On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
SNIP
>
> |
> | - to add an ABI to support those vendor files
> |
> | And those are IMHO five good technical reasons to disagree with your
> | approach.
> |
> | My suggestion to resolve the technical objections and lift
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 01:09:54PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 05:31:26PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > |
> > > | - to blindly follow some poorly constructed vendor format with no
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 01:09:54PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 05:31:26PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
SNIP
|
| - to blindly follow some poorly constructed vendor format with no
|high
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
SNIP
|
| - to add an ABI to support those vendor files
|
| And those are IMHO five good technical reasons to disagree with your
| approach.
|
| My suggestion to resolve the technical objections and lift the NAK
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 05:31:26PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > |
> > | - to blindly follow some poorly constructed vendor format with no
> > |high level structure, that IMHO didn't work very well when
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
SNIP
> |
> | - to blindly follow some poorly constructed vendor format with no
> |high level structure, that IMHO didn't work very well when OProfile
> |was written, and misrepresenting it as 'symbolic event names'.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
SNIP
|
| - to blindly follow some poorly constructed vendor format with no
|high level structure, that IMHO didn't work very well when OProfile
|was written, and misrepresenting it as 'symbolic event names'.
|
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 05:31:26PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
SNIP
|
| - to blindly follow some poorly constructed vendor format with no
|high level structure, that IMHO didn't work very well when OProfile
|
|
| * Michael Ellerman wrote:
|
| > > We just merged a patch series that was first sent in 2013. Some
| > > things take time to get right.
| >
| > The first attempt to get symbolic event name support into perf was
| > sent in 2010, that's FIVE years ago [1].
|
| kgdb took even longer, I
Ingo Molnar [mi...@kernel.org] wrote:
Meant to Cc Tom Huynh as they had a related patchset a few months
ago.
|
| * Michael Ellerman wrote:
|
| > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
| > > * Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| > >
| > > > This is another attempt to resurrect Andi
|
| * Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au wrote:
|
| We just merged a patch series that was first sent in 2013. Some
| things take time to get right.
|
| The first attempt to get symbolic event name support into perf was
| sent in 2010, that's FIVE years ago [1].
|
| kgdb took even
Ingo Molnar [mi...@kernel.org] wrote:
Meant to Cc Tom Huynh as they had a related patchset a few months
ago.
|
| * Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au wrote:
|
| On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
| * Sukadev Bhattiprolu suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
|
|This
> My suggestion to resolve the technical objections and lift the NAK
> would be:
>
> - to add the tables to the source code, in a more human readable
>format and (optionally) structure the event names better into a
>higher level hierarchy, than the humungous linear dumps with no
>
* Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > We just merged a patch series that was first sent in 2013. Some
> > things take time to get right.
>
> The first attempt to get symbolic event name support into perf was
> sent in 2010, that's FIVE years ago [1].
kgdb took even longer, I think it was first
My suggestion to resolve the technical objections and lift the NAK
would be:
- to add the tables to the source code, in a more human readable
format and (optionally) structure the event names better into a
higher level hierarchy, than the humungous linear dumps with no
* Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au wrote:
We just merged a patch series that was first sent in 2013. Some
things take time to get right.
The first attempt to get symbolic event name support into perf was
sent in 2010, that's FIVE years ago [1].
kgdb took even longer, I think it
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
> > > > can specify perf events by
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:55:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> > This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
> > can specify perf events by their event names rather than raw codes.
> >
> > This is a rebase of Andi Kleen's patchset from
* Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> >
> > > This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
> > > can specify perf events by their event names rather than raw codes.
> > >
> > > This is a
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> > This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
> > can specify perf events by their event names rather than raw codes.
> >
> > This is a rebase of Andi Kleen's patchset from Jul 30,
* Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
> can specify perf events by their event names rather than raw codes.
>
> This is a rebase of Andi Kleen's patchset from Jul 30, 2014[1] to 4.0.
> (I fixed minor and not so minor conflicts).
So
* Sukadev Bhattiprolu suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
can specify perf events by their event names rather than raw codes.
This is a rebase of Andi Kleen's patchset from Jul 30, 2014[1] to 4.0.
(I fixed minor and not so
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Sukadev Bhattiprolu suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
can specify perf events by their event names rather than raw codes.
This is a rebase of Andi Kleen's
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:55:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Sukadev Bhattiprolu suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
can specify perf events by their event names rather than raw codes.
This is a rebase of Andi
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Sukadev Bhattiprolu suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
* Michael Ellerman m...@ellerman.id.au wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Sukadev Bhattiprolu suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
can specify perf events by their event names rather than raw
26 matches
Mail list logo
