Re: PROBLEM: Build fails in 3.4.6

2012-07-22 Thread Thomas Backlund
22.07.2012 18:02, Alexandre Ferrando skrev: > Summary: Linux kernel 3.4.6 fails to build in some cases when > CONFIG_NO_HZ is set > > Full description: Kernel build using configurations [ 0 ] (mine, > trying to build the zen kernel) and [ 1 ] (from someone using > slackware) fail to build with

Re: PROBLEM: Build fails in 3.4.6

2012-07-22 Thread Thomas Backlund
22.07.2012 18:02, Alexandre Ferrando skrev: Summary: Linux kernel 3.4.6 fails to build in some cases when CONFIG_NO_HZ is set Full description: Kernel build using configurations [ 0 ] (mine, trying to build the zen kernel) and [ 1 ] (from someone using slackware) fail to build with this

Re: [git pull] scheduler updates for v2.6.24

2007-10-16 Thread Thomas Backlund
Ingo Molnar skrev: * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How does this one compare to the v22 you released earlier ? v22 has most of it included. OK, that's what I thought I'm thinking of backporting any fixes/optimizatio

Re: [git pull] scheduler updates for v2.6.24

2007-10-16 Thread Thomas Backlund
Ingo Molnar skrev: Linus, please pull the latest scheduler git tree from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git It contains lots of scheduler updates from lots of people - hopefully the last big one for quite some time. Most of the focus was on

Re: [git pull] scheduler updates for v2.6.24

2007-10-16 Thread Thomas Backlund
Ingo Molnar skrev: Linus, please pull the latest scheduler git tree from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git It contains lots of scheduler updates from lots of people - hopefully the last big one for quite some time. Most of the focus was on

Re: [git pull] scheduler updates for v2.6.24

2007-10-16 Thread Thomas Backlund
Ingo Molnar skrev: * Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Thomas Backlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How does this one compare to the v22 you released earlier ? v22 has most of it included. OK, that's what I thought I'm thinking of backporting any fixes/optimizations to 2.6.22

Re: [patch 00/28] 2.6.22-stable review cycle again

2007-08-29 Thread Thomas Backlund
Greg KH skrev: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.22.6 release. There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and

Re: [patch 00/28] 2.6.22-stable review cycle again

2007-08-29 Thread Thomas Backlund
Greg KH skrev: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.22.6 release. There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and

Re: Problem with SiS Ide/Pata/Sata on 2.6.22-rc7-git4

2007-07-10 Thread Thomas Backlund
Alan Cox skrev: If you modprobe only sis5513 OR If you modprobe only sis5513 and then sata_sis/pata_sis: - you get this: (the hdb drive does not get detected/usable) Don't mix old and new IDE like that. We allow both so you can use old SIS and new Jmicron etc for example but there are

Re: Problem with SiS Ide/Pata/Sata on 2.6.22-rc7-git4

2007-07-10 Thread Thomas Backlund
Alan Cox skrev: If you modprobe only sis5513 OR If you modprobe only sis5513 and then sata_sis/pata_sis: - you get this: (the hdb drive does not get detected/usable) Don't mix old and new IDE like that. We allow both so you can use old SIS and new Jmicron etc for example but there are

Re: Problem with SiS Ide/Pata/Sata on 2.6.22-rc7-git4

2007-07-09 Thread Thomas Backlund
Alan Cox skrev: If you modprobe only sis5513 OR If you modprobe only sis5513 and then sata_sis/pata_sis: - you get this: (the hdb drive does not get detected/usable) Don't mix old and new IDE like that. We allow both so you can use old SIS and new Jmicron etc for example but there are

Problem with SiS Ide/Pata/Sata on 2.6.22-rc7-git4

2007-07-09 Thread Thomas Backlund
Hi, (Please CC me in any responses) There are some weirdness going on with SiS IDE/Pata/Sata support... After moving from a 2.6.17 based kernel with ide dupport built in to a 2.6.22-rc7-git4 based kernel with fully modular ide/pata/sata we see the following problem on a system with ide disks:

Problem with SiS Ide/Pata/Sata on 2.6.22-rc7-git4

2007-07-09 Thread Thomas Backlund
Hi, (Please CC me in any responses) There are some weirdness going on with SiS IDE/Pata/Sata support... After moving from a 2.6.17 based kernel with ide dupport built in to a 2.6.22-rc7-git4 based kernel with fully modular ide/pata/sata we see the following problem on a system with ide disks:

Re: Problem with SiS Ide/Pata/Sata on 2.6.22-rc7-git4

2007-07-09 Thread Thomas Backlund
Alan Cox skrev: If you modprobe only sis5513 OR If you modprobe only sis5513 and then sata_sis/pata_sis: - you get this: (the hdb drive does not get detected/usable) Don't mix old and new IDE like that. We allow both so you can use old SIS and new Jmicron etc for example but there are

Re: speed trends in pata world.

2007-07-04 Thread Thomas Backlund
Gene Heskett skrev: Greetings; The drive speeds seem to be going the wrong way. Its an nforce2 equipt mobo, and I have 3 drives currently in this box. Running 2.6.22-rc6-cfs-v18 + the ftdi_sio.c patch. hda, the primary on cable 0, is running at around 28MB/Sec. Its a 200GB WD about 2

Re: speed trends in pata world.

2007-07-04 Thread Thomas Backlund
Gene Heskett skrev: Greetings; The drive speeds seem to be going the wrong way. Its an nforce2 equipt mobo, and I have 3 drives currently in this box. Running 2.6.22-rc6-cfs-v18 + the ftdi_sio.c patch. hda, the primary on cable 0, is running at around 28MB/Sec. Its a 200GB WD about 2

Re: [PATCH, try3] Add support for picopower irq router

2007-05-01 Thread Thomas Backlund
Randy Dunlap skrev: Thomas Backlund wrote: Sorry, I don't see any changes. Did you send the wrong patch file? Yep :-( Here is the correct one: This patch adds support for PicoPower PT86C523 IRQ router to be used with the in-kernel yenta driver for CardBus. With this patch cardbus

[PATCH, try2] Add support for picopower irq router

2007-05-01 Thread Thomas Backlund
Ported to 2.6.20 by Chmouel Boudjnah (http://www.chmouel.com) Tested and confirmed that it works by Austin Acton. Cleaned up a little for inclusion in a 2.6.21-rc7 & 2.6.21.1 based kernel. Signed-Off-By: Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> arch/i386/pci/irq.c

[patch] Add support for picopower irq router

2007-05-01 Thread Thomas Backlund
to 2.6.20 by Chmouel Boudjnah (http://www.chmouel.com) Tested and confirmed that it works by Austin Acton. Cleaned up a little for inclusion in a 2.6.21-rc7 & 2.6.21.1 based kernel. Signed-Off-By: Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> arch/i386/pci/irq.c

[patch] Add support for picopower irq router

2007-05-01 Thread Thomas Backlund
to 2.6.20 by Chmouel Boudjnah (http://www.chmouel.com) Tested and confirmed that it works by Austin Acton. Cleaned up a little for inclusion in a 2.6.21-rc7 2.6.21.1 based kernel. Signed-Off-By: Thomas Backlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] arch/i386/pci/irq.c | 38

[PATCH, try2] Add support for picopower irq router

2007-05-01 Thread Thomas Backlund
Ported to 2.6.20 by Chmouel Boudjnah (http://www.chmouel.com) Tested and confirmed that it works by Austin Acton. Cleaned up a little for inclusion in a 2.6.21-rc7 2.6.21.1 based kernel. Signed-Off-By: Thomas Backlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] arch/i386/pci/irq.c | 38

Re: [PATCH, try3] Add support for picopower irq router

2007-05-01 Thread Thomas Backlund
Randy Dunlap skrev: Thomas Backlund wrote: Sorry, I don't see any changes. Did you send the wrong patch file? Yep :-( Here is the correct one: This patch adds support for PicoPower PT86C523 IRQ router to be used with the in-kernel yenta driver for CardBus. With this patch cardbus

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Staircase Deadline cpu scheduler version 0.46

2007-04-22 Thread Thomas Backlund
his function) kernel/sched.c:3319: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once kernel/sched.c:3319: error: for each function it appears in.) -- Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Staircase Deadline cpu scheduler version 0.46

2007-04-22 Thread Thomas Backlund
kernel/sched.c:3319: error: for each function it appears in.) -- Thomas Backlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read

Why is arch/s390/crypto/Kconfig sourced when building for another arch ?

2007-03-28 Thread Thomas Backlund
Hi, Why is arch/s390/crypto/Kconfig sourced when building for another arch ? I'm trying to package a stripped down version of the kernelsource with only arch-specific code (/arch/$arch & /include/asm-$arch), the rest of /include, the whole KBuild setup & contents of /scripts to build

Why is arch/s390/crypto/Kconfig sourced when building for another arch ?

2007-03-28 Thread Thomas Backlund
Hi, Why is arch/s390/crypto/Kconfig sourced when building for another arch ? I'm trying to package a stripped down version of the kernelsource with only arch-specific code (/arch/$arch /include/asm-$arch), the rest of /include, the whole KBuild setup contents of /scripts to build 3rdparty

Re: [patch 24/32] add bottom_half.h

2006-12-09 Thread Thomas Backlund
Chris Wright wrote: -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> With CONFIG_SMP=n: drivers/input/ff-memless.c:384: warning: implicit declaration of function 'local_bh_disable'

Re: [patch 24/32] add bottom_half.h

2006-12-09 Thread Thomas Backlund
Chris Wright wrote: -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] With CONFIG_SMP=n: drivers/input/ff-memless.c:384: warning: implicit declaration of function 'local_bh_disable'

Re: WARNING : kernel 2.6.11.7 (others) kills megaraid 4e/Si dead

2005-07-06 Thread Thomas Backlund
Jussi Hamalainen wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Chris Wright wrote: Any news on this matter? I hvr a PE1850 waiting for kernel upgrade, but I'm afraid to do so now... I can't break my box with tests since it's in active use... For now I'm running a 2.6.8.1 based kernel on the box... Last

Re: WARNING : kernel 2.6.11.7 (others) kills megaraid 4e/Si dead

2005-07-06 Thread Thomas Backlund
Jussi Hamalainen wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Chris Wright wrote: Any news on this matter? I hvr a PE1850 waiting for kernel upgrade, but I'm afraid to do so now... I can't break my box with tests since it's in active use... For now I'm running a 2.6.8.1 based kernel on the box... Last

<    1   2