2.4.1 lvm reiserfs adaptec 2940uw noritake alpha

2001-02-01 Thread Wakko Warner
I have 3 2gb disks in an lvm group (vg is disks) I have an lv of 1.6gb (misc) with reiserfs mounted /lvm/misc I cp /dev/zero /lvm/misc If these 3 drives are on the internal qlogic isp controller, I have no problems. If these 3 drives are on the adaptec aha-2940UW, I get an oops (reply for oops

es1371 2.4.1 on noritake alpha

2001-02-01 Thread Wakko Warner
This is just a sample of what I get: es1371: sample rate converter timeout r = 0xeb970800 es1371: sample rate converter timeout r = 0x0087 es1371: sample rate converter timeout r = 0x0097 es1371: sample rate converter timeout r = 0xea80 This card is on the secondary PCI bus. System:

es1371 2.4.1 on noritake alpha

2001-02-01 Thread Wakko Warner
This is just a sample of what I get: es1371: sample rate converter timeout r = 0xeb970800 es1371: sample rate converter timeout r = 0x0087 es1371: sample rate converter timeout r = 0x0097 es1371: sample rate converter timeout r = 0xea80 This card is on the secondary PCI bus. System:

2.4.1 lvm reiserfs adaptec 2940uw noritake alpha

2001-02-01 Thread Wakko Warner
I have 3 2gb disks in an lvm group (vg is disks) I have an lv of 1.6gb (misc) with reiserfs mounted /lvm/misc I cp /dev/zero /lvm/misc If these 3 drives are on the internal qlogic isp controller, I have no problems. If these 3 drives are on the adaptec aha-2940UW, I get an oops (reply for oops

uptime for 2.2.13 on x86

2001-01-27 Thread Wakko Warner
What happens the day the machine hits 497 days uptime? -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

uptime for 2.2.13 on x86

2001-01-27 Thread Wakko Warner
What happens the day the machine hits 497 days uptime? -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

ibmcam C-It usb

2001-01-22 Thread Wakko Warner
In 2.4.0, the camera I have no longer works. It did in test9 I believe. fccid is ksx-x9903 I would have mailed the author, but I couldn't remember his address. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

cardbus nic modules

2001-01-22 Thread Wakko Warner
I've noticed, everytime I use a cardbus card, pcmcia-cs uses the name of the driver instead of eth0 (or eth1). If I need to upgrade pcmcia-cs, that's fine, but it appears to be a bug. pcmcia-cs version: 3.1.20 (debian v2) -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals -

cardbus nic modules

2001-01-22 Thread Wakko Warner
I've noticed, everytime I use a cardbus card, pcmcia-cs uses the name of the driver instead of eth0 (or eth1). If I need to upgrade pcmcia-cs, that's fine, but it appears to be a bug. pcmcia-cs version: 3.1.20 (debian v2) -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals -

ibmcam C-It usb

2001-01-22 Thread Wakko Warner
In 2.4.0, the camera I have no longer works. It did in test9 I believe. fccid is ksx-x9903 I would have mailed the author, but I couldn't remember his address. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Wakko Warner
> Not very portable at all... > > hpux = HP/UX 10.2 > > hpux:~$ mkdir foo > hpux:~$ cd foo > hpux:~/foo$ rmdir "`pwd`" > rmdir: /home/blc/foo: Cannot remove mountable directory > hpux:~/foo$ rmdir . > rmdir: cannot remove .. or . > hpux:~/foo$ rmdir /home/blc/foo > rmdir: /home/blc/foo: Cannot

Re: `rmdir .` doesn't work in 2.4

2001-01-08 Thread Wakko Warner
Not very portable at all... hpux = HP/UX 10.2 hpux:~$ mkdir foo hpux:~$ cd foo hpux:~/foo$ rmdir "`pwd`" rmdir: /home/blc/foo: Cannot remove mountable directory hpux:~/foo$ rmdir . rmdir: cannot remove .. or . hpux:~/foo$ rmdir /home/blc/foo rmdir: /home/blc/foo: Cannot remove

Slightly old kernel on alpha crash

2000-12-31 Thread Wakko Warner
This is 2.4.0-test12pre6. Wondering if anyone's looked into this yet. I have the 0.9LVM patch and REISERFS patch. I have attached the decoded oops -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals ksymoops 2.3.4 on alpha 2.4.0-test12-pre6-LVM-REISERFS. Options used

Slightly old kernel on alpha crash

2000-12-31 Thread Wakko Warner
This is 2.4.0-test12pre6. Wondering if anyone's looked into this yet. I have the 0.9LVM patch and REISERFS patch. I have attached the decoded oops -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals ksymoops 2.3.4 on alpha 2.4.0-test12-pre6-LVM-REISERFS. Options used

USB web cam

2000-12-28 Thread Wakko Warner
I really hate to ask on the list, but if I was to buy a usb web cam, what would be a good choice? I would have tried linux-usb, but I didn't know where it was, sorry. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

USB web cam

2000-12-28 Thread Wakko Warner
I really hate to ask on the list, but if I was to buy a usb web cam, what would be a good choice? I would have tried linux-usb, but I didn't know where it was, sorry. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: Major Failure 2.4.0-test12 Alpha

2000-12-14 Thread Wakko Warner
> Hello, > Just writing in to report a bug in 2.4.0-test12. > Hardware: > PCI-Matrox_Mill > PCI-Adaptec 39160 / 160M scsi card > PCI-Generic TNT-2 card > PCI-Sound blaster -128 (es1370) > > CPU 21164a - Alpha > > Problem: > There is a race condition in the aic7 driver that

Re: Major Failure 2.4.0-test12 Alpha

2000-12-14 Thread Wakko Warner
Hello, Just writing in to report a bug in 2.4.0-test12. Hardware: PCI-Matrox_Mill PCI-Adaptec 39160 / 160M scsi card PCI-Generic TNT-2 card PCI-Sound blaster -128 (es1370) CPU 21164a - Alpha Problem: There is a race condition in the aic7 driver that causes the

Re: how to capture long oops w/o having second machine

2000-12-12 Thread Wakko Warner
> What's the best way to capture (manually or otherwise) a rather long > oops that scrolls off my console without having a second machine? > > I'm gonna try to compile in a framebuffer and use a high resolution and > see if that'll hold it all when I get back later today. Tried using a printer?

Re: how to capture long oops w/o having second machine

2000-12-12 Thread Wakko Warner
What's the best way to capture (manually or otherwise) a rather long oops that scrolls off my console without having a second machine? I'm gonna try to compile in a framebuffer and use a high resolution and see if that'll hold it all when I get back later today. Tried using a printer?

Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools]

2000-12-11 Thread Wakko Warner
> Daryll> On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:34:59PM -0500, David Feuer wrote: > >> For what it's worth, I absolutely agree with this. I have the same > >> impression when I just see the word "dangerous". > > Daryll> Why not call a spade a spade and label it BROKEN. I do think > Daryll> that's stronger

Re: [Fwd: NTFS repair tools]

2000-12-11 Thread Wakko Warner
Daryll On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:34:59PM -0500, David Feuer wrote: For what it's worth, I absolutely agree with this. I have the same impression when I just see the word "dangerous". Daryll Why not call a spade a spade and label it BROKEN. I do think Daryll that's stronger than

Alpha crash: 2.4.0-test12-pre6 + LVM 0.9 + REISERFS 3.6.22

2000-12-09 Thread Wakko Warner
I'm not sure if this happened w/o reiserfs compiled or not. I didn't leave it running over night (crash happened about 07:00) Last thing in the log before this was st being loaded (I have a backup that starts at 06:00) I don't believe this has anything to do with the crash, but the machine

Alpha crash: 2.4.0-test12-pre6 + LVM 0.9 + REISERFS 3.6.22

2000-12-09 Thread Wakko Warner
I'm not sure if this happened w/o reiserfs compiled or not. I didn't leave it running over night (crash happened about 07:00) Last thing in the log before this was st being loaded (I have a backup that starts at 06:00) I don't believe this has anything to do with the crash, but the machine

2.4.0-test12-pre6 on alpha

2000-12-06 Thread Wakko Warner
I'm glad to say that this is the first 2.4 kernel that works on my noritake alpha with a pci-pci bridge. I have a small problem. If I reboot, the srm console can't boot from dka0. Doing a: show dev doesn't list any of the hard drives in the machine. doing an init causes it to reset and find all

Re: test12-pre6

2000-12-06 Thread Wakko Warner
Andrew Morton wrote: > Wakko Warner wrote: > > > > > - pre6: > > > - Andrew Morton: exec_usermodehelper fixes > > > > pre4 oopsed all over the place on my alpha with modules and autoloading > > turned on as soon as it mounted / and freed unused

Re: test12-pre6

2000-12-06 Thread Wakko Warner
> - pre6: > - Andrew Morton: exec_usermodehelper fixes pre4 oopsed all over the place on my alpha with modules and autoloading turned on as soon as it mounted / and freed unused memory. I take it this was seen on i386 as well? Will try pre6. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft

Re: test12-pre6

2000-12-06 Thread Wakko Warner
- pre6: - Andrew Morton: exec_usermodehelper fixes pre4 oopsed all over the place on my alpha with modules and autoloading turned on as soon as it mounted / and freed unused memory. I take it this was seen on i386 as well? Will try pre6. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes

2.4.0-test12-pre6 on alpha

2000-12-06 Thread Wakko Warner
I'm glad to say that this is the first 2.4 kernel that works on my noritake alpha with a pci-pci bridge. I have a small problem. If I reboot, the srm console can't boot from dka0. Doing a: show dev doesn't list any of the hard drives in the machine. doing an init causes it to reset and find all

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 boot failure (better than pre3 and lower)

2000-12-04 Thread Wakko Warner
> Most architectures dump their code as a string of bytes and print the > code after the registers and trace back. Alpha dumps the code before > the trace and also decodes the instructions which really confuses > ksymoops. Somebody changed 'Trace: ' to 'Trace:' between 2.2 and 2.4 > kernels so

2.4.0-test12-pre4 boot failure (better than pre3 and lower)

2000-12-04 Thread Wakko Warner
PCI patches that were added between pre3 and pre4 allow me to boot the kernel on my noritake alpha. Once it boots, however, it oops's in the swapper. I've tried a few times in the past to use ksymoops on oops's on the alpha arch, but it doesn't appear to work. (I'm using the ksymoops that's

2.4.0-test12-pre4 boot failure (better than pre3 and lower)

2000-12-04 Thread Wakko Warner
PCI patches that were added between pre3 and pre4 allow me to boot the kernel on my noritake alpha. Once it boots, however, it oops's in the swapper. I've tried a few times in the past to use ksymoops on oops's on the alpha arch, but it doesn't appear to work. (I'm using the ksymoops that's

Re: 2.4.0-test12-pre4 boot failure (better than pre3 and lower)

2000-12-04 Thread Wakko Warner
Most architectures dump their code as a string of bytes and print the code after the registers and trace back. Alpha dumps the code before the trace and also decodes the instructions which really confuses ksymoops. Somebody changed 'Trace: ' to 'Trace:' between 2.2 and 2.4 kernels so

Re: [patch] Re: test12-pre2

2000-12-03 Thread Wakko Warner
> > It just oops continuously. It finds the scsi drives and says it's enabling > > a few pci devices but it scrolls too fast to see what it really does > > If it finds scsi drives, PCI setup is probably ok. There could be > a lot of other problems - too much changes since 2.2. > > Capturing

Re: [patch] Re: test12-pre2

2000-12-03 Thread Wakko Warner
It just oops continuously. It finds the scsi drives and says it's enabling a few pci devices but it scrolls too fast to see what it really does If it finds scsi drives, PCI setup is probably ok. There could be a lot of other problems - too much changes since 2.2. Capturing kernel

Re: test12-pre2

2000-11-29 Thread Wakko Warner
> > Ok, I won't have time this morning to try it, but I'll try it when I get off > > work > > Ok. If that patch won't help, here is another one - setting > cacheline/latency also might cause a trouble. the patch helped, but it ooped after finding the last scsi drive (the cdrom). I'll try

Re: test12-pre2

2000-11-29 Thread Wakko Warner
Ok, I won't have time this morning to try it, but I'll try it when I get off work Ok. If that patch won't help, here is another one - setting cacheline/latency also might cause a trouble. the patch helped, but it ooped after finding the last scsi drive (the cdrom). I'll try removing the

Re: test12-pre2

2000-11-28 Thread Wakko Warner
> - pre2: > - Richard Henderson: PCI bridge initialization on alpha Doesn't boot on noritake alpha. It gets to POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX and hard locks. the halt switch doesn't even work. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe

Re: test12-pre2

2000-11-28 Thread Wakko Warner
- pre2: - Richard Henderson: PCI bridge initialization on alpha Doesn't boot on noritake alpha. It gets to POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX and hard locks. the halt switch doesn't even work. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe

2.4.0-test11 failure on sparc

2000-11-21 Thread Wakko Warner
The changes between test10 and test11 broke st.o, nfs.o, runrpc.o and lockd.o It's the same unresolved symbol every time: # insmod st Using /lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/drivers/scsi/st.o /lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/drivers/scsi/st.o: unresolved symbol __up

2.4.0-test11 failure on sparc

2000-11-21 Thread Wakko Warner
The changes between test10 and test11 broke st.o, nfs.o, runrpc.o and lockd.o It's the same unresolved symbol every time: # insmod st Using /lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/drivers/scsi/st.o /lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/drivers/scsi/st.o: unresolved symbol __up

2.4.0-test10 on sparc

2000-11-20 Thread Wakko Warner
I noticed 2 things. One is quite annoying. 1) sunlance: Nov 19 19:09:49 sparq kernel: eth0: Carrier Lost, trying AUI Nov 19 19:09:52 sparq kernel: eth0: Carrier Lost, trying TPE This has been going on for some time since it has been up. But I think something oopsed to cause this 2) the oops.

2.4.0-test10 on sparc

2000-11-20 Thread Wakko Warner
I noticed 2 things. One is quite annoying. 1) sunlance: Nov 19 19:09:49 sparq kernel: eth0: Carrier Lost, trying AUI Nov 19 19:09:52 sparq kernel: eth0: Carrier Lost, trying TPE This has been going on for some time since it has been up. But I think something oopsed to cause this 2) the oops.

Re: PCI-PCI bridges mess in 2.4.x

2000-11-09 Thread Wakko Warner
> It was posted to lkml, so no link (except if you want to dig through > lkml mail archives). It booted but then it oops'ed before userland I belive. I tried it this morning and didn't have much time. It did find the scsi controller (which is across the bridge) and the drives attached so it

Re: PCI-PCI bridges mess in 2.4.x

2000-11-09 Thread Wakko Warner
> It was posted to lkml, so no link (except if you want to dig through > lkml mail archives). It booted but then it oops'ed before userland I belive. I tried it this morning and didn't have much time. It did find the scsi controller (which is across the bridge) and the drives attached so it

Re: PCI-PCI bridges mess in 2.4.x

2000-11-09 Thread Wakko Warner
It was posted to lkml, so no link (except if you want to dig through lkml mail archives). It booted but then it oops'ed before userland I belive. I tried it this morning and didn't have much time. It did find the scsi controller (which is across the bridge) and the drives attached so it does

Re: PCI-PCI bridges mess in 2.4.x

2000-11-09 Thread Wakko Warner
It was posted to lkml, so no link (except if you want to dig through lkml mail archives). It booted but then it oops'ed before userland I belive. I tried it this morning and didn't have much time. It did find the scsi controller (which is across the bridge) and the drives attached so it does

Re: Dual XEON - >>SLOW<< on SMP

2000-11-02 Thread Wakko Warner
> > I'm seeing this as well, but only with PIII Xeon systems, not PII > > Xeon. Every single timer interrupt on any CPU is accompanied by a NMI > > and LOC increment on every CPU. > > > >CPU0 CPU1 > > 0: 146727 153389IO-APIC-edge timer > > [...] > > NMI:

Re: Dual XEON - SLOW on SMP

2000-11-02 Thread Wakko Warner
I'm seeing this as well, but only with PIII Xeon systems, not PII Xeon. Every single timer interrupt on any CPU is accompanied by a NMI and LOC increment on every CPU. CPU0 CPU1 0: 146727 153389IO-APIC-edge timer [...] NMI: 300035

Re: RAID superblock

2000-10-29 Thread Wakko Warner
> > [Wakko Warner] > > > While this subject is fresh, what would be wrong with using the > > > entire drive as opposed to creating a partition and adding the > > > partition to the raid? > > > > Does it autodetect an entire drive? The autodetect log

Re: 2.4.0-test9 + LFS

2000-10-27 Thread Wakko Warner
> > I did upgrade that and it didn't help anything. > > Was your glibc compiled against 2.4 kernel headers? That I do not know. it's v 2.1.99 that came with debian in the past week or so -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: 2.4.0-test9 + LFS

2000-10-27 Thread Wakko Warner
> > I attempted to create a 4gb sparce file with dd. It failed. > > I created one that was 2.1gb in size which worked. Then I appeneded more > > junk to the end of the file making it over 2.2gb. > > > > doing an ls -l shows: > > ls: x: Value too large for defined data type > > > > NOTE: this

Re: 2.4.0-test9 + LFS

2000-10-27 Thread Wakko Warner
I attempted to create a 4gb sparce file with dd. It failed. I created one that was 2.1gb in size which worked. Then I appeneded more junk to the end of the file making it over 2.2gb. doing an ls -l shows: ls: x: Value too large for defined data type NOTE: this worked in

Re: 2.4.0-test9 + LFS

2000-10-27 Thread Wakko Warner
I did upgrade that and it didn't help anything. Was your glibc compiled against 2.4 kernel headers? That I do not know. it's v 2.1.99 that came with debian in the past week or so -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send

2.4.0-test9 + LFS

2000-10-26 Thread Wakko Warner
I attempted to create a 4gb sparce file with dd. It failed. I created one that was 2.1gb in size which worked. Then I appeneded more junk to the end of the file making it over 2.2gb. doing an ls -l shows: ls: x: Value too large for defined data type NOTE: this worked in 2.4.0-test6 and I

Re: RAID superblock

2000-10-26 Thread Wakko Warner
> > Hi, > > After I create a RAID setup on the drives,The > > superblock will be generated at the end of the drives. > > If I move these drives to other linux system, will > > this > > system recognise the RAID setup without reconfiguring > > the Linux ? > > If the CHS / LBA settings are the

Re: RAID superblock

2000-10-26 Thread Wakko Warner
Hi, After I create a RAID setup on the drives,The superblock will be generated at the end of the drives. If I move these drives to other linux system, will this system recognise the RAID setup without reconfiguring the Linux ? If the CHS / LBA settings are the same, and the

2.4.0-test9 + LFS

2000-10-26 Thread Wakko Warner
I attempted to create a 4gb sparce file with dd. It failed. I created one that was 2.1gb in size which worked. Then I appeneded more junk to the end of the file making it over 2.2gb. doing an ls -l shows: ls: x: Value too large for defined data type NOTE: this worked in 2.4.0-test6 and I

Re: make -j 2 broken?

2000-10-23 Thread Wakko Warner
> Trying to compile the current kernel (test10-pre4) with: > > > make clean > > make -j 2 bzImages modules modules_install > > will try to install the modules before they are built... > This has previously been working (at least in early testX kernels). I've done it before when I wasn't

Re: make -j 2 broken?

2000-10-23 Thread Wakko Warner
Trying to compile the current kernel (test10-pre4) with: make clean make -j 2 bzImages modules modules_install will try to install the modules before they are built... This has previously been working (at least in early testX kernels). I've done it before when I wasn't thinking,

raid2 patches for 2.2.x

2000-10-22 Thread Wakko Warner
Something higher than the one for kernel 2.2.11 I found it once, but I can't find it again. (and people.redhat.com isn't accepting http connections) -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

raid2 patches for 2.2.x

2000-10-22 Thread Wakko Warner
Something higher than the one for kernel 2.2.11 I found it once, but I can't find it again. (and people.redhat.com isn't accepting http connections) -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Supermicro 370DE6

2000-10-18 Thread Wakko Warner
Has anyone tried this board with any recent 2.2 or 2.4 kernel? It has: Onboard Intel 82559 Ethernet controller Onboard Adaptec AIC-7899 dual channel Ultra160 SCSI controller ServerWorks ServerSet III HE-SL Chipset -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To

Re: test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Wakko Warner
Doesn't boot on alpha systems with pci-pci bridges. I sent a report about this a couple days ago and noone responds. > There's a test10-2 out there. > > Notable change to people Cc'd on this mail: this contains the fix for the > vmalloc() and ioremap() race condition, which deletes the

Re: test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Wakko Warner
Doesn't boot on alpha systems with pci-pci bridges. I sent a report about this a couple days ago and noone responds. There's a test10-2 out there. Notable change to people Cc'd on this mail: this contains the fix for the vmalloc() and ioremap() race condition, which deletes the set_pgdir()

2.4.0-test9 boot failure (alpha noritake)

2000-10-11 Thread Wakko Warner
Booting test9 gives me: PCI: failed to allocate resource 0 for: Q Logic ISP1020 PCI: failed to allocate resource 0 for: PCI: failed to allocate resource 0 for: <3com card> Then it gets to: Net4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. and hard locks this is an alphaserver 1000a

2.4.0-test9 boot failure (alpha noritake)

2000-10-11 Thread Wakko Warner
Booting test9 gives me: PCI: failed to allocate resource 0 for: Q Logic ISP1020 PCI: failed to allocate resource 0 for: dec tulip card PCI: failed to allocate resource 0 for: 3com card Then it gets to: Net4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. and hard locks this is an alphaserver

Reiserfs + 2.2.18 + alpha noritake

2000-10-09 Thread Wakko Warner
Anyone tried this combination? I had one small compile problem in the driver (which was a return code, something about HASH, I forget now, but it's only defined for i386) After that, mkfs and attempted to mount didn't work. the driver couldn't find a valid fs on the drive. I have successfully

Reiserfs + 2.2.18 + alpha noritake

2000-10-09 Thread Wakko Warner
Anyone tried this combination? I had one small compile problem in the driver (which was a return code, something about HASH, I forget now, but it's only defined for i386) After that, mkfs and attempted to mount didn't work. the driver couldn't find a valid fs on the drive. I have successfully

ramfs in 2.4.0-test6

2000-09-30 Thread Wakko Warner
I didn't try -test8 since it's LFS seems broken. But anyway, I was able to crash a machine using ramfs when I filled it up. I got "Kernel panic: attempted to kill init" on the console -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send

ramfs in 2.4.0-test6

2000-09-30 Thread Wakko Warner
I didn't try -test8 since it's LFS seems broken. But anyway, I was able to crash a machine using ramfs when I filled it up. I got "Kernel panic: attempted to kill init" on the console -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: 2.4 kernels do not boot on UX (Alpha)

2000-09-25 Thread Wakko Warner
> > PCI: Failed to allocate resource 1 for Symbios Logic Inc. (formerly > >NCR) 53c875 > ... > > This is a PCI layout as reported by 'lspci -tv': > > > > -[00]-+-0d.0-[01]--+-0a.0 Trident Microsystems 4DWave DX > > |\-0d.0 Symbios Logic Inc. (formerly NCR) 53c875 >

Re: 2.4 kernels do not boot on UX (Alpha)

2000-09-25 Thread Wakko Warner
PCI: Failed to allocate resource 1 for Symbios Logic Inc. (formerly NCR) 53c875 ... This is a PCI layout as reported by 'lspci -tv': -[00]-+-0d.0-[01]--+-0a.0 Trident Microsystems 4DWave DX |\-0d.0 Symbios Logic Inc. (formerly NCR) 53c875 ... Any ideas

2.2.17 compile error in ipconfig.c

2000-09-24 Thread Wakko Warner
I'm compiling this kernel for a diskless machine. I have bootp configured as the only way for the kernel to get the IP. Here's the error: cc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/gohan/2.2.17/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -D__SMP__ -pipe

2.2.17 compile error in ipconfig.c

2000-09-24 Thread Wakko Warner
I'm compiling this kernel for a diskless machine. I have bootp configured as the only way for the kernel to get the IP. Here's the error: cc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/gohan/2.2.17/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -D__SMP__ -pipe

Re: PERCRAID 3 drivers?

2000-09-17 Thread Wakko Warner
> The organization I do some work for purchased a rackmount server from > Dell with the intent of running some webconferencing software under > Linux. The salesman we had spoken to assured us that Linux fully > supported the machine. Yeah... Right... :) > > Now it seems I'm stuck with a

Re: PERCRAID 3 drivers?

2000-09-17 Thread Wakko Warner
The organization I do some work for purchased a rackmount server from Dell with the intent of running some webconferencing software under Linux. The salesman we had spoken to assured us that Linux fully supported the machine. sarcasm Yeah... Right... /sarcasm :) Now it seems I'm stuck

Re: Update Linux 2.4 Status/TODO list

2000-09-15 Thread Wakko Warner
I have an alpha noritake that won't run any 2.4.0-test kernel (last 2 tried were -test6 and 7) 7 seems to think that all pci devices are on irq 0 -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

2.4.0-test* on alpha noritake

2000-09-07 Thread Wakko Warner
-test7 was the first one I tried that actually booted, the rest just froze. I only tried 2 kernels. The first was compiled with CONFIG_ALPHA_LEGACY_START_ADDRESS set to n, and the 2nd was with y. First was -test6 when booting -test7, it can't find any IRQs for the PCI devices. This is an

2.4.0-test* on alpha noritake

2000-09-07 Thread Wakko Warner
-test7 was the first one I tried that actually booted, the rest just froze. I only tried 2 kernels. The first was compiled with CONFIG_ALPHA_LEGACY_START_ADDRESS set to n, and the 2nd was with y. First was -test6 when booting -test7, it can't find any IRQs for the PCI devices. This is an

<    1   2   3