Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the libata tree

2013-08-18 Thread Terry Suereth
Per my original patch, "0x3x26" in code should be "0x3726" (as in the unpatched version). I refer to "x26" in comments as a forward-looking assumption, but AFAIK only 3726 and 3826 exist at this time. terry.suer...@gmail.com On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Tejun,

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the libata tree

2013-08-18 Thread Terry Suereth
Per my original patch, 0x3x26 in code should be 0x3726 (as in the unpatched version). I refer to x26 in comments as a forward-looking assumption, but AFAIK only 3726 and 3826 exist at this time. terry.suer...@gmail.com On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au