Hi,
below is a list of files explicitly mentioned twice (or more) in the
MAINTAINERS file.
Kind regards
Sebastian
On 21.08.19 14:10, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
On 20.08.19 19:15, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
Hi,
There are some files which have no official
owner, and there are also
Hi Ted,
On 20.08.19 19:15, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 03:56:24PM +0200, Sebastian Duda wrote:
so the status of the files is inherited from the subsystem `INPUT MULTITOUCH
(MT) PROTOCOL`?
Is it the same with the subsystem `NOKIA N900 POWER SUPPLY DRIVERS`
(respect
27XXX POWER SUPPLY DRIVER` where you're mentioned as reviewer.
Is it intended not to mention a status for your subsystems?
What is the current status of your subsystem?
Kind regards
Sebastian Duda
On 20.08.19 15:14, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 20 August 2019 15:05:51 Sebastian Duda wrote:
Hello Pali,
in my master thesis, I'm using the association of subsystems to
maintainers/reviewers and its status given in the MAINTAINERS file.
During the research I noticed that there are se
OCHIP SAMA5D2-COMPATIBLE PIOBU GPIO` where you're mentioned as
maintainer.
Is it intended not to mention a status for your subsystems?
What is the current status of your subsystem?
Kind regards
Sebastian Duda
ystem
`I2C/SMBUS ISMT DRIVER` where you're mentioned as reviewers.
Is it intended not to mention a status for your subsystems?
What is the current status of your subsystem?
Kind regards
Sebastian Duda
PS/2 TOUCHPAD DRIVER` where you're mentioned as reviewer.
Is it intended not to mention a status for your subsystems?
What is the current status of these systems?
Kind regards
Sebastian Duda
snprintf((char *) ?, 0, ...); always returns Zero and doesn't change the data.
Thus the execution of
snprintf(NULL, 0, "[%5lu.00] ", (unsigned long)ts);
has no effect on program.
The substitution with 0 increases the readability of the code.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian D
8 matches
Mail list logo
