El Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:03:19 +0200 (CEST), "Indan Zupancic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Perhaps one of the reasons is that this is core kernel code. And that it
> isn't a new
> feature, but a performance improvement with doubtful trade-offs. The problem
> statement isn't clear either. It see
El Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:06:14 -0700, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> how do you know there will be other activity? You start the IO and that
> basically blacks out the disk for 5 to 10 ms. If the "real" IO gets
> submitted in that time you add latency. You cannot predict that IO
>
El Sat, 2 Dec 2006 21:42:13 +,
Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I disagree. They can be very useful for tracking people down, and also
If their mission is to be useful, they should at least have a
"[EMAIL PROTECTED] (broken address)"
warning.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
3 matches
Mail list logo
