Re: TCP MSG_PEEK assertion issue ...

2007-03-09 Thread davef1624
Apologies ... I definitely had no idea where to post this thanks! Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sent: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 4:10 PM Subject: Re: TCP MSG_PEEK assertion issue ... Keep trying, you might hit the proper

TCP MSG_PEEK assertion issue ...

2007-03-09 Thread davef1624
Hello, I periodically see the following TCP kernel assertion errors in /var/log/message (it does seem that networking is eventually able to recover from these errors): kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1171) kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags &

TCP MSG_PEEK kernel assertions ...

2007-03-09 Thread davef1624
Hello, I periodically see the following TCP kernel assertion errors in /var/log/message (it does seem that networking is eventually able to recover from these errors): kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1171) kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags &

TCP MSG_PEEK kernel assertions ...

2007-03-09 Thread davef1624
Hello, I periodically see the following TCP kernel assertion errors in /var/log/message (it does seem that networking is eventually able to recover from these errors): kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1171) kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags

TCP MSG_PEEK assertion issue ...

2007-03-09 Thread davef1624
Hello, I periodically see the following TCP kernel assertion errors in /var/log/message (it does seem that networking is eventually able to recover from these errors): kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1171) kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags MSG_PEEK)

Re: TCP MSG_PEEK assertion issue ...

2007-03-09 Thread davef1624
Apologies ... I definitely had no idea where to post this thanks! Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sent: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 4:10 PM Subject: Re: TCP MSG_PEEK assertion issue ... Keep trying, you might hit the proper