> Could I add your Tested-by line to patch series?
Yes, by: Philip Soares
Thank you for the patches!
> Could you test if 1.155V voltage for L1 is stable on 1.2 GHz variant?
++#define MIN_VOLT_MV_FOR_L1_1200MHZ 1155
...
++ if (avs_min_l1 > dvfs->avs[0])
++ avs_min_l1 = dvfs->avs[0];
++
++ if (dvfs->avs[1] < avs_min_l1)
++ dvfs->av
> Therefore I'm thinking if the correct way is instead to use L1 := L0 voltage
> value for 1/1.2 GHz mode.
This latest 04/10 works fine for me going 600MHz <-> 1.2GHz under with and
without load.
> Could you test following change instead of PATCH 04/10? I added here also
> logic for 1.2 GHz variant with 1.132 V value another change is that
> value for load L0 is not touched as it is stable.
These changes to patch 04/10 worked going 600 MHz <-> 1.2 GHz , _but_ only with:
++#define MIN_VOLT
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021, at 2:01 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2021 16:41:13 nnet wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Thursday 11 February 2021 12:22:52 nnet wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 11:55 AM,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2021 12:22:52 nnet wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 11:55 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 10 February 2021 11:08:59 nnet wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, at 11:55 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 February 2021 11:08:59 nnet wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 10:03 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > Hello! Could you please enable userspace governor during kern
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 10:03 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 February 2021 09:34:07 nnet wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 1:23 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 February 2021 18:07:41 nnet wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:51 PM, nnet
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, at 1:23 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2021 18:07:41 nnet wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:51 PM, nnet wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:31 PM, nnet wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Marek Behún wrote:
>
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:51 PM, nnet wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:31 PM, nnet wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Marek Behún wrote:
> > > On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:16:45 -0800
> > > nnet wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've two of the
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 5:31 PM, nnet wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Marek Behún wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:16:45 -0800
> > nnet wrote:
> >
> > > I've two of these and I've just swapped them (and re-pasted the heat
> > > sinks
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Marek Behún wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:16:45 -0800
> nnet wrote:
>
> > I've two of these and I've just swapped them (and re-pasted the heat sinks).
> >
> > The second one ran under load for awhile and now has frozen as
eze.
They fine with both those workloads @1000_800.
Perhaps it's heat? Unfortunately I don't have any numbers on that ATM.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 2:56 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2021 14:52:56 nnet wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 2:42 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 2:42 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:45:08 nnet wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:00:26 nnet wrote:
> > > > > If you have other Armada 3720 board
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, at 1:33 PM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2021 13:00:26 nnet wrote:
> > > If you have other Armada 3720 boards (Espressobin v5/v7, uDPU, Devel
> > > Board, ...) then it will be nice to do an additional tests and check if
> > >
> If you have other Armada 3720 boards (Espressobin v5/v7, uDPU, Devel Board,
> ...) then it will be nice to do an additional tests and check if instability
> issues are finally fixed.
These patches applied to the 5.4.96 in OpenWrt (98d61b5) work fine so far on an
Espressobin v7 AFAICT per chan
16 matches
Mail list logo
