Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Jul 3, 2015 1:43 AM, "David Herrmann" wrote: > > Hi > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kernel (CONFIG_KDBUS=y) causes gdm > > to bail saying "oops, something went wrong" or whatever the useless > > standard error message is. > > >

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 03.07.2015 um 17:27 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 10:53:57AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:43 AM, David Herrmann >> wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 10:53:57AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:43 AM, David Herrmann wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kernel (CONFIG_KDBUS=y) causes gdm > >> to bail saying "oops,

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread Richard Weinberger
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:43 AM, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kernel (CONFIG_KDBUS=y) causes gdm >> to bail saying "oops, something went wrong" or whatever the useless >> standard error message is. >>

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kernel (CONFIG_KDBUS=y) causes gdm > to bail saying "oops, something went wrong" or whatever the useless > standard error message is. > > I can work around problem 1 by booting with kdbus=1, but that's

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 10:53:57AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:43 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kernel (CONFIG_KDBUS=y) causes

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Jul 3, 2015 1:43 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kernel (CONFIG_KDBUS=y) causes gdm to bail saying oops, something went wrong or whatever the useless

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 03.07.2015 um 17:27 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 10:53:57AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:43 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Problem 1:

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread Richard Weinberger
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:43 AM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kernel (CONFIG_KDBUS=y) causes gdm to bail saying oops, something went wrong or whatever the useless

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kernel (CONFIG_KDBUS=y) causes gdm to bail saying oops, something went wrong or whatever the useless standard error message is. I can work around problem 1 by booting with

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-02 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> What's a good distro on which to poke at a full running system? > > Fedora Rawhide is probably currently your best bet. I won't swear that all of the problems I'm seeing are 100%

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-02 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: What's a good distro on which to poke at a full running system? Fedora Rawhide is probably currently your best bet. I won't swear that all of the

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-01 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:55:47PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Where does (or did?) the development happen? > > So far development happened at conferences, on Freenode #kdbus, and in > personal meetings. > So the code is

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-01 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Where does (or did?) the development happen? So far development happened at conferences, on Freenode #kdbus, and in personal meetings. Thanks David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-01 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote: Where does (or did?) the development happen? So far development happened at conferences, on Freenode #kdbus, and in personal meetings. Thanks David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-01 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:55:47PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: Hi On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote: Where does (or did?) the development happen? So far development happened at conferences, on Freenode #kdbus, and in personal meetings. So the

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-30 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 30.06.2015 um 03:06 schrieb chunshan.zhu: > David's out tree modules kdbus tree > > > https://github.com/systemd/kdbus Thank you Chunshan, but this does not an answer to my questions. Let's try again. ;) Where does (or did?) the development happen? Will it happen on LKML in future? Is there

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-30 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 30.06.2015 um 03:06 schrieb chunshan.zhu: David's out tree modules kdbus tree https://github.com/systemd/kdbus Thank you Chunshan, but this does not an answer to my questions. Let's try again. ;) Where does (or did?) the development happen? Will it happen on LKML in future? Is there a

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread chunshan.zhu
David's out tree modules kdbus tree https://github.com/systemd/kdbus On 06/29/2015 11:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 29.06.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: Greg, On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 29.06.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Greg, >> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community >>>

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Greg, > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community > > members, I figured it would be good to let people know what

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread Richard Weinberger
Greg, On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Hi all, > > Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community > members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on > with things at the moment. > > We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself)

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread Richard Weinberger
Greg, On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: Hi all, Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on with things at the moment. We (David, Daniel,

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: Greg, On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: Hi all, Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community members, I figured it would be good to let

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 29.06.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: Greg, On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: Hi all, Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread chunshan.zhu
David's out tree modules kdbus tree https://github.com/systemd/kdbus On 06/29/2015 11:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 29.06.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: Greg, On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-28 Thread Richard Weinberger
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> What's a good distro on which to poke at a full running system? > > Fedora Rawhide is probably currently your best bet. > >> Fedora Rawhide seems to still build systemd with

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-28 Thread Richard Weinberger
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: What's a good distro on which to poke at a full running system? Fedora Rawhide is probably currently your best bet. Fedora Rawhide seems to still

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-26 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > What's a good distro on which to poke at a full running system? Fedora Rawhide is probably currently your best bet. > Fedora Rawhide seems to still build systemd with --disable-kdbus, > although I suppose that means that I could boot it

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-26 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Hi all, > > Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community > members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on > with things at the moment. > > We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not

[!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-26 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
Hi all, Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on with things at the moment. We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not need to rush anything and will be delaying the kdbus merge request for

[!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-26 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
Hi all, Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on with things at the moment. We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not need to rush anything and will be delaying the kdbus merge request for

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-26 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: Hi all, Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on with things at the moment. We (David, Daniel, Djalal,

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-26 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote: What's a good distro on which to poke at a full running system? Fedora Rawhide is probably currently your best bet. Fedora Rawhide seems to still build systemd with --disable-kdbus, although I suppose that means that