Quim K Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then maybe the attached patch is what you want? This also replaces
> `+' on the next line with `^' to avoid slanted distribution.
Thanks. The use of + in a hash-formula is usually all right, though. It's
XOR with carry propagation; when there's some pa
Excuse me for the lack of patch in this mail, but I'm currently
suffering some connection-troubles... Please Cc replies to me.
In 2.4.x, linux/fs/inode.c has a hash() function with a small slip-up.
The inode hash-value is initialized with "unsigned long tmp = i_ino |
((unsigned long) sb / L1_CACH
2 matches
Mail list logo
