RE: [PATCH net-next] bridge: multicast to unicast

> -Message d'origine- > De : linux-wireless-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-wireless- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] De la part de Stephen Hemminger > Envoyé : samedi 7 janvier 2017 04:14 > À : Linus Lüssing > Cc : net...@vger.kernel.org; David S . Miller; bridge@lists.linux- >

RE: [PATCH net-next] bridge: multicast to unicast

> -Message d'origine- > De : linux-wireless-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-wireless- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] De la part de Stephen Hemminger > Envoyé : samedi 7 janvier 2017 04:14 > À : Linus Lüssing > Cc : net...@vger.kernel.org; David S . Miller; bridge@lists.linux- >

RE: should RTS init in serial core be tied to CRTSCTS

Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > "Tosoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > As far as I know in the old times this was the *standard* > way to use a modem > > (per CCITT V24), and even nowadays many modems can handle > this method for > > transmit, to sta

RE: should RTS init in serial core be tied to CRTSCTS

Krzysztof Halasa wrote: Tosoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As far as I know in the old times this was the *standard* way to use a modem (per CCITT V24), and even nowadays many modems can handle this method for transmit, to stay compatible with the standard. I think it wasn't standard

RE: should RTS init in serial core be tied to CRTSCTS

Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > OTOH I wonder what does the device in question require WRT the > serial port and WRT RTS line in particular. > I know there are some half-duplex converters which drive RTS only > while sending and which require CTS to send. As far as I know in the old times this was the

RE: should RTS init in serial core be tied to CRTSCTS

Krzysztof Halasa wrote: OTOH I wonder what does the device in question require WRT the serial port and WRT RTS line in particular. I know there are some half-duplex converters which drive RTS only while sending and which require CTS to send. As far as I know in the old times this was the