Re: [stable] Re: [01/11] fix amd64 2.6.11 oops on modprobe (saa7110)

2005-03-11 Thread Chris Wright
* Jean Delvare ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi Greg, all, > > > > Not that I really care, but isn't there a rule that a patch "... can > > > not contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes, whitespace > > > cleanups, etc.)"? > > > > Good point. Jean, care to respin the patch? > > Sure,

Re: [01/11] fix amd64 2.6.11 oops on modprobe (saa7110)

2005-03-11 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Greg, all, > > Not that I really care, but isn't there a rule that a patch "... can > > not contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes, whitespace > > cleanups, etc.)"? > > Good point. Jean, care to respin the patch? Sure, sorry for the trouble. --- This is a rewrite of the

Re: [01/11] fix amd64 2.6.11 oops on modprobe (saa7110)

2005-03-11 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Greg, all, Not that I really care, but isn't there a rule that a patch ... can not contain any trivial fixes in it (spelling changes, whitespace cleanups, etc.)? Good point. Jean, care to respin the patch? Sure, sorry for the trouble. --- This is a rewrite of the

Re: [stable] Re: [01/11] fix amd64 2.6.11 oops on modprobe (saa7110)

2005-03-11 Thread Chris Wright
* Jean Delvare ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi Greg, all, Not that I really care, but isn't there a rule that a patch ... can not contain any trivial fixes in it (spelling changes, whitespace cleanups, etc.)? Good point. Jean, care to respin the patch? Sure, sorry for the

Re: [01/11] fix amd64 2.6.11 oops on modprobe (saa7110)

2005-03-10 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:37:40PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 15:07 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > > > -- > > > > This is a rewrite of the saa7110_write_block function, which was plain >

Re: [01/11] fix amd64 2.6.11 oops on modprobe (saa7110)

2005-03-10 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 15:07 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > -- > > This is a rewrite of the saa7110_write_block function, which was plain > broken in the case where the underlying adapter supports I2C_FUNC_I2C.

[01/11] fix amd64 2.6.11 oops on modprobe (saa7110)

2005-03-10 Thread Greg KH
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- This is a rewrite of the saa7110_write_block function, which was plain broken in the case where the underlying adapter supports I2C_FUNC_I2C. It also includes related fixes which ensure that different

[01/11] fix amd64 2.6.11 oops on modprobe (saa7110)

2005-03-10 Thread Greg KH
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- This is a rewrite of the saa7110_write_block function, which was plain broken in the case where the underlying adapter supports I2C_FUNC_I2C. It also includes related fixes which ensure that different

Re: [01/11] fix amd64 2.6.11 oops on modprobe (saa7110)

2005-03-10 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 15:07 -0800, Greg KH wrote: -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- This is a rewrite of the saa7110_write_block function, which was plain broken in the case where the underlying adapter supports I2C_FUNC_I2C. It

Re: [01/11] fix amd64 2.6.11 oops on modprobe (saa7110)

2005-03-10 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:37:40PM -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 15:07 -0800, Greg KH wrote: -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- This is a rewrite of the saa7110_write_block function, which was plain broken in