On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Scott M. Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It may not be related, but out of five boot attempts, only one got past
> >the IDE driver stage(ie, below from 2.4.2 :
> >
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I have not had problems with 2.4.2, just tried 2.4.2-ac12. About the IDE
> > stage it just reboots.
>
> Does ac11 also reboot like that. -ac is currently testing versions of the new
> VIA IDE driver so knowing if the latest update did that would be very
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I have not had problems with 2.4.2, just tried 2.4.2-ac12. About the IDE
> > stage it just reboots.
>
> Does ac11 also reboot like that. -ac is currently testing versions of the new
> VIA IDE driver so knowing if the latest update did that would be very
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, God wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Scott M. Hoffman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > I -- S T R O N G L Y -- suggest that nobody use this kernel with
> > > a BusLogic SCSI controller until this pro
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, God wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Scott M. Hoffman wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
I -- S T R O N G L Y -- suggest that nobody use this kernel with
a BusLogic SCSI controller until this problem is fixed.
Dick Johnson
It may
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
I have not had problems with 2.4.2, just tried 2.4.2-ac12. About the IDE
stage it just reboots.
Does ac11 also reboot like that. -ac is currently testing versions of the new
VIA IDE driver so knowing if the latest update did that would be very
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
I have not had problems with 2.4.2, just tried 2.4.2-ac12. About the IDE
stage it just reboots.
Does ac11 also reboot like that. -ac is currently testing versions of the new
VIA IDE driver so knowing if the latest update did that would be very
useful
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Scott M. Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may not be related, but out of five boot attempts, only one got past
the IDE driver stage(ie, below from 2.4.2 :
VP_IDE: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
VP_IDE
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> Attempts to run linux-2.4.3-pre2 on chaos.analogic.com results
> in **MASSIVE** file-system destruction. I have (had) all SCSI
> disks, using the BusLogic controller.
>
> There is something **MAJOR** going on BAD, BAD, BAD, even disks
> that were
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
Attempts to run linux-2.4.3-pre2 on chaos.analogic.com results
in **MASSIVE** file-system destruction. I have (had) all SCSI
disks, using the BusLogic controller.
There is something **MAJOR** going on BAD, BAD, BAD, even disks
that were not
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Scott M. Hoffman wrote:
> Hello,
>See the attached Oops passed through ksymoops 2.3.7(the i386 rpm from
> kernel.org). Not sure who should see this...
>Is it generally a good idea to reboot the machine after getting one of
> these?
>
I've
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Scott M. Hoffman wrote:
Hello,
See the attached Oops passed through ksymoops 2.3.7(the i386 rpm from
kernel.org). Not sure who should see this...
Is it generally a good idea to reboot the machine after getting one of
these?
I've been trying to see
Hi,
After getting several segfaults running fetchmail, I tried memtest86 for
the first time on my PC (Celeron 500, i810m/b from e-machines). Five out
of five tries from two different floppy disks crashed at 6% into test 1.
I suspected a new PC133 memory stick, but the test failed at the same
Sorry about the last message, somehow got just the plain oops there.
ksymoops 2.3.7 on i686 2.4.2-pre3. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (specified)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.2-pre3/ (default)
-m /usr/src/linux/System.map (default)
Hello,
See the attached Oops passed through ksymoops 2.3.7(the i386 rpm from
kernel.org). Not sure who should see this...
Is it generally a good idea to reboot the machine after getting one of
these?
Feb 14 04:02:02 nic-31-c31-100 kernel: klogd 1.3-3, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
Hello,
See the attached Oops passed through ksymoops 2.3.7(the i386 rpm from
kernel.org). Not sure who should see this...
Is it generally a good idea to reboot the machine after getting one of
these?
Feb 14 04:02:02 nic-31-c31-100 kernel: klogd 1.3-3, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
Sorry about the last message, somehow got just the plain oops there.
ksymoops 2.3.7 on i686 2.4.2-pre3. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (specified)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.2-pre3/ (default)
-m /usr/src/linux/System.map (default)
Hi,
After getting several segfaults running fetchmail, I tried memtest86 for
the first time on my PC (Celeron 500, i810m/b from e-machines). Five out
of five tries from two different floppy disks crashed at 6% into test 1.
I suspected a new PC133 memory stick, but the test failed at the same
Have you tried it with the modutiles 2.4.0 required by kernel 2.4.0?
Dale Christ wrote:
<>
[7.1.] Software:
-- Versions installed: (if some fields are empty or look
-- unusual then possibly you have very old versions)
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.4.0i586 #9 Fri Jan 26 15:07:33 CST 2001
i586
Have you tried it with the modutiles 2.4.0 required by kernel 2.4.0?
Dale Christ wrote:
Snip
[7.1.] Software:
-- Versions installed: (if some fields are empty or look
-- unusual then possibly you have very old versions)
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.4.0i586 #9 Fri Jan 26 15:07:33 CST 2001
i586
20 matches
Mail list logo
