Hi Herbert,
On 04/28/2014 11:59 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 03:48:37PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>>
>> +#define QCE_MAJOR_VERSION5 0x05
>> +#define QCE_QUEUE_LENGTH50
>
> What is the purpose of this software queue? Why can't you directly
> feed the requests to the
Hi Herbert,
On 04/28/2014 11:59 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 03:48:37PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
+#define QCE_MAJOR_VERSION5 0x05
+#define QCE_QUEUE_LENGTH50
What is the purpose of this software queue? Why can't you directly
feed the requests to the hardware?
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the patch!
On 04/17/2014 12:45 AM, Andy Gross wrote:
> This patch adds support for the v1.3.0 version of the BAM dma ip block. This
> patch adds register access abstraction to deal with the changes to the
> register
> map between the two versions. Blocks of registers moved
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the patch!
On 04/17/2014 12:45 AM, Andy Gross wrote:
This patch adds support for the v1.3.0 version of the BAM dma ip block. This
patch adds register access abstraction to deal with the changes to the
register
map between the two versions. Blocks of registers moved
Hi Kumar,
> + intc: interrupt-controller@200 {
> + compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2";
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + reg = < 0x0200 0x1000 >,
> +
Hi Kumar,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-ap148.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-ap148.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..5e6f456
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-ap148.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +#include "qcom-ipq8064-v1.0.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> +
Hi Kumar,
snip
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-ap148.dts
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-ap148.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000..5e6f456
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-ap148.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+#include qcom-ipq8064-v1.0.dtsi
+
+/ {
+
Hi Kumar,
snip
+ intc: interrupt-controller@200 {
+ compatible = qcom,msm-qgic2;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = 3;
+ reg = 0x0200 0x1000 ,
+
Hi Srini,
Thanks for the comments.
On 04/04/2014 12:23 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
> Minor nitpicks.
>
> On 03/04/14 17:17, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> +#define REQ_SIZE17 /* bit 20-17 */
>
> I would have defined macros like this with _SHIFT at the end, something
> like this:
Hi Srini,
Thanks for the comments.
On 04/04/2014 12:23 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
Minor nitpicks.
On 03/04/14 17:17, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
+#define REQ_SIZE17 /* bit 20-17 */
I would have defined macros like this with _SHIFT at the end, something
like this:
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the patch.
> +#define BAM_IRQ_SRCS_EE(pipe)(0x0800 + ((pipe) * 0x80))
> +#define BAM_IRQ_SRCS_MSK_EE(pipe)(0x0804 + ((pipe) * 0x80))
s/pipe/ee ?
> +struct bam_chan {
> + struct virt_dma_chan vc;
> +
> + struct bam_device *bdev;
> +
> + /*
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the patch.
snip
+#define BAM_IRQ_SRCS_EE(pipe)(0x0800 + ((pipe) * 0x80))
+#define BAM_IRQ_SRCS_MSK_EE(pipe)(0x0804 + ((pipe) * 0x80))
s/pipe/ee ?
snip
+struct bam_chan {
+ struct virt_dma_chan vc;
+
+ struct bam_device *bdev;
+
+ /*
12 matches
Mail list logo