Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Does anyone know what NTFS version the NT 3.1 / 3.51 volumes had? If I
> know I can make sure we don't mount such beasts considering we know
> the driver would fail on them... - I am aware of only one person stil
> using NT 3.51 and he doesn't believe in the
Martin von Loewis wrote:
>That would not work: NT would split individual runs across extends
>(i.e. split them in the middle). Did I misunderstand, or do you have a
>solution for that as well.
>
Are you sure that it's true? My NTFS resizer interprets parts of runlist
stored in different FILE
Martin von Loewis wrote:
That would not work: NT would split individual runs across extends
(i.e. split them in the middle). Did I misunderstand, or do you have a
solution for that as well.
Are you sure that it's true? My NTFS resizer interprets parts of runlist
stored in different FILE
3 matches
Mail list logo
