On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:15:15AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> IBM is triggering this with the host01 test from the LTP suite. I haven't
>> yet
>> tried to reproduce it.
>
> Could you repost their report? So far I hadn't managed to get
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 11:42:52AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> - "bool foo = flag & FLAG" looks suspicious. Is this guaranteed not to
>> overflow?
>
> What do you mean, overflow? It's not a 1-bit unsigned int; conversion to
> _Bool is
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 11:42:52AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
- bool foo = flag FLAG looks suspicious. Is this guaranteed not to
overflow?
What do you mean, overflow? It's not a 1-bit unsigned int; conversion to
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:15:15AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
IBM is triggering this with the host01 test from the LTP suite. I haven't
yet
tried to reproduce it.
Could you repost their report? So far I hadn't
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:41 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> It appears Miklos Szeredi beat me to it with patch 1 (adding renameat2
> syscall to asm-generic unistd.h), and will be submitting it to Linus
> at some point as part of his renameat2 series.
> Miklos: Do you think it makes sense for you to
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:41 PM, James Hogan james.ho...@imgtec.com wrote:
It appears Miklos Szeredi beat me to it with patch 1 (adding renameat2
syscall to asm-generic unistd.h), and will be submitting it to Linus
at some point as part of his renameat2 series.
Miklos: Do you think it makes
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Zach Brown wrote:
>
> When I first started on this stuff I followed the lead of previous
> work and added a new syscall for the copy operation:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/14/618
>
> Towards the end of that thread Eric Wong asked why we didn't just
> extend
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Zach Brown z...@redhat.com wrote:
When I first started on this stuff I followed the lead of previous
work and added a new syscall for the copy operation:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/14/618
Towards the end of that thread Eric Wong asked why we didn't just
8 matches
Mail list logo
