Re: [PATCH] via-rhine.c, wol-bugfix, Kernel 2.6.11.5

2005-03-24 Thread Thomas Skora
Roger Luethi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This patch won't apply to the 2.6.11.5 I have here -- the driver is > clearing ~0xFC already. The description makes me suspect that the patch > is meant to go the other way, and that would be wrong. You are right. I don't know what happened, but in my

Re: [PATCH] via-rhine.c, wol-bugfix, Kernel 2.6.11.5

2005-03-24 Thread Thomas Skora
Roger Luethi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch won't apply to the 2.6.11.5 I have here -- the driver is clearing ~0xFC already. The description makes me suspect that the patch is meant to go the other way, and that would be wrong. You are right. I don't know what happened, but in my

[PATCH] via-rhine.c, wol-bugfix, Kernel 2.6.11.5

2005-03-23 Thread Thomas Skora
Hello! The via-rhine driver in the actual kernel release 2.6.11.5 resets wake-on-lan-settings of the chip. This leads to the fact, that wol is disabled after the first reboot. I've attached a little patch, that fixes the problem. Thomas Skora patch-via-wol Description: Binary data

[PATCH] via-rhine.c, wol-bugfix, Kernel 2.6.11.5

2005-03-23 Thread Thomas Skora
Hello! The via-rhine driver in the actual kernel release 2.6.11.5 resets wake-on-lan-settings of the chip. This leads to the fact, that wol is disabled after the first reboot. I've attached a little patch, that fixes the problem. Thomas Skora patch-via-wol Description: Binary data