[PATCH] skip increamenting nr for TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE

2013-12-21 Thread Vaibhav Shinde
oon as it returns from uninterruptible state. Therefore do not increament thread count for threads with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. Signed-off-by: Ajeet Yadav Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Shinde --- fs/coredump.c |3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b

[PATCH] skip increamenting nr for TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE

2013-12-21 Thread Vaibhav Shinde
, as it will get killed as soon as it returns from uninterruptible state. Therefore do not increament thread count for threads with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. Signed-off-by: Ajeet Yadav ajeet.yadav...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Shinde v.bhav.shi...@gmail.com --- fs/coredump.c |3 ++- 1 file

Re: DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW issue on ARM

2012-10-11 Thread vaibhav shinde
Hi Russel, On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 05:18:56PM +0530, trisha yad wrote: > > I wish to know how can I support this function in 3.0 ? > > If your description is correct, then all you need to do is to ensure > that you route

Re: DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW issue on ARM

2012-10-11 Thread vaibhav shinde
Hi Russel, On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 05:18:56PM +0530, trisha yad wrote: I wish to know how can I support this function in 3.0 ? If your description is correct, then all you need to do is to ensure that