Hi,
On 2012.10.10. 22:27, Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 10-10-12 22:44:41, Viktor Nagy wrote:
On 10/10/2012 06:57 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello,
On Tue 09-10-12 11:41:16, Viktor Nagy wrote:
Since Kernel version 3.0 pdflush blocks writes even the dirty bytes
are well below /proc/sys/vm/dirty_bytes
Hi,
On 2012.10.10. 22:27, Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 10-10-12 22:44:41, Viktor Nagy wrote:
On 10/10/2012 06:57 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello,
On Tue 09-10-12 11:41:16, Viktor Nagy wrote:
Since Kernel version 3.0 pdflush blocks writes even the dirty bytes
are well below /proc/sys/vm/dirty_bytes
Hi,
On 10/10/2012 06:57 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello,
On Tue 09-10-12 11:41:16, Viktor Nagy wrote:
Since Kernel version 3.0 pdflush blocks writes even the dirty bytes
are well below /proc/sys/vm/dirty_bytes or /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio.
The kernel 2.6.39 works nice.
How this hurt us
Hi,
On 10/10/2012 06:57 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello,
On Tue 09-10-12 11:41:16, Viktor Nagy wrote:
Since Kernel version 3.0 pdflush blocks writes even the dirty bytes
are well below /proc/sys/vm/dirty_bytes or /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio.
The kernel 2.6.39 works nice.
How this hurt us
cache, and 5.1 GByte RAM free (totally unused).
Sorry if I not found the right place to report this, please advise me
were to send.
Best regards
Viktor Nagy
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
// parameters
char * filename = N
free (totally unused).
Sorry if I not found the right place to report this, please advise me
were to send.
Best regards
Viktor Nagy
#include stdio.h
#include string.h
#include getopt.h
#include inttypes.h
#include sys/time.h
#include time.h
#include stdlib.h
#include unistd.h
#include sys
6 matches
Mail list logo
