Re: [2/2] ath10k: use complete() instead complete_all()

Daniel Wagner wrote: > From: Daniel Wagner > > There is only one waiter for the completion, therefore there > is no need to use complete_all(). Let's make that clear by > using complete() instead of complete_all(). > > The usage pattern of the

Re: [2/2] ath10k: use complete() instead complete_all()

Daniel Wagner wrote: > From: Daniel Wagner > > There is only one waiter for the completion, therefore there > is no need to use complete_all(). Let's make that clear by > using complete() instead of complete_all(). > > The usage pattern of the completion is: > > waiter context

[PATCH 2/2] ath10k: use complete() instead complete_all()

From: Daniel Wagner There is only one waiter for the completion, therefore there is no need to use complete_all(). Let's make that clear by using complete() instead of complete_all(). The usage pattern of the completion is: waiter context

[PATCH 2/2] ath10k: use complete() instead complete_all()

From: Daniel Wagner There is only one waiter for the completion, therefore there is no need to use complete_all(). Let's make that clear by using complete() instead of complete_all(). The usage pattern of the completion is: waiter context waker context scan.started