On 3/7/21 12:25 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 08:06:44PM +0800, zhangkun...@163.com wrote:
>> From: Zhang Kun <zhang...@cdjrlc.com>
>>
>> The value assigned to len by sg_pcopy_from_buffer() never used for
>> anything, so remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Kun <zhang...@cdjrlc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
>> index bd27bd670104..6ebda89d476c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
>> @@ -1335,7 +1335,6 @@ static bool xhci_urb_temp_buffer_required(struct
>> usb_hcd *hcd,
>>
>> static void xhci_unmap_temp_buf(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb)
>> {
>> - unsigned int len;
>> unsigned int buf_len;
>> enum dma_data_direction dir;
>>
>> @@ -1351,7 +1350,7 @@ static void xhci_unmap_temp_buf(struct usb_hcd *hcd,
>> struct urb *urb)
>> dir);
>>
>> if (usb_urb_dir_in(urb))
>> - len = sg_pcopy_from_buffer(urb->sg, urb->num_sgs,
>> + sg_pcopy_from_buffer(urb->sg, urb->num_sgs,
>> urb->transfer_buffer,
>> buf_len,
>> 0);
>
> SHouldn't this be checked instead of ignored?
>
Hi, Greg.
Considering your tips I checked sg_pcopy_from_buffer(). it copys data
from urb->transfer_buffer to urb->sg, and only returns 0 or the
'number of copied bytes', and seems to has no other exception branchs
that need to be checked. So I think it should be ingnored.
It may also be that I missed something, if that's the case, please
correct me.
Thanks,
Zhang
