On 28 Jun 2001, Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
> SuSE 7.1, wireless-tools-20-5, kernel 2.4.5-pre3:
>
> /root# gdb iwconfig
> [...]
> (gdb) run wvlan0
[...]
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0xc22ab05c in ?? ()
>
> Can't get any further useful info from gdb.
>
>
On 28 Jun 2001, Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
SuSE 7.1, wireless-tools-20-5, kernel 2.4.5-pre3:
/root# gdb iwconfig
[...]
(gdb) run wvlan0
[...]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xc22ab05c in ?? ()
Can't get any further useful info from gdb.
Is
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Tomas Telensky wrote:
> does anybody know about any archive/digest service for this mailing
> list? Majordomo at vger doesn't support this. Or does anybody of you
> archive all e-mails?
>
> I'm especially interested in the _WHOLE_ thread "No 100Hz timer !" now.
> (but the
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Tomas Telensky wrote:
does anybody know about any archive/digest service for this mailing
list? Majordomo at vger doesn't support this. Or does anybody of you
archive all e-mails?
I'm especially interested in the _WHOLE_ thread No 100Hz timer ! now.
(but the question
hi...
Machine: DEC Alpha XL300 (Alcor/XLT)
boots from scsi, and ide is used modular
IDE-Controller: Promise ATA100 controller (PCI card)
bios knows absolutely nothing about IDE
(there aren't even options to set drive geometry etc)
Deadlocks on loading
hi...
Machine: DEC Alpha XL300 (Alcor/XLT)
boots from scsi, and ide is used modular
IDE-Controller: Promise ATA100 controller (PCI card)
bios knows absolutely nothing about IDE
(there aren't even options to set drive geometry etc)
Deadlocks on loading
hi...
Machine: DEC-Alpha XL300 (Alcor/XLT)
Kernel: 2.4.2-ac3
Compile-Error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.2-ac3/arch/alpha/kernel'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.2-ac3/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-mno-fp-regs
hi...
Machine: DEC-Alpha XL300 (Alcor/XLT)
Kernel: 2.4.2-ac3
Compile-Error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.2-ac3/arch/alpha/kernel'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.2-ac3/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-mno-fp-regs
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote:
[cc-list trimmed]
> That said, and while we're on the topic.. Does anyone have a
> *PERFECT* recipe for procmail to REMOVE the stupid [Dummy] things
> most GNU mailman lists and others prepend to the subject?
I am using the following to sort the
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote:
[cc-list trimmed]
That said, and while we're on the topic.. Does anyone have a
*PERFECT* recipe for procmail to REMOVE the stupid [Dummy] things
most GNU mailman lists and others prepend to the subject?
I am using the following to sort the
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> give 2.4.0-test12 a final whirl before I release it as 2.4.1? We got a lot
[...]
> The other changes in pre12 aren't likely to be all that noticeable, unless
[...]
> Linus
Seems that even you are still confused with -testXX and -preXX
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
give 2.4.0-test12 a final whirl before I release it as 2.4.1? We got a lot
[...]
The other changes in pre12 aren't likely to be all that noticeable, unless
[...]
Linus
Seems that even you are still confused with -testXX and -preXX ;)
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
> What is the best way to apply a patch on top of a patch already applied?
>
> For example, with original sources 2.4.0 i applied 2.4.1pre7 but now
> that pre8 is out, how do i apply those new patches without having to
> delete the whole linux dir and
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
What is the best way to apply a patch on top of a patch already applied?
For example, with original sources 2.4.0 i applied 2.4.1pre7 but now
that pre8 is out, how do i apply those new patches without having to
delete the whole linux dir and untar
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, rtviado wrote:
> I got this in my logs:
>
> ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 16368 entries exceeded
>
> what does this mean, I know i can change the limits in
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max, but I want to know what this is for.
This means that iptable is tracking more
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, rtviado wrote:
I got this in my logs:
ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 16368 entries exceeded
what does this mean, I know i can change the limits in
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max, but I want to know what this is for.
This means that iptable is tracking more than
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> > You have a hard destroke clipping on the drive.
> > Go look at you logs.
>
> Yep, logs indicate that..
>
> Sven, how did you kill the clipping ??
> Or in generic, how do I kill the clipping ?
I did'nt know something like that even existed :)
Just
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> kernel 2.2.18 hates my Maxtor drive :
>
> ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> hda: Maxtor 96147H6, 32253MB w/2048kB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63, (U)DMA
>
> Actual (correct) parameters : CHS=119112/16/63
>
> Looks like some short int (2 bytes)
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
kernel 2.2.18 hates my Maxtor drive :
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
hda: Maxtor 96147H6, 32253MB w/2048kB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63, (U)DMA
Actual (correct) parameters : CHS=119112/16/63
Looks like some short int (2 bytes) overflowing. I'll
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
You have a hard destroke clipping on the drive.
Go look at you logs.
Yep, logs indicate that..
Sven, how did you kill the clipping ??
Or in generic, how do I kill the clipping ?
I did'nt know something like that even existed :)
Just plugged
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> A level IV issue in 2.2.18-23. With frame buffer enabled, upon boot,
> the OS is displaying four penguin images instead of one penguin in the
> upper left corner of the screen. Looks rather tacky. Also puts the VGA
> text mode default into mode
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
A level IV issue in 2.2.18-23. With frame buffer enabled, upon boot,
the OS is displaying four penguin images instead of one penguin in the
upper left corner of the screen. Looks rather tacky. Also puts the VGA
text mode default into mode 274.
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, David Lang wrote:
> depending on what CPU you have the kernel (and compiler) can use different
> commands/opmizations/etc, if you want to do this on boot you have two
> options.
Wouldn't it be possible to compile the parts of the kernel needed to
uncompress and to detect the
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, David Lang wrote:
depending on what CPU you have the kernel (and compiler) can use different
commands/opmizations/etc, if you want to do this on boot you have two
options.
Wouldn't it be possible to compile the parts of the kernel needed to
uncompress and to detect the
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Well, having .in and .mak files with single lines in them seems ugly
> to me. What about make dep scanning for
>
> /* Makefile: obj-$(CONFIG_MY_DRIVER) += mydriver.o */
> /* Config.in: bool CONFIG_MY_DRIVER */
>
> in .c files?
Isn't
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:
Well, having .in and .mak files with single lines in them seems ugly
to me. What about make dep scanning for
/* Makefile: obj-$(CONFIG_MY_DRIVER) += mydriver.o */
/* Config.in: bool CONFIG_MY_DRIVER */
in .c files?
Isn't "make
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> Oh God , I hope this doesn't mean what I think it might ?
> Please tell me I am stil going to be able to 'Statically' compile
> in the drivers of my choosing ? Tia , JimL
This discussion is about using one initialization
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
Oh God , I hope this doesn't mean what I think it might ?
Please tell me I am stil going to be able to 'Statically' compile
in the drivers of my choosing ? Tia , JimL
This discussion is about using one initialization
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Jorge Nerin wrote:
> This is a little offtopic, but as everybody here uses patches everyday,,
> someone migth have an answer for this.
>
> How can I make a incremental patch of two other patches without making
> two trees?
have a look at interdiff
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Jorge Nerin wrote:
This is a little offtopic, but as everybody here uses patches everyday,,
someone migth have an answer for this.
How can I make a incremental patch of two other patches without making
two trees?
have a look at interdiff
30 matches
Mail list logo
