contacting the listed maintainer a few months ago but received
no response.
I've tested that this still applies to and compiles against 2.6.21.
Signed-off-by: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/char/moxa.c b/drivers/char/moxa.c
index 7dbaee8..e0d35c2 100644
--- a/drivers/char/moxa.c
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:46:24AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:12:57 -0700, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Users have reported a symlink issue with my recent smbfs backport.
> >Turns out my backport overlooked a second 2.6 pa
an issue that was already fixed in 2.6, and that
fix is more complete than my previous one. You'll need the additional
userspace patches to use the server-provided perms (i.e., get rid of
the +x bits).
--
dann frazier
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne
, and also cleans up an unnecessary double assignment. As his
commit message notes, you will need the userspace patches from Samba
Bug #999 in order to use the permission/ownership assigned by the
server.
Signed-off-by: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/fs/smbfs/inode.c b/fs/smbfs/i
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:03:21AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Grant !
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:52:44AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:05:44 -0700, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:03:21AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Grant !
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:52:44AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:05:44 -0700, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:00:40PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
Ah, think I
, and also cleans up an unnecessary double assignment. As his
commit message notes, you will need the userspace patches from Samba
Bug #999 in order to use the permission/ownership assigned by the
server.
Signed-off-by: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/fs/smbfs/inode.c b/fs/smbfs/inode.c
that was already fixed in 2.6, and that
fix is more complete than my previous one. You'll need the additional
userspace patches to use the server-provided perms (i.e., get rid of
the +x bits).
--
dann frazier
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:46:24AM +1100, Grant Coady wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:12:57 -0700, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Users have reported a symlink issue with my recent smbfs backport.
Turns out my backport overlooked a second 2.6 patch w/ the fix:
http://linux.bkbits.net
t options. When the behavior needs
to change to honor them, I'll try to match what current 2.6
does. Make sense?
--
dann frazier
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
does. Make sense?
--
dann frazier
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:00:40PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:55:19PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > @@ -505,8 +510,13 @@
> > mnt->file_mode = (oldmnt->file_mode & S_IRWXUGO) | S_IFREG;
> > mnt->dir_mo
gt; blk_start_queue() when you set ->busy_configuring to 0.
> >
> > Jens, please see Chase's reply to your concerns:
> > > busy_configuring - I do not think this is racy. This
> > > flag is used only when we are removing/deleting a disk. In
> > > this cas
deleted. This flag could be called busy_deleting.
Ok, no worries then if it's simply a going away flag. I wonder if it's
needed at all, but it certainly doesn't hurt.
hey Jens,
Just a poke since I haven't seen this change go into your block
tree. Is it still in-plan?
--
dann frazier
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:00:40PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:55:19PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
@@ -505,8 +510,13 @@
mnt-file_mode = (oldmnt-file_mode S_IRWXUGO) | S_IFREG;
mnt-dir_mode = (oldmnt-dir_mode S_IRWXUGO) | S_IFDIR
's certainly a cut & paste error. But the
end result appears to match current 2.6, which was the intent.
> Also, would not it be necessary to add "|S_IFLNK" to the file_mode ? Maybe
> what I say is stupid, but it's just a guess.
I really don't know the correct answer to that, I was
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:55:19PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Dann, do you still have your samba server ready to try to reproduce this
> problem ? Also, there are very suspect lines right there in the patch :
I can set it up again, hopefully have some feedback by tomorrow.
--
dann f
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:55:19PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Dann, do you still have your samba server ready to try to reproduce this
problem ? Also, there are very suspect lines right there in the patch :
I can set it up again, hopefully have some feedback by tomorrow.
--
dann frazier
to the file_mode ? Maybe
what I say is stupid, but it's just a guess.
I really don't know the correct answer to that, I was merely copying
the 2.6 flags.
[Still working on getting a 2.4 smbfs test system up...]
--
dann frazier
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
bugs.debian.org/404927 for details).
--
dann frazier
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
for details).
--
dann frazier
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 03, dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can you elaborate on what you believe the kernel is doing
> > incorrectly? My first guess would be the setting of the removable
> > flag, but aacraid claims to be setting this to prevent partit
d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 03, dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you elaborate on what you believe the kernel is doing
incorrectly? My first guess would be the setting of the removable
flag, but aacraid claims to be setting this to prevent partition table
caching - do you believe
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 04:16:39PM -0600, Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote:
> H. Dann, did you see this on 32-bit Debian?
yep - all reports I've seen so far are on i386
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
one is connected
> to an MSA500. Do either of you have MSA500? What controller fw are you
> running? Check /proc/driver/cciss/ccissN.
fyi, we've been seeing this in Debian too (which is why Mike added me
to the CC list), and I've narrowed it down to the 2TB patch that went
into 2.6.19:
ht
narrowed it down to the 2TB patch that went
into 2.6.19:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=402787
--
dann frazier | HP Open Source and Linux Organization
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 04:16:39PM -0600, Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote:
H. Dann, did you see this on 32-bit Debian?
yep - all reports I've seen so far are on i386
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
