Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-09-10 Thread Johannes Berg
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 13:09 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 13:11 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > Subject : Unable to access memory card reader anymore > Last known good/caused-by doesn't apply, the bug has been in there ever > since the mac80211 code was merged

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-09-10 Thread Johannes Berg
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 13:11 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Subject : Unable to access memory card reader anymore > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8885 > Last known good : ? > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By : ? >

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-09-10 Thread Johannes Berg
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 13:11 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Subject : Unable to access memory card reader anymore References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8885 Last known good : ? Submitter : Christian Casteyde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : ?

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-09-10 Thread Johannes Berg
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 13:09 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 13:11 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Subject : Unable to access memory card reader anymore Last known good/caused-by doesn't apply, the bug has been in there ever since the mac80211 code was merged into

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-09-08 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc5 with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-09-08 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc5 with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches

2007-09-07 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi David, On 06/09/2007, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 12:11 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > MTD > > > > Subject : error: implicit declaration of function 'cfi_interleave' > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/6/272 > > Last known good

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches

2007-09-07 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi David, On 06/09/2007, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 12:11 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: MTD Subject : error: implicit declaration of function 'cfi_interleave' References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/6/272 Last known good : ?

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches

2007-09-06 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 16:04 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > You shouldn't push this even for 2.6.24 ... I can't see why/how a runtime > BUG() scores over erroring out at build-time itself. And if there is no > codepath that leads to that BUG() at runtime, then what's the point of > adding dead code

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches

2007-09-06 Thread Satyam Sharma
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, David Woodhouse wrote: > > This isn't really a regression -- it's been like this for years. It's a > non-functional configuration which doesn't really make sense, and would > only crop up with randconfig (or crack). > > Linus was offered the patch a few weeks ago, but

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches

2007-09-06 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 12:11 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > MTD > > Subject : error: implicit declaration of function 'cfi_interleave' > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/6/272 > Last known good : ? > Submitter : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By : ? >

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches

2007-09-06 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 12:11 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: MTD Subject : error: implicit declaration of function 'cfi_interleave' References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/6/272 Last known good : ? Submitter : Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : ? Handled-By

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches

2007-09-06 Thread Satyam Sharma
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, David Woodhouse wrote: This isn't really a regression -- it's been like this for years. It's a non-functional configuration which doesn't really make sense, and would only crop up with randconfig (or crack). Linus was offered the patch a few weeks ago, but didn't take

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches

2007-09-06 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 16:04 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: You shouldn't push this even for 2.6.24 ... I can't see why/how a runtime BUG() scores over erroring out at build-time itself. And if there is no codepath that leads to that BUG() at runtime, then what's the point of adding dead code ...

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches

2007-09-03 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc5 with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk9

Re: [2/2] 2.6.23-rc5: known regressions with patches

2007-09-03 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc5 with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk9