Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf report: Add raw report support for s390 auxiliary trace

2018-08-07 Thread mpe
Thomas Richter writes: > Add support for s390 auxiliary trace support. > Use 'perf record -e rbd000' to create the perf.data file. > The event also has the symbolic name SF_CYCLES_BASIC_DIAG, > using 'perf record -e SF_CYCLES_BASIC_DIAG' is equivalent. ... > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter >

Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf report: Add raw report support for s390 auxiliary trace

2018-08-07 Thread mpe
Thomas Richter writes: > Add support for s390 auxiliary trace support. > Use 'perf record -e rbd000' to create the perf.data file. > The event also has the symbolic name SF_CYCLES_BASIC_DIAG, > using 'perf record -e SF_CYCLES_BASIC_DIAG' is equivalent. ... > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter >

Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] mm: move vma_is_anonymous check within pmd_move_must_withdraw

2016-11-14 Thread mpe
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes: > Architectures like ppc64 want to use page table deposit/withraw > even with huge pmd dax entries. Allow arch to override the > vma_is_anonymous check by moving that to pmd_move_must_withdraw > function > > Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov

Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] mm: move vma_is_anonymous check within pmd_move_must_withdraw

2016-11-14 Thread mpe
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes: > Architectures like ppc64 want to use page table deposit/withraw > even with huge pmd dax entries. Allow arch to override the > vma_is_anonymous check by moving that to pmd_move_must_withdraw > function > > Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar

Re: [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64

2016-06-17 Thread mpe
On 2016-06-13 15:40, Naveen N. Rao wrote: On 2016/06/10 10:47PM, David Miller wrote: From: "Naveen N. Rao" Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:02:17 +0530 > Please note that patch [2] is a pre-requisite for this patchset, and is > not yet upstream. ... > [1]

Re: [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64

2016-06-17 Thread mpe
On 2016-06-13 15:40, Naveen N. Rao wrote: On 2016/06/10 10:47PM, David Miller wrote: From: "Naveen N. Rao" Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:02:17 +0530 > Please note that patch [2] is a pre-requisite for this patchset, and is > not yet upstream. ... > [1]