Le vendredi 14 décembre 2007 à 09:28 -0800, Greg KH a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:37:39PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 08:26:42AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:21:26PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Kay Sievers <[EMAIL
Le vendredi 14 décembre 2007 à 09:28 -0800, Greg KH a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:37:39PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 08:26:42AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:21:26PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Kay Sievers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 08:59 -0500, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 13:55 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Dhaval Giani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Could you please see if the following patch removes the oops due
> to
> > > CFS sysfs files? (There might still be the other oops
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 08:12 -0500, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dhaval Giani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > static void user_attr_init(struct subsys_attribute *sa, char
> *name, int mode)
> > > > {
> > > > + sa->attr.owner = NULL;
> > > > sa->attr.name = name;
> > >
> > > i'm wondering why
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 18:32 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 01:55:09PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Dhaval Giani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Could you please see if the following patch removes the oops due to
> > > CFS sysfs files? (There might still be the
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 18:32 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 01:55:09PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Dhaval Giani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please see if the following patch removes the oops due to
CFS sysfs files? (There might still be the other oops due
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 08:12 -0500, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Dhaval Giani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
static void user_attr_init(struct subsys_attribute *sa, char
*name, int mode)
{
+ sa-attr.owner = NULL;
sa-attr.name = name;
i'm wondering why doesnt this affect 2.6.23 and
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 08:59 -0500, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 13:55 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Dhaval Giani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please see if the following patch removes the oops due
to
CFS sysfs files? (There might still be the other oops due to the
Le vendredi 30 novembre 2007 à 12:35 -0500, Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] a
écrit :
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : Randy Dunlap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Envoyé : 30 novembre 2007 12:13
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:02:54 + Vincent Fo
Le vendredi 30 novembre 2007 à 12:35 -0500, Fortier,Vincent [Montreal] a
écrit :
-Message d'origine-
De : Randy Dunlap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 30 novembre 2007 12:13
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:02:54 + Vincent Fortier wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using a 2.6.22.14
Hi all,
I'm using a 2.6.22.14 + CFS v24 and I got theses errors when starting up
my commvault galaxy client... Do anybody know what this could mean?
Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Fri Nov 30 12:54:57 2007 ...
printemps kernel: [750078.538268] Oops: [#1]
printemps kernel: [750078.538284]
Hi all,
I'm using a 2.6.22.14 + CFS v24 and I got theses errors when starting up
my commvault galaxy client... Do anybody know what this could mean?
Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Fri Nov 30 12:54:57 2007 ...
printemps kernel: [750078.538268] Oops: [#1]
printemps kernel: [750078.538284]
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 16:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> By popular demand, here is release -v24 of the CFS scheduler patch.
>
> It is a full backport of the latest & greatest scheduler code to
> v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7. The patches can be
> downloaded from the usual place:
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 16:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
By popular demand, here is release -v24 of the CFS scheduler patch.
It is a full backport of the latest greatest scheduler code to
v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7. The patches can be
downloaded from the usual place:
14 matches
Mail list logo
