I've included the TPT latency timings.
Do these look normal?
These tests occured in X with netscape and gnomeicu.
It should be noted that /dev/tty12 is being used for syslog info for
console.
Shawn.
Destination Count Min Max Average
These results were based on the latest alpha 2.4.1-pre series kernel.
Do they look ok?
Shawn Starr wrote:
I've included the TPT latency timings.
Do these look normal?
These tests occured in X with netscape and gnomeicu.
It should be noted that /dev/tty12 is being used for syslog info
Can this be confirmed?
Shawn Starr wrote:
> Just a while ago, my system just started acting funny. I couldn't use w,
> top, ps, and then some of my X applications started to freeze too.
> I couldn't even kill those hung processes because they'd hang too. So
> When i tried to rest
Can this be confirmed?
Shawn Starr wrote:
Just a while ago, my system just started acting funny. I couldn't use w,
top, ps, and then some of my X applications started to freeze too.
I couldn't even kill those hung processes because they'd hang too. So
When i tried to restart ctrl+alt+del
: hdc: ATAPI 40X CD-ROM CD-R/RW drive,
8192kB Cache, (U)DMA
the standard ATAPI detects this correctly.
Shawn Starr wrote:
> In 2.4.1-pre8, this info appears in dmesg:
>
> SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
> scsi0 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices
> Vendor:
In 2.4.1-pre8, this info appears in dmesg:
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
scsi0 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices
Vendor: YAMAHAModel: CRW2100E Rev: 1.0H
Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
hdc: YAMAHA CRW2100E, ATAPI
Thanks to everyone who replied :)
Sven Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> > What is the best way to apply a patch on top of a patch already applied?
> >
> > For example, with original sources 2.4.0 i applied 2.4.1pre7 but now
> > that pre8 is
What is the best way to apply a patch on top of a patch already applied?
For example, with original sources 2.4.0 i applied 2.4.1pre7 but now
that pre8 is out, how do i apply those new patches without having to
delete the whole linux dir and untar 2.4.0 again just to apply pre8?
thanks,
Shawn
Yes, it appears the PGCC patches *BREAK* GCC (go figure). 2.4.1-pre7 compiled
fine. JUST as pre8 was released *sigh*
oh well, at least now I wont have to worry about any compiler bugs (unless
some are discovered with 2.95.2) ;)
Shawn.
Shawn Starr wrote:
> Fair enough, but something in bug
Yes, it appears the PGCC patches *BREAK* GCC (go figure). 2.4.1-pre7 compiled
fine. JUST as pre8 was released *sigh*
oh well, at least now I wont have to worry about any compiler bugs (unless
some are discovered with 2.95.2) ;)
Shawn.
Shawn Starr wrote:
Fair enough, but something in bugs.h
What is the best way to apply a patch on top of a patch already applied?
For example, with original sources 2.4.0 i applied 2.4.1pre7 but now
that pre8 is out, how do i apply those new patches without having to
delete the whole linux dir and untar 2.4.0 again just to apply pre8?
thanks,
Shawn
Thanks to everyone who replied :)
Sven Koch wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
What is the best way to apply a patch on top of a patch already applied?
For example, with original sources 2.4.0 i applied 2.4.1pre7 but now
that pre8 is out, how do i apply those new patches
In 2.4.1-pre8, this info appears in dmesg:
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
scsi0 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices
Vendor: YAMAHAModel: CRW2100E Rev: 1.0H
Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
hdc: YAMAHA CRW2100E, ATAPI
: hdc: ATAPI 40X CD-ROM CD-R/RW drive,
8192kB Cache, (U)DMA
the standard ATAPI detects this correctly.
Shawn Starr wrote:
In 2.4.1-pre8, this info appears in dmesg:
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
scsi0 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices
Vendor: YAMAHAModel
; if (offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.i387.fxsave) & 15)
> panic("Kernel compiled for PII/PIII+ with FXSR, data not 16-byte
aligned!");
>
90a91,92
Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >>>>> "Shawn" == Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
GCC 2.96/2.97 because they will break my binary compatability with
pgcc-2.95.2/3.
Thanks,
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
GCC 2.96/2.97 because they will break my binary compatability with
pgcc-2.95.2/3.
Thanks,
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
task_struct, thread.i387.fxsave) 15)
panic("Kernel compiled for PII/PIII+ with FXSR, data not 16-byte
aligned!");
90a91,92
Jes Sorensen wrote:
"Shawn" == Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shawn Which compiler will compile the 2.4.1-preX series? Since 2.4.0,
Shawn m
site behind
> such a firewall (some of which are major sites, at the time of this
> writing) you will have to disable this option, either by saying N now
> or by using the sysctl.
>
> Shawn Starr wrote:
> >
> > Here's something strange that i've been noticin
Here's something strange that i've been noticing with 2.4.0. Some websites I am
unable to access now. For example:
http://www.scotiabank.ca/simplify/index.html
if your in Canada and you have Scotia banking online, try and access their
banking sites. It will just hang. However upon trying the
Well, when i Make bzImage it uses -O2 for optimization. Is there any fix? change
the optimization to -O0 ?
Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:02:15PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > Nope, its not ;/
> >
> > Im on a Intel Pentium 200Mhz PC, 64MB RAM,
> >
&
tof(struct task_struct,
thread.i387.fxsave) & 15) {
extern void __buggy_fxsr_alignment(void);
__buggy_fxsr_alignment();
Where is this function? Where is it defined? When i grep the
whole dir i dont see this function anywhere?
Shawn.
Shawn Starr wrote:
e i think it
{
extern void __buggy_fxsr_alignment(void);
__buggy_fxsr_alignment();
Where is this function?Where is it defined?When i grep the
whole dir i dont see this function anywhere?
Shawn.
Shawn Starr wrote:
e i think it was just fixed in pre3 ;-)
+ if (offsetof(struct task_struct,
thread.i387.f
Well, when i Make bzImage it uses -O2 for optimization. Is there any fix? change
the optimization to -O0 ?
Matti Aarnio wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:02:15PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
Nope, its not ;/
Im on a Intel Pentium 200Mhz PC, 64MB RAM,
init/main.o: In function `check_fpu
Here's something strange that i've been noticing with 2.4.0. Some websites I am
unable to access now. For example:
http://www.scotiabank.ca/simplify/index.html
if your in Canada and you have Scotia banking online, try and access their
banking sites. It will just hang. However upon trying the
of this
writing) you will have to disable this option, either by saying N now
or by using the sysctl.
Shawn Starr wrote:
Here's something strange that i've been noticing with 2.4.0. Some websites I am
unable to access now. For example:
http://www.scotiabank.ca/simplify/index.html
e
>
> init/main.o: In function `check_fpu':
> init/main.o(.text.init+0x53): undefined reference to `__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
>
> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
>
> On compiling (and recompiling) i get this fatal error. This function
> does not exist anymore?
>
> Anyone e
ore?
Anyone else having this problem?
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
init/main.o: In function `check_fpu':
init/main.o(.text.init+0x53): undefined reference to
`__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
On compiling (and recompiling) i get this fatal error. This function
does not exist anymore?
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
init/main.o: In function `check_fpu':
init/main.o(.text.init+0x53): undefined reference to
`__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
On compiling (and recompiling) i get this fatal error. This function
does not exist anymore?
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
?
Anyone else having this problem?
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
: In function `check_fpu':
init/main.o(.text.init+0x53): undefined reference to `__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
On compiling (and recompiling) i get this fatal error. This function
does not exist anymore?
Anyone else having this problem?
Shawn Starr
ahh ok, so everythings fine then. It would be nice though to see that
value perhaps in future they'll be a way.
Thanks,
Shawn.
Doug McNaught wrote:
> Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [spstarr@coredump /etc]$ free
> > total used fr
)
the shmfs is mounted. Is there any configuration i need to get shm
memory activiated?
Thanks,
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
)
the shmfs is mounted. Is there any configuration i need to get shm
memory activiated?
Thanks,
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ahh ok, so everythings fine then. It would be nice though to see that
value perhaps in future they'll be a way.
Thanks,
Shawn.
Doug McNaught wrote:
Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[spstarr@coredump /etc]$ free
total used free sharedbuffers
cached
bleh, ignore that. I fixed the problem. dont know what I did though but its
ok now..
Shawn Starr wrote:
Dec 28 09:31:59 coredump kernel: Filesystem panic (dev 03:41).
> Dec 28 09:31:59 coredump kernel: FAT error
> Dec 28 09:31:59 coredump kernel: File system has been set read-only
&g
FAT32 for
the filesystem.
When I rebooted into Win2k the system did not detect a corrupt FAT.
Im going to compile 2.2.19ac3 today and see if this was a known issue or
not.
I dont know what information I can give you other then what the log
shows.
Thanks,
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from
FAT32 for
the filesystem.
When I rebooted into Win2k the system did not detect a corrupt FAT.
Im going to compile 2.2.19ac3 today and see if this was a known issue or
not.
I dont know what information I can give you other then what the log
shows.
Thanks,
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from
bleh, ignore that. I fixed the problem. dont know what I did though but its
ok now..
Shawn Starr wrote:
Dec 28 09:31:59 coredump kernel: Filesystem panic (dev 03:41).
Dec 28 09:31:59 coredump kernel: FAT error
Dec 28 09:31:59 coredump kernel: File system has been set read-only
Dec 28 09
Unfortunately. I hope some of those key developers see this is a time to
"Let's fix our security problems". Ie, GNOME, etc...
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, David Ford wrote:
> gnome, kde, enlightenment...these are just a few of the "let's give everyone
> access" utilities.
>
> -d
>
> "Mohammad A.
Odd, Isn't 777 insecure for shared memory segments?
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, David Ford wrote:
> (cc: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - this
> should be the last post to LKML for this subject)
>
> Known historical items:
>
> -All shm segments get used up in very fast order.
>
Unfortunately. I hope some of those key developers see this is a time to
"Let's fix our security problems". Ie, GNOME, etc...
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, David Ford wrote:
gnome, kde, enlightenment...these are just a few of the "let's give everyone
access" utilities.
-d
"Mohammad A. Haque"
301 - 343 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
