Re: [OT] Suitable Athlon Motherboard for Linux

Well, I have an Acer AK73 Pro(A), with an Athlon 1.333 GHz (133 FSB). I have never had anuy lockup or data corruption problems. I do run this system as a dual-boot, usually under Win2K :( The system is as follows: Acer AK73 Pro(A) Athlon (C) 1.333 GHz IBM DTLA307060 60G IDE hard drive

Re: [OT] Suitable Athlon Motherboard for Linux

Well, I have an Acer AK73 Pro(A), with an Athlon 1.333 GHz (133 FSB). I have never had anuy lockup or data corruption problems. I do run this system as a dual-boot, usually under Win2K :( The system is as follows: Acer AK73 Pro(A) Athlon (C) 1.333 GHz IBM DTLA307060 60G IDE hard drive

Re: Exporting new functions from kernel 2.2.14

Well, my rebuild kernel / reboot / recompile module just finished. Unfortunately, the printk warning was still there. I replaced the unconditional #define MODVERSIONS with #include #ifdef CONFIG_MODVERSIONS #define MODVERSIONS #include #endif this is at the top of my source file. (before

Re: Exporting new functions from kernel 2.2.14

um. duh. Thanks. I guess it helps to know the right FM to R. :) Arthur had pointed out that modules.h should be included, then kernel.h. Is there a place where I can find out more about header file order dependencies? (damn - that sounds like a Microsoft help question) Keith Owens wrote: >

Re: Exporting new functions from kernel 2.2.14

Thanks. Actually, the symbols in question aren't in modules. The kernel is module enabled, but all drivers are being compiled in (this is for an embedded system). My external module (which needs to grab the timer interrupt) is in a separate source tree. Thanks for the printk info - I guess

Exporting new functions from kernel 2.2.14

Hello, all. I am writing a pseudo-realtime control system, based on kernel 2.2.14. The only RT-like task needs to hang off the timer IRQ. I am using techniques like those in the book "Linux Kernel Internals", by Beck, et al.. The patches in that book won't apply (they are for 2.1.24 or lower),

Exporting new functions from kernel 2.2.14

Hello, all. I am writing a pseudo-realtime control system, based on kernel 2.2.14. The only RT-like task needs to hang off the timer IRQ. I am using techniques like those in the book Linux Kernel Internals, by Beck, et al.. The patches in that book won't apply (they are for 2.1.24 or lower),

Re: Exporting new functions from kernel 2.2.14

Thanks. Actually, the symbols in question aren't in modules. The kernel is module enabled, but all drivers are being compiled in (this is for an embedded system). My external module (which needs to grab the timer interrupt) is in a separate source tree. Thanks for the printk info - I guess

Re: Exporting new functions from kernel 2.2.14

um. duh. Thanks. I guess it helps to know the right FM to R. :) Arthur had pointed out that modules.h should be included, then kernel.h. Is there a place where I can find out more about header file order dependencies? (damn - that sounds like a Microsoft help question) Keith Owens wrote:

Re: Exporting new functions from kernel 2.2.14

Well, my rebuild kernel / reboot / recompile module just finished. Unfortunately, the printk warning was still there. I replaced the unconditional #define MODVERSIONS with #include linux/config.h #ifdef CONFIG_MODVERSIONS #define MODVERSIONS #include linux/modversions.h #endif this is at the

Re: [OT] Interrupting select

"Peter T. Breuer" wrote: [snip]> um, shouldn't you be testing for res==-1, as well? > > specifically that condition and errno==EINTR is how I'd expect > > signals to effect the loop... [snip] > I assumed that "error" is something like trying to watch for a > negative number or zero

Re: [OT] Interrupting select

Peter T. Breuer wrote: [snip] um, shouldn't you be testing for res==-1, as well? specifically that condition and errno==EINTR is how I'd expect signals to effect the loop... [snip] I assumed that error is something like trying to watch for a negative number or zero descriptors, or

Re: APIC usb MPS 1.4 and the 2.4.2 kernel

CPUs and 1G RAM (EDO - it's 4 years old). They have newer boards with 6 PCI (64 bit, 66 MHz) + 1 AGP slot. Their boards are very high quality - though you'll pay for the reliability in $$$. -- Stephen Wille Padnos Programmer, Engineer, Problem Solver [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from thi

Re: APIC usb MPS 1.4 and the 2.4.2 kernel

4 years old). They have newer boards with 6 PCI (64 bit, 66 MHz) + 1 AGP slot. Their boards are very high quality - though you'll pay for the reliability in $$$. -- Stephen Wille Padnos Programmer, Engineer, Problem Solver [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG_ADD_PAGE

"Richard B. Johnson" wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > > > "Richard B. Johnson" wrote: > > [snip] > > > Another problem with 'volatile' has to do with pointers. When > > > it's possible for some obj

Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG_ADD_PAGE

he pointer volatile (the third case declares a volatile pointer to a structure with volatile parts). So, the programmer should have the choice, if gcc is dealing with volatile correctly. Of course, that doesn't mean that the authors have made the right choice :) -- Stephen Wille Padno

Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG_ADD_PAGE

le pointer to a structure with volatile parts). So, the programmer should have the choice, if gcc is dealing with volatile correctly. Of course, that doesn't mean that the authors have made the right choice :) -- Stephen Wille Padnos Programmer, Engineer, Problem Solver [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubs

Re: [PATCH] micro-opt DEBUG_ADD_PAGE

"Richard B. Johnson" wrote: On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: "Richard B. Johnson" wrote: [snip] Another problem with 'volatile' has to do with pointers. When it's possible for some object to be modified by some external influence, we see:

Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems running 2.4.1

eferred for high end systems - you can "disconnect" from an IO operation to allow other IO's to be sent to other devices on the same bus) -- Stephen Wille Padnos Programmer, Engineer, Problem Solver [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems running 2.4.1

- you can "disconnect" from an IO operation to allow other IO's to be sent to other devices on the same bus) -- Stephen Wille Padnos Programmer, Engineer, Problem Solver [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

Re: VIA VT82C686X

Byron Stanoszek wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote: > > > I removed the ide and ata setting. System is running stably as in no > > kernel crashes, but I am getting daemon and shell crashes. With this > > current kernel I've had 1 kernel crash in about 3 hours as compared to 1

Re: VIA VT82C686X

Byron Stanoszek wrote: On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote: I removed the ide and ata setting. System is running stably as in no kernel crashes, but I am getting daemon and shell crashes. With this current kernel I've had 1 kernel crash in about 3 hours as compared to 1 every