On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 12:01:54PM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> This needs a followup fix, commit 9b025eb3a89e041bab6698e3858706be2385d692
> ("xfs: Fix missing xfs_iunlock() on error recovery path in xfs_readlink()").
> I think it should be also cherry-picked in this release.
Thanks
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:52:43AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> know.
>
> --
>
> From: Carlos Maiolino
>
> commit b52a360b2aa1c59ba9970fb0f52bbb093fcc7a24 upstream
>
[...]
> @@ -564,13 +564,20 @@
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:52:43AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
--
From: Carlos Maiolino cmaiol...@redhat.com
commit b52a360b2aa1c59ba9970fb0f52bbb093fcc7a24 upstream
[...]
@@ -564,13
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 12:01:54PM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
This needs a followup fix, commit 9b025eb3a89e041bab6698e3858706be2385d692
(xfs: Fix missing xfs_iunlock() on error recovery path in xfs_readlink()).
I think it should be also cherry-picked in this release.
Thanks
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Carlos Maiolino
commit b52a360b2aa1c59ba9970fb0f52bbb093fcc7a24 upstream
Fixes a possible memory corruption when the link is larger than
MAXPATHLEN and XFS_DEBUG is not enabled. This also
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Carlos Maiolino cmaiol...@redhat.com
commit b52a360b2aa1c59ba9970fb0f52bbb093fcc7a24 upstream
Fixes a possible memory corruption when the link is larger than
MAXPATHLEN and XFS_DEBUG is
6 matches
Mail list logo