/ and
complete the information requested to confirm your Email Account Active.
NOTICE: Failure to confirm your Email Account Active may lead to
De-activation and all your email data will be lost permanently.
Secured by Email Spam Threat Management.
© 2017 . All rights reserved.
Email Account Help Desk
/ and
complete the information requested to confirm your Email Account Active.
NOTICE: Failure to confirm your Email Account Active may lead to
De-activation and all your email data will be lost permanently.
Secured by Email Spam Threat Management.
© 2017 . All rights reserved.
Email Account Help Desk
Hello --
Your message was tagged as spam by an automated testing program.
Unless we receive a reply to this notice, the message will be set aside and
will not be seen or acted on by anyone.
Therefore, please reply to this message as soon as possible.
If you did not send any mail to an email
Hello --
Your message was tagged as spam by an automated testing program.
Unless we receive a reply to this notice, the message will be set aside and
will not be seen or acted on by anyone.
Therefore, please reply to this message as soon as possible.
If you did not send any mail to an email
Sie benötigen einen Investor?
Wenn Sie Geschäfts-oder Privatkredite müssen?
Wir geben Kredite an jedem einzelnen Unternehmen und bei 3% Zinsen
jährlich. Für weitere Informationen, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte.
Vorname:
Adresse:
Telefon:
Land:
Alter:
Geschlecht:
Monatliches Einkommen:
Sie benötigen einen Investor?
Wenn Sie Geschäfts-oder Privatkredite müssen?
Wir geben Kredite an jedem einzelnen Unternehmen und bei 3% Zinsen
jährlich. Für weitere Informationen, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte.
Vorname:
Adresse:
Telefon:
Land:
Alter:
Geschlecht:
Monatliches Einkommen:
Hi all,
I know there have been some discussions regarding an IDLE scheduler
priority, but by now this is about 4 years ago without any major
results besides the new SCHED_BATCH priority, which works quite
differently from the original idle priority. (Or did I miss something?)
So I wanted to
Hi all,
I know there have been some discussions regarding an IDLE scheduler
priority, but by now this is about 4 years ago without any major
results besides the new SCHED_BATCH priority, which works quite
differently from the original idle priority. (Or did I miss something?)
So I wanted to
hi,
i created a 10mb file called .enc2 with random data and ran "# losetup -e
serpent -k 128 /dev/loop0 /mnt/hda7/.enc2"
then i ran "# mke2fs /dev/loop0" and tried to "# mount /dev/loop0 /enc". but
i get the following error messages when trying to mount:
May 19 21:32:10 HOST2 kernel: EXT2-fs
hi,
i created a 10mb file called .enc2 with random data and ran # losetup -e
serpent -k 128 /dev/loop0 /mnt/hda7/.enc2
then i ran # mke2fs /dev/loop0 and tried to # mount /dev/loop0 /enc. but
i get the following error messages when trying to mount:
May 19 21:32:10 HOST2 kernel: EXT2-fs error
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Paul Fulghum wrote:
> When in fact according to this linux-kernel post:
> http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9912.1/0653.html
> they are goats that eat fermented potatoes.
Hahaha, gotta love flame wars =)
pavel
--
Bask in the glow of the digital silence
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Paul Fulghum wrote:
When in fact according to this linux-kernel post:
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9912.1/0653.html
they are goats that eat fermented potatoes.
Hahaha, gotta love flame wars =)
pavel
--
Bask in the glow of the digital silence
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Mark Hahn wrote:
> Linux is a good Unix. if adding "enterpriseness" means violating its
> Unixness, then yes, the goals are bullshit. in particular, the kind
> of extensive, kernel-based auditing and accounting some people talk about,
> as well as the complete
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Michael Rothwell wrote:
>
> > One historically significant "Enterprise" OS is Multics. It had nine
> > major goals. Perhaps we should think about how Linux measures up to
> > these 1965 goals for "Enterprise Computing."
> >
>
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Michael Rothwell wrote:
One historically significant "Enterprise" OS is Multics. It had nine
major goals. Perhaps we should think about how Linux measures up to
these 1965 goals for "Enterprise Computing."
2
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Mark Hahn wrote:
Linux is a good Unix. if adding "enterpriseness" means violating its
Unixness, then yes, the goals are bullshit. in particular, the kind
of extensive, kernel-based auditing and accounting some people talk about,
as well as the complete evisceration
16 matches
Mail list logo
