On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 09:57:07AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Andrei Vagin wrote:
>
> > > > > - mnt = kern_mount_data(_fs_type, ns, 0);
> > >
> > > Here ns->user_ns and get_current_cred()->user_ns are not always equal
> >
> > What do you think about the attached patch?
> > ...
> > -
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 09:57:07AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Andrei Vagin wrote:
>
> > > > > - mnt = kern_mount_data(_fs_type, ns, 0);
> > >
> > > Here ns->user_ns and get_current_cred()->user_ns are not always equal
> >
> > What do you think about the attached patch?
> > ...
> > -
Andrei Vagin wrote:
> > > > - mnt = kern_mount_data(_fs_type, ns, 0);
> >
> > Here ns->user_ns and get_current_cred()->user_ns are not always equal
>
> What do you think about the attached patch?
> ...
> - fc = vfs_new_fs_context(_fs_type, NULL, 0,
> -
Andrei Vagin wrote:
> > > > - mnt = kern_mount_data(_fs_type, ns, 0);
> >
> > Here ns->user_ns and get_current_cred()->user_ns are not always equal
>
> What do you think about the attached patch?
> ...
> - fc = vfs_new_fs_context(_fs_type, NULL, 0,
> -
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:13:20PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 08:34:50PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > We run CRIU tests for vfs/for-next, and today a few of these test failed. I
> > found that the problem appears after this patch..
> >
> > > int
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:13:20PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 08:34:50PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > We run CRIU tests for vfs/for-next, and today a few of these test failed. I
> > found that the problem appears after this patch..
> >
> > > int
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 08:34:50PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> We run CRIU tests for vfs/for-next, and today a few of these test failed. I
> found that the problem appears after this patch..
>
> > int pid_ns_prepare_proc(struct pid_namespace *ns)
> > {
> > + struct
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 08:34:50PM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> We run CRIU tests for vfs/for-next, and today a few of these test failed. I
> found that the problem appears after this patch..
>
> > int pid_ns_prepare_proc(struct pid_namespace *ns)
> > {
> > + struct
Hi David,
We run CRIU tests for vfs/for-next, and today a few of these test failed. I
found that the problem appears after this patch..
https://travis-ci.org/avagin/linux/jobs/393766778
The reproducer is attached. It creates a process in a new set of namespaces
(user, mount, etc) and then this
Hi David,
We run CRIU tests for vfs/for-next, and today a few of these test failed. I
found that the problem appears after this patch..
https://travis-ci.org/avagin/linux/jobs/393766778
The reproducer is attached. It creates a process in a new set of namespaces
(user, mount, etc) and then this
Add fs_context support to procfs.
Signed-off-by: David Howells
---
fs/proc/inode.c|2 -
fs/proc/internal.h |2 -
fs/proc/root.c | 169 ++--
3 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git
Add fs_context support to procfs.
Signed-off-by: David Howells
---
fs/proc/inode.c|2 -
fs/proc/internal.h |2 -
fs/proc/root.c | 169 ++--
3 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c
12 matches
Mail list logo