Roland Dreier wrote:
Thanks, applied.
Jack, I thought you guys tested the build on powerpc. How did this
sneak through?
We OFED on PPC - not clear how this happened
We will check our process again
Tziporet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
Roland Dreier wrote:
Thanks, applied.
Jack, I thought you guys tested the build on powerpc. How did this
sneak through?
We OFED on PPC - not clear how this happened
We will check our process again
Tziporet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
Roland Dreier wrote:
Linus, please pull from
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git for-linus
This tree is also available from kernel.org mirrors at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git
for-linus
This will get a second batch
Roland Dreier wrote:
Linus, please pull from
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git for-linus
This tree is also available from kernel.org mirrors at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git
for-linus
This will get a second batch
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Has anyone tested these with QoS actually be used ? I suppose this
requires Connect-X.
You can test it with a switch without ConnectX.
If you want that the HCA will react to the QoS setting too then you
should have ConnectX
Tziporet
-
To unsubscribe from this
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Has anyone tested these with QoS actually be used ? I suppose this
requires Connect-X.
You can test it with a switch without ConnectX.
If you want that the HCA will react to the QoS setting too then you
should have ConnectX
Tziporet
-
To unsubscribe from this
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
As far as I know Intel run with SA cache enabled on large clusters with
Intel MPI
With OFED 1.2 version of the code, right?
Yes.
But maybe they also used the new module - Sean?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
We have the patches applied in ofed 1.2.c with default module parameter set to
caching disabled (ofed 1.2 had a different version of the patches, but caching
is disabled by default there, too). At least in this configuration
(caching disabled), all issues I've seen seem
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
We have the patches applied in ofed 1.2.c with default module parameter set to
caching disabled (ofed 1.2 had a different version of the patches, but caching
is disabled by default there, too). At least in this configuration
(caching disabled), all issues I've seen seem
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
As far as I know Intel run with SA cache enabled on large clusters with
Intel MPI
With OFED 1.2 version of the code, right?
Yes.
But maybe they also used the new module - Sean?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
Roland Dreier wrote:
As you can see, I just sent my first 2.6.23 pull request for Linus.
There are still a few more things I plan to do in before the merge
window closes (in ~10 days):
Till when can we insert mlx4 with FMRs?
Tziporet
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Roland Dreier wrote:
As you can see, I just sent my first 2.6.23 pull request for Linus.
There are still a few more things I plan to do in before the merge
window closes (in ~10 days):
Till when can we insert mlx4 with FMRs?
Tziporet
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
12 matches
Mail list logo
