3.10.55-rc1, 3.14.19-rc1, and 3.6.3-rc1 passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kerne
, 3.14.19-rc1, and 3.6.3-rc1 passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/r
/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/version-test
datetime.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4
- memory
e.
Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi
Thanks,
Satoru
>
> ---
> tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl | 6 --
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl b/tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl
> index 55ab700..72010f4 100755
> --- a/tools/
...@canonical.com
It look good to me.
Reviewed-by: Satoru Takeuchi satoru.takeu...@gmail.com
Thanks,
Satoru
---
tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl b/tools/testing/ktest/ktest.pl
index 55ab700
stable-rc kernels! It's the largest number I've ever tested at a one
time :-)
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config,
-rc1, 3.10.53-rc1, and 3.4.103-rc1 passed
my test.
# Five stable-rc kernels! It's the largest number I've ever tested at a one
time :-)
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru
er.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
>
> Guenter
This kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .confi
>
> > >greg k-h
> > >
> >
> > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions
> > compared to previous 3.15.8
>
> Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
>
> greg k-h
All 3.15.9-rc1, 3.14.16-rc1, 3.10.52-rc1, and 3.4.102-rc1 p
3.15.9-rc1, 3.14.16-rc1, 3.10.52-rc1, and 3.4.102-rc1 passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config
the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/version-test
datetime.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian
9 pass: 139 fail: 0
>
> Qemu tests all passed.
>
> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
>
> Guenter
This kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test
e latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel
with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/version-test
datetime.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM
://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
Guenter
This kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config
e latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel
with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/version-test
datetime.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM
his kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz
- Build Environ
.
Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
Guenter
Plus, it passed my test too.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux
At Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:50:45 -0700,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:12:28PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 07/16/2014 04:09 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:16:57PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >>This is the start of the stable
At Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:50:45 -0700,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:12:28PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 07/16/2014 04:09 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:16:57PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle
Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
# "selftests" is not added to this list yet.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/
Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/version-test
datetime.tar.xz
- Build Environment:
- OS: Debian Jessy x86_64
- CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU
Hi Himangi,
(2014/07/09 7:21), Himangi Saraogi wrote:
Use BUG_ON(x) rather than if(x) BUG();
The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows:
//
@@ identifier x; @@
-if (x) BUG();
+BUG_ON(x);
//
Strictly speaking, BUG_ON() is "if (unlikely(x)) BUG".
Anyway, I consider that put
t;
> Guenter
>
This kernel passed my test. I didn't hit the problem which
Guenter reported since I only test x86_64 arch.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test
.
Guenter
This kernel passed my test. I didn't hit the problem which
Guenter reported since I only test x86_64 arch.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test
Hi Himangi,
(2014/07/09 7:21), Himangi Saraogi wrote:
Use BUG_ON(x) rather than if(x) BUG();
The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows:
// smpl
@@ identifier x; @@
-if (x) BUG();
+BUG_ON(x);
// /smpl
Strictly speaking, BUG_ON() is if (unlikely(x)) BUG.
Anyway, I consider that
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz
-rc1, 3.10.48-rc1, and 3.4.98-rc1 passed my test.
Build errors in 3.14.11 and 3.10.11-rc1 disappeared.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test
At Sat, 5 Jul 2014 12:10:58 -0700,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 02:56:55PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Sat, 05 Jul 2014 18:21:04 +0900,
> > Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > Add Takashi Iw
Hi Greg,
Add Takashi Iwai to this thread.
At Sat, 05 Jul 2014 16:00:41 +0900,
Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
>
> At Fri, 04 Jul 2014 22:45:42 -0700,
> Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > On 07/04/2014 03:18 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stabl
e[1]: *** [sound] Error 2
...
LD net/built-in.o
Makefile:130: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
FAILED!
CRITICAL FAILURE... failed build
===
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
d this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/-.tar.xz
- Buil
;
> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
This kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Resul
uilders.
>
> On a side note, would be great if you can update the master branch
> of -stable at some point. It is still at -rc2.
This kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Tes
at -rc2.
This kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru
.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log):
http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/version-test
datetime.tar.xz
FAILURE... failed build
...
===
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test
===
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable
- Test Result (kernel .config, ktest
Hi Greg,
Add Takashi Iwai to this thread.
At Sat, 05 Jul 2014 16:00:41 +0900,
Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
At Fri, 04 Jul 2014 22:45:42 -0700,
Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 07/04/2014 03:18 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.11 release
At Sat, 5 Jul 2014 12:10:58 -0700,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 02:56:55PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Sat, 05 Jul 2014 18:21:04 +0900,
Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
Hi Greg,
Add Takashi Iwai to this thread.
At Sat, 05 Jul 2014 16:00:41 +0900,
Satoru
(2014/07/02 9:01), David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:35:43PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
kcalloc manages count*sizeof overflow.
Cc: Chris Mason
Cc: Josef Bacik
Cc: linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
Reviewed-by: David Sterba
Reviewed-by: Satoru
gt; let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed Jul 2 11:49:58 2014
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
This kernel passed my test.
- Test Cases:
- Build this kernel.
- Boot this kernel.
- Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel.
- Test Tool:
h
1 - 100 of 504 matches
Mail list logo
