Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-meson8b: ignore the second clock input

2020-12-21 Thread Thomas Graichen
andle > this situation this change can be reverted again. > > Fixes: 566e8251625304 ("net: stmmac: add a glue driver for the Amlogic Meson > 8b / GXBB DWMAC") > Reported-by: Thomas Graichen > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl Tested-by: thomas graichen > --- >

Re: [PATCH RESEND v1] ARM: dts: meson8: remove two invalid interrupt lines from the GPU node

2020-08-23 Thread Thomas Graichen
; interrupt lines. This is also important > because there is no matching entry in interrupt-names for it (meaning > the "pp2" interrupt is actually assigned to the "pp3" interrupt line). > > Fixes: 7d3f6b536e72c9 ("ARM: dts: meson8: add the Mali-450 MP6 GPU") &

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: host: meson-mx-sdhc: fix manual RX FIFO flushing

2020-05-24 Thread Thomas Graichen
where Meson8 and Meson8b SoCs would read random garbage from SD > cards. It is not clear why it worked for eMMC cards. This manifested in > the following errors when plugging in an SD card: > unrecognised SCR structure version > > Fixes: 53ded1b676d199 ("mmc: host: meson-mx-sdhc: n

Re: kapmd cpu usage

2000-10-14 Thread Thomas Graichen
Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Rik, > Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> I have the idea we should really fix this dirty accounting >> thing and properly account kapmd time to idle time. > I got thinking about this and think I went slightly insane :-) > How does t

Re: NFS problems - 2.2.16 (RedHat)

2000-09-28 Thread Thomas Graichen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So, is this a known issue with 2.2.16 NFS? Does the NFS backport in 2.2.18 do > anything to resolve these problems? Is there a dedicated NFS mailing list that I > haven't found yet? yes there is one: [EMAIL PROTECTED] t - [EMAIL PROTECTED] technical director

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Darkstar Development Project

2000-09-16 Thread Thomas Graichen
Larry McVoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 09:55:01PM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote: >> > Err, "faster"? The following is the moral equiv of 4 kernel updates >> > which had nothing to do using BitKeeper instead of CVS. The local copy >> > was in San Francisco and the remote cop

Re: who maintains linux 4 the powerpc

2000-09-08 Thread Thomas Graichen
Cort Dougan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > } Can somebody please tell me, who is currently maintaining > } arch/ppc? > } > } The link > } > } http://www.ppc.kernel.org/ > } > } in the MAINTAINERS file is dead. > } > } Regards, Till > It's unmaintained right now. The www.ppc.kernel.org site is