On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 00:47 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sven Joachim
> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:41:32 +0200
>
> > On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> >> 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > I'm seeing several
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 00:47 -0400, David Miller wrote:
From: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:41:32 +0200
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I'm seeing several
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:47:15AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sven Joachim
> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:41:32 +0200
>
> > On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> >> 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > I'm seeing several
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:47:15AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
From: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:41:32 +0200
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I'm seeing several
From: Sven Joachim
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:41:32 +0200
> On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
>> 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both 3.8.6-rc1 and
> 3.9-rc5: "udevd[56]:
From: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:41:32 +0200
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both 3.8.6-rc1 and
3.9-rc5:
Andy Lutomirski writes:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Eric W. Biederman
> wrote:
>>
>> No. The patch is still bogus.
>>
>> If the problem is that we are not coallescing messages in stream_recvmsg
>> we need a different fix.
>>
>> Probably something like:
>>
>> if
Eric Dumazet writes:
> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:19 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> Well, yes, this commit fixes a real bug : We were coalescing two
>> messages into a single one, even if the senders were different.
>
> By the way, the 'LSB' test program can be found here :
>
>
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Eric Dumazet writes:
>
>> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:05 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Sven Joachim writes:
>>>
>>> > On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any
Eric Dumazet writes:
> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:05 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Sven Joachim writes:
>>
>> > On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> >
>> >> 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
>> >> know.
>> >
>> > I'm seeing several
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:19 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Well, yes, this commit fixes a real bug : We were coalescing two
> messages into a single one, even if the senders were different.
By the way, the 'LSB' test program can be found here :
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:05 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Sven Joachim writes:
>
> > On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> >> 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both
Andy Lutomirski writes:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 10:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This sounds suspiciously like an SCM_CREDENTIALS bug triggered by a
>>> race. There's a fix (that needs both a new version from me and a review
Sven Joachim writes:
> On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
>> 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both 3.8.6-rc1 and
> 3.9-rc5: "udevd[56]: sender uid=65534, message ignored".
Hi
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:10:40PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > On 2013-04-03 16:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 13:41 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > >> On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 10:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>>
>> This sounds suspiciously like an SCM_CREDENTIALS bug triggered by a
>> race. There's a fix (that needs both a new version from me and a review
>> by someone) here:
>>
>>
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 10:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> This sounds suspiciously like an SCM_CREDENTIALS bug triggered by a
> race. There's a fix (that needs both a new version from me and a review
> by someone) here:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg229948.html
Hmm... this is
On 04/03/2013 08:35 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:10 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2013-04-03 16:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>>
>>> It might be a wrong sender (application bug or bad identity), and udevd
>>> correctly discards the incoming message.
>>
>> How would I
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:10 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-04-03 16:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > It might be a wrong sender (application bug or bad identity), and udevd
> > correctly discards the incoming message.
>
> How would I find out the culprit?
Change udevd to display the
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:10:40PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-04-03 16:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 13:41 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>
> >> > 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any
On 2013-04-03 16:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 13:41 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>> > 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 13:41 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both 3.8.6-rc1 and
> 3.9-rc5: "udevd[56]: sender
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both 3.8.6-rc1 and
3.9-rc5: "udevd[56]: sender uid=65534, message ignored". Reverting the
patch below on top of
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net writes:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Eric W. Biederman ebied...@xmission.com
wrote:
No. The patch is still bogus.
If the problem is that we are not coallescing messages in stream_recvmsg
we need a different fix.
Probably something like:
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both 3.8.6-rc1 and
3.9-rc5: udevd[56]: sender uid=65534, message ignored. Reverting the
patch below on top of
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 13:41 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both 3.8.6-rc1 and
3.9-rc5: udevd[56]: sender
On 2013-04-03 16:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 13:41 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:10:40PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-04-03 16:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 13:41 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:10 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-04-03 16:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
It might be a wrong sender (application bug or bad identity), and udevd
correctly discards the incoming message.
How would I find out the culprit?
Change udevd to display the pid as
On 04/03/2013 08:35 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:10 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-04-03 16:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
It might be a wrong sender (application bug or bad identity), and udevd
correctly discards the incoming message.
How would I find out the
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 10:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
This sounds suspiciously like an SCM_CREDENTIALS bug triggered by a
race. There's a fix (that needs both a new version from me and a review
by someone) here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg229948.html
Hmm... this is not a
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 10:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
This sounds suspiciously like an SCM_CREDENTIALS bug triggered by a
race. There's a fix (that needs both a new version from me and a review
by someone) here:
Hi
On Wednesday 03 April 2013, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:10:40PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-04-03 16:00 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 13:41 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.8-stable
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both 3.8.6-rc1 and
3.9-rc5: udevd[56]: sender uid=65534, message ignored.
Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net writes:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 10:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
This sounds suspiciously like an SCM_CREDENTIALS bug triggered by a
race. There's a fix (that needs both a new
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:05 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I'm seeing several complaints from udevd at boot in both
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:19 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Well, yes, this commit fixes a real bug : We were coalescing two
messages into a single one, even if the senders were different.
By the way, the 'LSB' test program can be found here :
Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:05 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
I'm seeing
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Eric W. Biederman ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:05 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2013-04-03 00:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
3.8-stable
Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 17:19 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Well, yes, this commit fixes a real bug : We were coalescing two
messages into a single one, even if the senders were different.
By the way, the 'LSB' test program can be found here :
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: dingtianhong
[ Upstream commit 14134f6584212d585b310ce95428014b653dfaf6 ]
SCM_SCREDENTIALS should apply to write() syscalls only either source or
destination
socket asserted SOCK_PASSCRED.
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: dingtianhong dingtianh...@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 14134f6584212d585b310ce95428014b653dfaf6 ]
SCM_SCREDENTIALS should apply to write() syscalls only either source or
destination
socket
42 matches
Mail list logo
